GeForce RTX 2060
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
And "EVGA RTX 2060 KO" performance speedup only shows in compute workflows like CUDA or OpenCL used by FAH. It does not showup in 3D games, so no sold out because of gamers. It will be a good choice for FAH users
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
Does anybody know if there's an OpenCL program somwhere that can report the actual hardware characteristics of a GPU? Utilites like GPU-Z simply look up the information in a table and you always get the same information that's advertised (or posted on Wikipedia).
The official Ti suffix means there's an actual change to the hardware. I'm not sure if the KO suffix means the same thing since it's not a change to the NVidia designation.
The official Ti suffix means there's an actual change to the hardware. I'm not sure if the KO suffix means the same thing since it's not a change to the NVidia designation.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
I found that the Nvidia SDK for linux has a sample program for querying CUDA Device information. I've included the output for my EVGA 2060 KO (non-ultra) from both the app deviceQuery and "nvidia-smi --query". Both report 1920 CUDA cores as expected.bruce wrote:Does anybody know if there's an OpenCL program somwhere that can report the actual hardware characteristics of a GPU?
It's only been running for ~15 minutes, but FahCore_21 on Project 14320 is showing estimated TPF of 2 minutes 50 seconds, estimated PPD 997345.
Code: Select all
[@localhost bin]$ lspci | grep -i 2060
4a:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation TU104 [GeForce RTX 2060] (rev a1)
Code: Select all
Device 0: "GeForce RTX 2060"
CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version 10.2 / 10.2
CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number: 7.5
Total amount of global memory: 5935 MBytes (6222839808 bytes)
(30) Multiprocessors, ( 64) CUDA Cores/MP: 1920 CUDA Cores
GPU Max Clock rate: 1680 MHz (1.68 GHz)
Memory Clock rate: 7001 Mhz
Memory Bus Width: 192-bit
L2 Cache Size: 3145728 bytes
Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z) 1D=(131072), 2D=(131072, 65536), 3D=(16384, 16384, 16384)
Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers 1D=(32768), 2048 layers
Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers 2D=(32768, 32768), 2048 layers
Total amount of constant memory: 65536 bytes
Total amount of shared memory per block: 49152 bytes
Total number of registers available per block: 65536
Warp size: 32
Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor: 1024
Maximum number of threads per block: 1024
Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
Max dimension size of a grid size (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
Maximum memory pitch: 2147483647 bytes
Texture alignment: 512 bytes
Concurrent copy and kernel execution: Yes with 3 copy engine(s)
Run time limit on kernels: No
Integrated GPU sharing Host Memory: No
Support host page-locked memory mapping: Yes
Alignment requirement for Surfaces: Yes
Device has ECC support: Disabled
Device supports Unified Addressing (UVA): Yes
Device supports Compute Preemption: Yes
Supports Cooperative Kernel Launch: Yes
Supports MultiDevice Co-op Kernel Launch: Yes
Device PCI Domain ID / Bus ID / location ID: 0 / 74 / 0
Compute Mode:
Code: Select all
GPU 00000000:4A:00.0
Product Name : GeForce RTX 2060
Product Brand : GeForce
Display Mode : Disabled
Display Active : Disabled
Persistence Mode : Disabled
Accounting Mode : Disabled
Accounting Mode Buffer Size : 4000
Driver Model
Current : N/A
Pending : N/A
Serial Number : N/A
