I can't imagine the 2 sentences in the project 3903 description could, in any way, be used by anyone to compromise a study, pre-announce a result, influence peer review either positively or negatively or be considered bad form. You folks at the Leland Stanford Jr. Farm must be living in a very different world than I have ever seen in my 30+ years at IBM.Finally, I should mention that in science, it's generally very bad form to publicize what one is doing until it's gone through peer review, and it's bad for the project for us to publicize too broadly what we're doing before it gets through peer review. We understand we need to balance that donors need to know what's going on, but sometimes people err on the side of waiting for peer review to give more info. Hopefully we can balance that better in the future.
VijayPande
The thought "where the rubber meets the sky," comes to mind. Maybe you shouldn't be so sensitive and defensive to a little critizism and take the comments for what they say without reading things that aren't said into them.... I just wanted to know what I was working on.