Nobel

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Joe_H wrote:PG does provide certificates of points earned or WU's completed from the Official Stats site - http://folding.stanford.edu/home/teams-stats/. Beyond that I don't know of any further validation being available from PG. However the folding client does keep a current log of work, and by default the 16 most recent log files in the F@H data directory. Would those log files be sufficient?
Out of curiosity: what and how did you explained that ? Most of the time my rig is folding I have to go to work to pay for the power bill (and milk, rice, bread, ...)nobomode wrote:something I made sure to make clear to my command when I explained to them how folding@home works and what my actual contribution is.
I told them I physically do nothing and in its simplest form I donate a resource. They were quick to make the same point that my computer is really the one putting in hours. I compared me running a program with the huge number of sailors who show up at Navy events just to add to the size of the event. They literally stand around and if their hours count I didn't understand why mine wouldn't as well. They really didn't have a counter point and agreed as long as I could get something in writing they would count these hours. Obviously these hours will not hold the same weight as someone who might have built a homeless shelter with their bare hands but it shows that I at least put some thought and effort into representing the Navy in a positive manor. This community service isn't court ordered or anything like that. Its not super strict and it wont hurt my career if I don't volunteer but it certainly helps me if I do.ChristianVirtual wrote:Out of curiosity: what and how did you explained that ? Most of the time my rig is folding I have to go to work to pay for the power bill (and milk, rice, bread, ...)nobomode wrote:something I made sure to make clear to my command when I explained to them how folding@home works and what my actual contribution is.
Yes, in this case you could log your time spent researching the topic, speaking/writing about the topic and setting up and maintaining your system. In this case you would have to declare this log as accurate (however this is acceptable to your system). I do suspect this will need to be argued strongly as it is is not the kind of community service your employer envisioned when they set the rules. Hours used by your computer really make no sense in this respect as say 100 hours on a old laptop cannot compare with the science produced by a modern high powered GPU in a similar time. Although your comparison with sailors standing around is a nice barrack room lawyer ploy, I suspect it will be recognized as such...ChristianVirtual wrote:A boost in validation could be (a wild guess from my side) if you spend time to active explain F@H to your peers, help them with setup, maybe create a new team for which they all fold for. That could demonstrate some kind of leadership, communication skills and helps the science on the fly.