GPU UUID : GPU-xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
Minor Number : 2
VBIOS Version : 90.04.63.40.58
MultiGPU Board : No
Board ID : 0x4a00
GPU Part Number : N/A
Inforom Version
Image Version : G001.0000.02.04
OEM Object : 1.1
ECC Object : N/A
Power Management Object : N/A
GPU Operation Mode
Current : N/A
Pending : N/A
GPU Virtualization Mode
Virtualization Mode : None
Host VGPU Mode : N/A
IBMNPU
Relaxed Ordering Mode : N/A
PCI
Bus : 0x4A
Device : 0x00
Domain : 0x0000
Device Id : 0x1E8910DE
Bus Id : 00000000:4A:00.0
Sub System Id : 0x20663842
GPU Link Info
PCIe Generation
Max : 3
Current : 3
Link Width
Max : 16x
Current : 16x
Bridge Chip
Type : N/A
Firmware : N/A
Replays Since Reset : 0
Replay Number Rollovers : 0
Tx Throughput : 8000 KB/s
Rx Throughput : 51000 KB/s
Fan Speed : 89 %
Performance State : P2
Clocks Throttle Reasons
Idle : Not Active
Applications Clocks Setting : Not Active
SW Power Cap : Active
HW Slowdown : Not Active
HW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active
HW Power Brake Slowdown : Not Active
Sync Boost : Not Active
SW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active
Display Clock Setting : Not Active
FB Memory Usage
Total : 5934 MiB
Used : 107 MiB
Free : 5827 MiB
BAR1 Memory Usage
Total : 256 MiB
Used : 8 MiB
Free : 248 MiB
Compute Mode : Default
Utilization
Gpu : 99 %
Memory : 10 %
Encoder : 0 %
Decoder : 0 %
Encoder Stats
Active Sessions : 0
Average FPS : 0
Average Latency : 0
FBC Stats
Active Sessions : 0
Average FPS : 0
Average Latency : 0
Ecc Mode
Current : N/A
Pending : N/A
ECC Errors
Volatile
SRAM Correctable : N/A
SRAM Uncorrectable : N/A
DRAM Correctable : N/A
DRAM Uncorrectable : N/A
Aggregate
SRAM Correctable : N/A
SRAM Uncorrectable : N/A
DRAM Correctable : N/A
DRAM Uncorrectable : N/A
Retired Pages
Single Bit ECC : N/A
Double Bit ECC : N/A
Pending Page Blacklist : N/A
Temperature
GPU Current Temp : 82 C
GPU Shutdown Temp : 93 C
GPU Slowdown Temp : 90 C
GPU Max Operating Temp : 88 C
Memory Current Temp : N/A
Memory Max Operating Temp : N/A
Power Readings
Power Management : Supported
Power Draw : 153.49 W
Power Limit : 170.00 W
Default Power Limit : 170.00 W
Enforced Power Limit : 170.00 W
Min Power Limit : 125.00 W
Max Power Limit : 170.00 W
Clocks
Graphics : 1845 MHz
SM : 1845 MHz
Memory : 6801 MHz
Video : 1710 MHz
Applications Clocks
Graphics : N/A
Memory : N/A
Default Applications Clocks
Graphics : N/A
Memory : N/A
Max Clocks
Graphics : 2100 MHz
SM : 2100 MHz
Memory : 7001 MHz
Video : 1950 MHz
Max Customer Boost Clocks
Graphics : N/A
Clock Policy
Auto Boost : N/A
Auto Boost Default : N/A
Processes
Process ID : 4263
Type : C
Name : /var/lib/fahclient/cores/cores.foldingathome.org/v7/lin/64bit/Core_21.fah/FahCore_21
Used GPU Memory : 95 MiB
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:22 pm
- Hardware configuration: Asus Z8NA D6C, 2 x5670@3.2 Ghz, , 12gb Ram, GTX 980ti, AX650 PSU, win 10 (daily use)
Asus Z87 WS, Xeon E3-1230L v3, 8gb ram, KFA GTX 1080, EVGA 750ti , AX760 PSU, Mint 18.2 OS
Not currently folding
Asus Z9PE- D8 WS, 2 E5-2665@2.3 Ghz, 16Gb 1.35v Ram, Ubuntu (Fold only)
Asus Z9PA, 2 Ivy 12 core, 16gb Ram, H folding appliance (fold only) - Location: Jersey, Channel islands
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
That PPD of 997k on 14320 is roughly in line with my normal 2060 so no increase there
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
useful data @Nathan_PNathan_P wrote:That PPD of 997k on 14320 is roughly in line with my normal 2060 so no increase there
I've seen massive variations in 11738 WU with anything from 1.19m to 700K on identical 1070s. That figure earlier of nearly 1.4m might not be overly representative of the 2060 KO.
