GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs [New GPUs.txt]

Post requests to add new GPUs to the official whitelist here.

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

yeenoghu
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:28 am

GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs [New GPUs.txt]

Post by yeenoghu »

I was previously folding on a GTX 780, and just installed a GTX Titan X and tried to start folding. However, no GPU slot is configured and when I try to add it, no slot is configured. Do I need to wait for an update to FAH to see the Titan X?
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by 7im »

Reinstall the fah client so it can detect the change in hardware. Titan X has been supported a long time already. No updated software needed.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
yeenoghu
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:28 am

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by yeenoghu »

I reinstalled the FAH client but no change. The Titan X was just released the other day, and is a GM200 GPU.

Edit: Just reinstalled again, trying to add a GPU slot returns "No available GPUs"
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by bruce »

First, be sure you're installed the latest drivers. Then report the hardware codes which can be found using lspci or GPUz or several other possible sources, including the utility from the hardware manufacturer.
yeenoghu
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:28 am

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by yeenoghu »

I'm running 347.88 drivers which are the newest to support the Titan X and here is the output of GPUz:

Image
artoar_11
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:42 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD R7 3700X @ 4.0 GHz; ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING; DDR4 2x8GB @ 3.0 GHz; GByte RTX 3060 Ti @ 1890 MHz; Fortron-550W 80+ bronze; Win10 Pro/64
Location: Bulgaria/Team #224497/artoar11_ALL_....

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by artoar_11 »

7im wrote:Reinstall the fah client so it can detect the change in hardware. Titan X has been supported a long time already. No updated software needed.
Titan X is a new GPU, release date - March 17.2015.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by 7im »

Sorry, confused with Titan Z added a year ago. :roll:
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by 7im »

Delete the GPUs.txt file so the client downloads the new one I just updated and published.
Or grab a copy from here.

Would be cool to see some benchmarks using FAHBench.

FAHBench info.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Sn1ken
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:58 pm

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by Sn1ken »

Image

Image

Image
Image
yeenoghu
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:28 am

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by yeenoghu »

Excellent, the new GPUs.txt got it working!

I ran FAHBench under stock clocks (boost at 1189MHz) using OpenCL and got the following:

Explicit Single Precision: 77.8121 ns/day
Implicit Single Precision: 336.337 ns/day
Explicit Double Precision: 6.96 ns/day
Sn1ken
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 12:58 pm

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by Sn1ken »

PPD on each WU?
Image
yeenoghu
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:28 am

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by yeenoghu »

I'm getting about 375k PPD with the Titan X right now. Project 9201 with 1:29 TPF. PPD is fluctuating a little so I'll run it for a day or so and see what it averages.

Edit: TPF down to 1:27.
PS3EdOlkkola
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:48 pm
Hardware configuration: 10 SMP folding slots on Intel Phi "Knights Landing" system, configured as 24 CPUs/slot
9 AMD GPU folding slots
31 Nvidia GPU folding slots
50 total folding slots
Average PPD/slot = 459,500
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by PS3EdOlkkola »

Running two Titan X's @ 1.24 GHz GPU clock on an Gigabyte Z97X, i7-4790K @ 4GHz, Win7 x64.

On Project 9411 with 3:32 TPF produces 402,407 PPD on each via HFM v0.9.3, 18% through both work units.

Afterburner shows GPU utilization between 86% and 88%. Temps 63 to 64 Deg C
Image
Hardware config viewtopic.php?f=66&t=17997&p=277235#p277235
ThePretzelGuy
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:53 pm
Hardware configuration: ASUS P8Z77WS-3770K >2x8GB Mushkin Redline 1600 > CM 212+ Cooler > MSI TwinFrozr GTX680 2GB & GTX660Ti MSI TwinFrozr 2GB @stock > Samsung 840Pro 256GB > WD 2TB Caviar Black > 2x ASUS DVD > Seasonic Platinum 1000W > Win7 Pro x64
> CM HAF X Full Tower
[img]http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/sigs/sigimage.php?u=629111&a
mp;bg=1[/img]


Data talks, Opinions walk!

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by ThePretzelGuy »

Which of the FAHBench tests correlates best with PPD?
For some reason I have in the back of my head that the single precison implicit is the best but I can't remember why.
anyone?
Image

Data talks, Opinions walk!
mdk777
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:12 am

Re: GTX Titan X, no supported GPUs

Post by mdk777 »

single precision explicit ...

But past performance is no guarantee..

FAHBENCH has not been updated for some time.

It does not predict how future cores will utilize an architecture.

Is Core 18 and core 19 predominately single precision ? IDK.

You could ask on reddit...but responses have been coming at the rate of every other month.
Transparency and Accountability, the necessary foundation of any great endeavor!
Post Reply