Fighting cancer on Folding@Home: EGFR

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

billford
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:46 pm
Hardware configuration: Full Time:

2x NVidia GTX 980
1x NVidia GTX 780 Ti
2x 3GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)

Retired:

3.2GHz Core i5 PC (Linux)
3.2GHz Core i5 iMac
2.8GHz Core i5 iMac
2.16GHz Core 2 Duo iMac
2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook
1.6GHz Core 2 Duo Acer laptop
Location: Near Oxford, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Fighting cancer on Folding@Home: EGFR

Post by billford »

n_w95482 wrote: In the meantime, lots of 9401's. Some of them have apparently been doing 117k PPD on my GTX 680, which is just crazy high (unless HFM/FAH aren't reporting it accurately).
I got strange results with 9401s on my GTX 650 Ti, PPD ranged from 27k to 40k… I was going to raise it as a WU issue, but had a read about it in the beta forum first- seems its normal for this project (although the reason is beyond my knowledge of protein molecules!).

Apparently the later runs (>600-ish) give a lower TPF, but they average out to about the same PPD as other projects. Which fits what I've seen here.


And when it finished the last 9401 it went back to 8900 :(
Image
n_w95482
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 12:46 am
Hardware configuration: CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X3D

GPU: Radeon RX 6700 XT, Radeon RX 6900 XT
Location: California

Re: Fighting cancer on Folding@Home: EGFR

Post by n_w95482 »

Yeah, I've seen my 680 vary quite a bit on various 9401 WUs, from my usual 70-80k to the 117k I mentioned earlier.

I did notice one of the WUs my 680 processed recently had a ridiculously low TPF and completion ETA, something like two hours or less to do the whole thing. I didn't note the PRCG details unfortunately.

At the moment, both my 570 and 680 are working on core 15 stuff. It's easy for me to tell what they're doing without turning on my monitor and examining the client or HFM - I just have to listen to the amount of fan noise :P.
Folding since December 2003. In memory of my mother, who lost her battle with cancer.

Image
Post Reply