single 1070
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2018 11:53 pm
- Hardware configuration: #1WIN10 Pro Case NZXT H510i HTPC/Gaming/Folding ,CPU i5 9600K, (CM ML240P Mirage AIO), Gigabyte Z390 Auros Pro Wifi(1151) Gskil Ripjaws 32GB 3200 RAM, GPU(Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti & EVGA RTX 2060,)Crucial 1TB SSD, HD 4TB (Plus 10TB external as Plex Server) Asus MG28UQ 28" 4K, Logitech 700s Mouse, Corsair 850W, Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Yellow Switch)
#2WIN10 Lian Li Lancool 2 White, CPU,4690K(Hyper 212 Black RGB),Asus Z97IPlus Mini iTX(LGA1150), G skil 16GB RAM, Gigabyte GTX 970,
Corsair 650W, Case Lian Li Lancool 2 White.
#2Win7 2600k@4.5GHZ(Hyper212+)Msi P67 G65(B3) 16GB RAM, EVGA RTX 2060, Corsair 750W
Phones:Pixek 4 XL Orange,Pixel 3 64GB(Not Pink),Pixel 2 XL 128GB Black, Moto G6 (2019)
Fios Gigabit(Ludicrous Speed), Hulu , Starz, Disney+($3.92 deal) Plus HD Antenna/HDHomerun Quatro/Plex, Netflix,Amazon Prime,
RIP Danny..You made the world a better place 1989-2015, Folded for Tim and his wife,
Mark and his wife,Pete_Scout , Oldskool and Adak..."He was the Best of us" - Location: SE PA.
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
I think you will find it is(Representative), my KO Ultra gets those fame rates (and around that PPD) on every 11737 and 11738 WU.HaloJones wrote:useful data @Nathan_PNathan_P wrote:That PPD of 997k on 14320 is roughly in line with my normal 2060 so no increase there
I've seen massive variations in 11738 WU with anything from 1.19m to 700K on identical 1070s. That figure earlier of nearly 1.4m might not be overly representative of the 2060 KO.
The 2060 KO is running an 11738 at 2 min 03 secs PPD 1354549 currently ,I have not seen it work a 11739 (Its probably in my logs) yet but since my 1080TI is at 1 min 03 secs PPD 1402197 currently , I anticipate the 2060 KO Ultra doing the same...Also to be accurate all my numbers indicate 1,350,000 to 1,360,000 as an average not 1.4million...Just to be accurate.
My question is...Why doesn't it perform better on the other WU's?
This is a dedicated folding rig with the 1080 TI handling the screen and any background usage...The 1080 TI PPD goes up and down but the KO is constant. If the KO was running the monitor and handling other tasks, I would expect PPD to be lower.
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
The crazy numbers are due to the Core22 WU, not the chip. My 2060 does 1.4M PPD on 11738 as well, and does around 1.2M on 11739. Core21 WU generally sit around 1M
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2018 11:53 pm
- Hardware configuration: #1WIN10 Pro Case NZXT H510i HTPC/Gaming/Folding ,CPU i5 9600K, (CM ML240P Mirage AIO), Gigabyte Z390 Auros Pro Wifi(1151) Gskil Ripjaws 32GB 3200 RAM, GPU(Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti & EVGA RTX 2060,)Crucial 1TB SSD, HD 4TB (Plus 10TB external as Plex Server) Asus MG28UQ 28" 4K, Logitech 700s Mouse, Corsair 850W, Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Yellow Switch)
#2WIN10 Lian Li Lancool 2 White, CPU,4690K(Hyper 212 Black RGB),Asus Z97IPlus Mini iTX(LGA1150), G skil 16GB RAM, Gigabyte GTX 970,
Corsair 650W, Case Lian Li Lancool 2 White.
#2Win7 2600k@4.5GHZ(Hyper212+)Msi P67 G65(B3) 16GB RAM, EVGA RTX 2060, Corsair 750W
Phones:Pixek 4 XL Orange,Pixel 3 64GB(Not Pink),Pixel 2 XL 128GB Black, Moto G6 (2019)
Fios Gigabit(Ludicrous Speed), Hulu , Starz, Disney+($3.92 deal) Plus HD Antenna/HDHomerun Quatro/Plex, Netflix,Amazon Prime,
RIP Danny..You made the world a better place 1989-2015, Folded for Tim and his wife,
Mark and his wife,Pete_Scout , Oldskool and Adak..."He was the Best of us" - Location: SE PA.
