Project 14167
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Project 14167
Hello all!
These jobs are so hot!
It is impossible to work with a computer during their folding, Windows core load 99%, Linux - 100%!
And why do these WU's in beta status viewtopic.php?f=66&t=31367 arrive on my advanced key?
These jobs are so hot!
It is impossible to work with a computer during their folding, Windows core load 99%, Linux - 100%!
And why do these WU's in beta status viewtopic.php?f=66&t=31367 arrive on my advanced key?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project 14167
The project moved to advanced as per this announcement : viewtopic.php?f=24&t=31395
Which GPU do you have ? We need more details ...
Which GPU do you have ? We need more details ...
Re: Project 14167
All jobs are supposed to use all of the resources they can detect that aren't used by foreground tasks.Calcii wrote:These jobs are so hot!
If you've overclocked your system, FAH may cause it to crash because FAH is better at using the resources that many traditional overclocking benchmarks.
The CPU resources should be able to run as close to 100% as FAH can achieve since everything else will be at a higher priority and will interrupt its CPU processing.
The most common cause of "screen lag" is folding on a GPU. Pause that slot if you have one and confirm if that's your problem. We can help with that, but you'll need to post the first part of FAH's log.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: Project 14167
"moved to advanced" missed it, thxtoTOW wrote:The project moved to advanced as per this announcement : viewtopic.php?f=24&t=31395
Which GPU do you have ? We need more details ...
GPU is 1080 Ti
Temperature not my problem(about 54 degrees Celsius), a problem in loading up to 99% of GPU because of what there are friezes on browser and other software
Information For All Crunchers: Raising the memory frequency by 500 MHz reduces TPF by 3-4 seconds on that jobs. Maybe i have not tested such overclocking for a long time, but this was not observed on other jobs
Re: Project 14167
And scoring seems to be lower than other units.
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Project 14167
If you get lag in browser because of FAH GPU usage then in your browser or other software you can try to disable GPU hardware acceleration.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project 14167
As mentioned in beta thread :Trotador wrote:And scoring seems to be lower than other units.
But as usual, if you don't provide more details (GPU/OS/Drivers/Expected PPD/Actual PPD), your report is useless ...toTOW wrote:This project is showing weird scaling on some GPUs (on 1080 for instance), so let us know if you find abnormal PPD.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project 14167
Here are my numbers :
1080 - 1873 MHz - Windows - (target 800k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:30 - 765 711,7 PPD
1070 - 2012 MHz - Windows - (target 620k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:00 - 698 398,6 PPD
980 - 1330 MHz - Windows - (target 380k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:35 - 475 748,7 PPD
1080 - 1873 MHz - Windows - (target 800k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:30 - 765 711,7 PPD
1070 - 2012 MHz - Windows - (target 620k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:00 - 698 398,6 PPD
980 - 1330 MHz - Windows - (target 380k PPD)
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:35 - 475 748,7 PPD
Re: Project 14167
here some data, two cards in the same host with Ubuntu, average joint daily scoring has decreased around 120Kppd, not a lot but noticeable
card 1 : GTX 1080
63ºC
1900 Mhz
card 2: GTX 1080
56ºC
2012 Mhz
card 1 : GTX 1080
63ºC
1900 Mhz
Code: Select all
*********************** Log Started 2019-02-16T16:16:05Z ***********************
17:58:59:WU01:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-16T17:58:59Z ***********************
17:58:59:WU01:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 13, Clone 9, Gen 22)
17:58:59:WU01:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x0000001d0002894c5c3d11ed2dd0a12e
17:59:21:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
---
21:16:51:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
-------
21:17:12:WU02:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-16T21:17:11Z ***********************
21:17:12:WU02:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 22, Clone 2, Gen 36)
21:17:12:WU02:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x000000280002894c5c3d11f81d181491
21:17:20:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
21:17:20:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate, 96866.00 points
21:17:39:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
------
00:34:59:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
---
00:35:19:WU00:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T00:35:19Z ***********************
00:35:19:WU00:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 3, Clone 4, Gen 57)
00:35:19:WU00:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x0000003e0002894c5c3d11d7381221b2
00:35:19:WU00:FS01:0x21:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
00:35:36:WU02:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
00:35:46:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
--
03:50:45:WU00:FS01:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
03:51:05:WU01:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T03:51:05Z ***********************
03:51:05:WU01:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 12, Clone 18, Gen 7)
03:51:05:WU01:FS01:0x21:Unit: 0x000000080002894c5c3d11ed24f1cf8d
03:51:05:WU01:FS01:0x21:CPU: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
03:51:18:WU00:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
03:51:18:WU00:FS01:Final credit estimate, 97431.00 points
03:51:28:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
03:51:28:WU01:FS01:0x21:Temperature control disabled. Requirements: single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
03:53:26:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 12500 out of 1250000 steps (1%)
03:55:23:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 25000 out of 1250000 steps (2%)
07:07:42:WU01:FS01:0x21:Completed 1237500 out of 1250000 steps (99%)
07:10:01:WU02:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T07:10:00Z ***********************
07:10:01:WU02:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 27, Clone 14, Gen 18)
07:10:13:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
07:10:13:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate, 96674.00 points
07:10:31:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
07:10:31:WU02:FS01:0x21:Temperature control disabled. Requirements: single Nvidia GPU, tmax must be < 110 and twait >= 900
07:12:29:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 12500 out of 1250000 steps (1%)
10:27:19:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 1237500 out of 1250000 steps (99%)
10:29:16:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
10:29:56:WU02:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
10:29:56:WU02:FS01:Final credit estimate, 96470.00 points
17:05:59:WU02:FS01:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T17:05:58Z ***********************
