Were they running F@H?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2020 5:20 pm
Re: Were they running F@H?
that is Summit, IBM's supercomputer. It is a different project. One of the F@H researcher did talk about it during the AMA
My room is always Hot.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
- Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4 - Location: Western Washington
Re: Were they running F@H?
Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org
We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
Re: Were they running F@H?
Things can get really interesting when we reach a few exaflops. Imagine the science that can be done!Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org
We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
Re: Were they running F@H?
Just curious, how do you get those numbers from the stats? Can't find anything about FLOPS or number of processors anywhere.Jesse_V wrote:Fun fact: Summit currently sits at around 150 petaFLOPS from 2.4 million cores. A couple months ago, Folding@home was at about 95 petaFLOPS. This project is now at 958 x86-petaFLOPS from 2.97 million CPU cores and 270,000 GPUs. https://stats.foldingathome.org
We're all in this together and we will nail this thing. F@h's results are going to go out as quickly as possible.
Re: Were they running F@H?
It's on the last tab (OS): https://stats.foldingathome.org/os
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900X (1x21 CPUs) ~ GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Asus)
Re: Were they running F@H?
ah, thanks. Unfortunately that tab does not seem to load for me. I only see the description, but no results.
Re: Were they running F@H?
Screenshot from a few minutes ago:
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900X (1x21 CPUs) ~ GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Asus)
-
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon E5-2697v3@2.60GHz, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21
2: Xeon E3-1505Mv5@2.80GHz, 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these)
3: i7-960@3.20GHz, 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 - Location: UK
Re: Were they running F@H?
… and three days later current Total showing 767,977 TFLOPS and 1,554,728 x86 TFLOPS
2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)
Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M
i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti
i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070
(Green/Bold = Active)