Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientifically

A forum for discussing FAH-related hardware choices and info on actual products (not speculation).

Moderator: Site Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by 7im »

Which fah project number would that be?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
P5-133XL
Posts: 2948
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
Hardware configuration: Machine #1:

Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).

Machine #2:

Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.

Machine 3:

Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32

I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD
Location: Salem. OR USA

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by P5-133XL »

Grandpa_01 wrote: More like tripple, the projects I run that use AVX generrally run about 3 time as fast as when AVX is not used on the same project.
I didn't know that there were any folding projects/cores using AVX. I think that newest GROMACS version is now AVX capable but I didn't know that any of the folding cores had been converted so as to use it. The NaCl core is by far the newest GROMACS core and I don't know if it even uses the AVX capabilities. Perhaps you are using the term "projects" in the more general (non-folding) definition.
Image
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by Grandpa_01 »

P5-133XL wrote:
Grandpa_01 wrote: More like tripple, the projects I run that use AVX generrally run about 3 time as fast as when AVX is not used on the same project.
I didn't know that there were any folding projects/cores using AVX. I think that newest GROMACS version is now AVX capable but I didn't know that any of the folding cores had been converted so as to use it. The NaCl core is by far the newest GROMACS core and I don't know if it even uses the AVX capabilities. Perhaps you are using the term "projects" in the more general (non-folding) definition.
I did not say fah projects I said other projects, just stating what the actual difference is with other cpu crunching intensive work. The speed up with AVX is huge and is also limited by memory the faster the memory the greater the speed up. AVX floods the memory and the memory can create a bottle neck. If fah develops a AVX capable client/core there is quite a potential for a very large and real speed up. Other projects have already done this and the results are quite impressive. :wink:
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by bruce »

Both SSE and AVX can provide excellent speed up of single precision floating point math. Most of the benefits of SSE could only be obtained with the help of an outstanding programmer. The current version of Gromacs is based on the work of one such programmer. AVX has more potential and a good compiler might do as well or even better, depending on many factors, but only relatively new processors and relatively new OSs have AVX support. Of course many are going to be comparing the speedup of AVX to ordinary x86 code and they can give more impressive numbers than if they were comparing AVX to code that is already highly optimized for SSE.

As long as FAH has to support Donors who do not have AVX support, the Fah infrastructure support will have to get more complex to support both. I don't have any realistic way to estimate what percentage of FAH donors still depend purely on SSE and how many have both AVX capable hardware running on an AVX capable operating system.
EXT64
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:54 pm

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by EXT64 »

NaCl uses a version of GROMACS that supports AVX, however I don't know if it is enabled (I would guess not as it is probably a generic compiled exe). There are also a lot of other improvements and speedups in newer GROMACS that all systems can take advantage of. How much of a boost AVX would bring depends on how cache and memory bound folding is (a linpack would get most of the full theoretical boost). My guess would be a decent jump, which may vary between projects (similar to how the GPU projects seem to be variably performing).
ChristianVirtual
Posts: 1576
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 12:14 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by ChristianVirtual »

To what I read most of the relevant OS support AXV2 and as for hardware Haswell upwards (AXV with SB upwards)

And the current BA was also made for a minority; my guess is that the base with AXV(2) capable systems is even bigger. Let's hope a "new" core 0xa7 or 0xa8 (wild guess on names) gives us that power.

Finding a good programmer to harvest that power is a challenge, I can understand.
ImageImage
Please contribute your logs to http://ppd.fahmm.net
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by 7im »

The 2x speed up already mentioned was conservative and specific only to FAH, because FAH is already so highly optimized for SSE.

Any old timers will recall the doubling of fah speed when we moved from the Pentium 4 to the Core 2 Duo. C2Ds could process twice the SSE instructions per clock cycle. AVX does approximately the same thing for fah, eventually.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Is GPU folding more valuable than CPU folding scientific

Post by bruce »

Old timers will also remember the ~3.5x speed-up when SSE optimizations were optional in Core_78 (out of a 4x theoretical maximum). That's when the real SSE programming work was added to FAH.
Post Reply