17:05:59:WU02:FS01:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 15, Clone 12, Gen 19)
17:06:16:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
17:06:16:WU01:FS01:Final credit estimate, 96686.00 points
17:06:27:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
20:21:55:WU02:FS01:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
20:22:33:WU02:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
20:22:33:WU02:FS01:Final credit estimate, 97283.00 points
56ºC
2012 Mhz
Code: Select all
*********************** Log Started 2019-02-16T16:16:05Z ***********************
22:25:32:WU01:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-16T22:25:31Z ***********************
22:25:32:WU01:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 10, Clone 2, Gen 45)
22:25:32:WU01:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x000000300002894c5c3d11e867c9bb1d
22:25:55:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
22:25:55:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99176.00 points
22:26:00:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
--
01:35:58:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
01:36:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T01:36:18Z ***********************
01:36:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 1, Clone 11, Gen 20)
01:36:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x000000180002894c5c3d11d3c9a0dbf5
01:36:27:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
01:36:27:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 98721.00 points
01:36:44:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
--
04:43:59:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
04:44:20:WU00:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T04:44:19Z ***********************
04:44:20:WU00:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 31, Clone 6, Gen 47)
04:44:20:WU00:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x000000330002894c5c3d1205c1e1292e
04:44:27:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
04:44:27:WU02:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99436.00 points
04:44:44:WU00:FS00:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
---
07:52:12:WU00:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
07:52:31:WU01:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T07:52:31Z ***********************
07:52:31:WU01:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 29, Clone 18, Gen 9)
07:52:31:WU01:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x0000000b0002894c5c3d1203e69e9b9b
07:52:38:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
07:52:38:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99402.00 points
07:52:52:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
---
11:01:01:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
11:01:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T11:01:19Z ***********************
11:01:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 29, Clone 12, Gen 24)
11:01:19:WU02:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x0000001c0002894c5c3d120296174180
11:01:29:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
11:01:29:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99245.00 points
11:03:32:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 12500 out of 1250000 steps (1%)
--
14:10:32:WU02:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
14:10:52:WU00:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T14:10:51Z ***********************
14:10:52:WU00:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 12, Clone 8, Gen 30)
14:10:52:WU00:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x000000200002894c5c3d11ec0a695aee
--
14:11:01:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
14:11:01:WU02:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99055.00 points
14:11:18:WU00:FS00:0x21:Completed 0 out of 1250000 steps (0%)
14:13:11:WU00:FS00:0x21:Completed 12500 out of 1250000 steps (1%)
----
17:21:35:WU00:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
17:21:55:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0x21 started
17:21:56:WU01:FS00:0x21:*********************** Log Started 2019-02-17T17:21:55Z ***********************
17:21:56:WU01:FS00:0x21:Project: 14167 (Run 17, Clone 6, Gen 101)
17:21:56:WU01:FS00:0x21:Unit: 0x0000006a0002894c5c3d11f1c8a6909a
17:22:09:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
17:22:09:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 98624.00 points
--
17:24:14:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 12500 out of 1250000 steps (1%)
--
20:29:04:WU01:FS00:0x21:Completed 1250000 out of 1250000 steps (100%)
20:29:31:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
20:29:31:WU01:FS00:Final credit estimate, 99576.00 points
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Project 14167
It takes 03:10 and makes 99k points so it can do 7.7 work units per day which is 762k PPD.
This matches toTOW's numbers for a gtx 1080
This matches toTOW's numbers for a gtx 1080
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Project 14167
Can confirm the overall Windows UI lag with this project only. CPU usage is only half a core compared to other projects using a full thread mostly. Maybe there is an improvement of UI experience if the steps done by the work unit would be shorter? So it more often has a short pause in GPU and reloads data from CPU more? Don't know if project owner can configure that.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project 14167
What you're seeing are the exact limitations of WDDM that prevent small WUs to use efficiently the GPU : WDDM limits the number of commands per second you can send to the GPU to avoid monopolizing resources and to trigger TDR.
If the WU is big enough, each command send to the GPU contains enough data to keep it busy between two commands, so it's more efficient but it also release GPU for UI operation more slowly ... hence the UI lag on such WUs and the higher power usage.
I noticed that there's less UI lag with newer NV drivers on Windows : 418.91 ...
If the WU is big enough, each command send to the GPU contains enough data to keep it busy between two commands, so it's more efficient but it also release GPU for UI operation more slowly ... hence the UI lag on such WUs and the higher power usage.
I noticed that there's less UI lag with newer NV drivers on Windows : 418.91 ...
-
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:43 pm
- Hardware configuration: Folding@Home Client 7.6.13 (1 GPU slots)
Windows 7 64bit
Intel Core i5 2500k@4Ghz
Nvidia gtx 1080ti driver 441
Re: Project 14167
If we get more of these projects in the future maybe it is possible to keep the package size between two commands smaller so it is slightly less efficient but UI stays responsive? Or make that an extra option.
Re: Project 14167
I'm not sure which package size you're concerned about, but you might check the peak utilization of your paging file and see if you're approaching its limit.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Project 14167
He's talking about OpenCL kernel size. Some GPGPU projects have options in their application for tweaking some values that will move the balance between UI responsiveness and raw compute performances.
I think our older cores (core11) on ATI GPUs had such options ...
I think our older cores (core11) on ATI GPUs had such options ...