Are the 'default' F@H settings optimal for CPU+GPU?

If you're new to FAH and need help getting started or you have very basic questions, start here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
dreiter
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:43 am
Location: CA, USA

Are the 'default' F@H settings optimal for CPU+GPU?

Post by dreiter »

While I'm not technically new to the folding world, I have been out of the game for a while. I have recently downloaded the newest Windows client. My question is if the client automatically selects the best number of CPU threads or if I should set a custom value. I have a 6600K (4 cores, 4 threads) and an AMD HD 7950.

By default the client selects 2 CPU cores in addition to the GPU. My understanding was that only 1 core was needed for the GPU to run optimally? Would I get better performance by selecting 3 cores instead of just the 2?

Thank you!
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 7927
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp4
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp2
Location: W. MA

Re: Are the 'default' F@H settings optimal for CPU+GPU?

Post by Joe_H »

The default settings for the client use the Medium setting for desktops and Light for laptops. The Medium setting reserves one core for your own computer usage, you can move the slider to Full if you want to have it be used for folding.
Image

iMac 2.8 i7 12 GB smp8, Mac Pro 2.8 quad 12 GB smp6
MacBook Pro 2.9 i7 8 GB smp3
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Are the 'default' F@H settings optimal for CPU+GPU?

Post by bruce »

That depends. There are a multitude of different system configurations. For relatively common configurarions, the default setting together with the slider give you good choices. For more complex systems. some additional tweaking can take more factors into consideration so you may be able to improve things. The public beta version of the client has resolved one important factor that often results in no CPU assignments if you're running the V7.4.4 released version.

In other words, the default settings are reasonable for a system like yours.
(...but you still have a simple choice.)
dreiter wrote:By default the client selects 2 CPU cores in addition to the GPU. My understanding was that only 1 core was needed for the GPU to run optimally? Would I get better performance by selecting 3 cores instead of just the 2?
Yes. ... and "Medium" will give you 2 and "Full" will give you 3 (more electricity, more heat, and more performance.)
dreiter
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:43 am
Location: CA, USA

Re: Are the 'default' F@H settings optimal for CPU+GPU?

Post by dreiter »

Joe_H wrote:The default settings for the client use the Medium setting for desktops and Light for laptops. The Medium setting reserves one core for your own computer usage, you can move the slider to Full if you want to have it be used for folding.
bruce wrote:That depends. There are a multitude of different system configurations. For relatively common configurarions, the default setting together with the slider give you good choices. For more complex systems. some additional tweaking can take more factors into consideration so you may be able to improve things. The public beta version of the client has resolved one important factor that often results in no CPU assignments if you're running the V7.4.4 released version.

In other words, the default settings are reasonable for a system like yours .
Thank you both; that's all I needed to know!
Post Reply