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
Now that is interesting, I have not seen that on my 2 vanilla 2060's. Is that highly OC'ed?squads wrote:The crazy numbers are due to the Core22 WU, not the chip. My 2060 does 1.4M PPD on 11738 as well, and does around 1.2M on 11739. Core21 WU generally sit around 1M
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
Hardware wise, a GPU with N shaders (or "CUDA Cores") running at M Ghz will produce a certain number of GFLOPS when producing 100% of it's capabilities. The concept of "hidden cores" isn't valid.
It's certainly true that small proteins can't maintain 100% production if N is a large number whereas large proteins get very, very close.
FACT: Your GPU can't produce more than 100%, no matter what changes in the FAHCore.
This whole discussion can be validated or invalidated by testing a somewhat smaller protein on a smaller GPU. That should produce close to 100% throughput on that GPU and should establish a reasonable estimate of what PPD that GPU can do. Larger proteins would then also produce 100% throughput and (if the proteins are properly benchmarked) about the same PPD.
It's certainly true that small proteins can't maintain 100% production if N is a large number whereas large proteins get very, very close.
FACT: Your GPU can't produce more than 100%, no matter what changes in the FAHCore.
This whole discussion can be validated or invalidated by testing a somewhat smaller protein on a smaller GPU. That should produce close to 100% throughput on that GPU and should establish a reasonable estimate of what PPD that GPU can do. Larger proteins would then also produce 100% throughput and (if the proteins are properly benchmarked) about the same PPD.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
This website benchmarked the RTX 2060 KO with improvements in CUDA compute workloads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUFRBnJdx3Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUFRBnJdx3Y
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
At this point, FAH uses OpenCL. As far as I know, the OpenCL is built on top of CUDA, so if CUDA's FloatinmPoint performance is made more efficient, some of that improvment might or might not be passed on as an improvement to OpenCL. Your benchmarking is probably a good tool to determine that. It's reasonable to assume that the KO benchmarking comparing OpenCL performance of the KO to the OpenCL performance of the non-KO wouldn't be as effective to comparing KO CUDA to non-KO CUDA, because FAHCores have not run native CUDA recently.
At some time in the future, FAHCore_22 might (or might not) be recompiled to use native CUDA rather than OpenCL. Such a recompile will be beneficial for all nVidia GPUs but AMD GPUs will still be using the OpenCL version.
At some time in the future, FAHCore_22 might (or might not) be recompiled to use native CUDA rather than OpenCL. Such a recompile will be beneficial for all nVidia GPUs but AMD GPUs will still be using the OpenCL version.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:12 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS; NVidia 525.60.11; 2 x 4070ti; 4070; 4060ti; 3x 3080; 3070ti; 3070
- Location: Great White North
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
KO is just an old suffix EVGA has resurrected for this line of cards like the ‘XC’ they also use.bruce wrote:... I'm not sure if the KO suffix means the same thing since it's not a change to the NVidia designation.
It has the somewhat anaemic cooler from the 1660 Super which is inferior to that found on the 2060 and 2060 Super XC and Ultra models they sell.
I can also confirm that the PPD seen on this card is in-line with my 2060 XC Ultra.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
Too bad. So no hot deal GPU for FAH.gordonbb wrote:I can also confirm that the PPD seen on this card is in-line with my 2060 XC Ultra.
Re: GeForce RTX 2060
No its actually power limited to 140W (stock 160W). I also use Linux, which generally gives a bit of bump in PPD, so those two factors probably balance out.chex313 wrote:Now that is interesting, I have not seen that on my 2 vanilla 2060's. Is that highly OC'ed?squads wrote:The crazy numbers are due to the Core22 WU, not the chip. My 2060 does 1.4M PPD on 11738 as well, and does around 1.2M on 11739. Core21 WU generally sit around 1M
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6359
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Please add GeForce RTX 2060
No they don't, they're disabled. But the entire chip architecture (memory controllers and compute pipeline design) does.foldy wrote:So the hidden shaders of EVGA RTX 2060 KO really help FAH compute performance.