FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Fah only uses SP. DP numbers posted just for reference.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Ah ok thx
Couldn't run DP on my 260 anyway , I'm sure it supports it though.......
I've pasted the error messages in my previous post.
Couldn't run DP on my 260 anyway , I'm sure it supports it though.......
I've pasted the error messages in my previous post.
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Thanks for your report, I have updated it. FYI, I did provide the data for an earlier version of FAHBench (viewtopic.php?p=239647#p239647).Assimilator1 wrote:Well I can't find out if my GTX 260 c216 does support O CL 1.1 or not *shrug*, so seeing as no one's given a benchmark for this oldie I will .
...
Please report any errors to me via a PM or post in this thread.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
No probs, & thx for the link , I see the numbers are fairly close, was your 260 a c216 version or 192? The numbers of cores makes quite a difference, worth adding that in the listing I reckon. Btw you never added your 260 to the list in that old thread.
Is there much difference in the stats between v1.0 & v1.2?
Btw do the 260s not do DP?
Is there much difference in the stats between v1.0 & v1.2?
Btw do the 260s not do DP?
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
- Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard - Location: Finland
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
They do, or at least should. They have CC (Compute Capability) 1.3, which is the first one to support DP. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA#Versi ... ifications for additional details. Having said that, CC 2.x (read: Fermi and newer GPUs) introduced a whole lot of additional features.Assimilator1 wrote:Btw do the 260s not do DP?
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
It was a 216 SP which was factory overclocked by Gigabyte.Assimilator1 wrote:...I see the numbers are fairly close, was your 260 a c216 version or 192?...
The thread was originally maintained by k1wi but later, k1wi was busy so it wasn't updated. Finally, a new version of FAHBench was released so I decided to start fresh.Assimilator1 wrote:...Btw you never added your 260 to the list in that old thread...
Yep, a major one:Assimilator1 wrote:...Is there much difference in the stats between v1.0 & v1.2?...
-Updated to use OpenMM 5.1 with significantly faster speed (http://fahbench.com/)
That translates to a huge improvement for GPUs folding (http://folding.stanford.edu/home/sneak- ... u-core-17/).
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
I guess fahbench needs CC 2.0 then seeing as I got the previously mentioned error?
Re speed up v1.0 vs v1.2, I guess that my 260 numbers vs yours were close because 260s can't use core 17?
I just discovered the 260 I have is a 55nm version ('only' had it a year or so, lol), so I'm guessing that should o/c quite a bit
Awesome speed up on MM 5.1 anyway!
Re old thread, didn't notice someone else had posted it, doh!
Re speed up v1.0 vs v1.2, I guess that my 260 numbers vs yours were close because 260s can't use core 17?
I just discovered the 260 I have is a 55nm version ('only' had it a year or so, lol), so I'm guessing that should o/c quite a bit
Awesome speed up on MM 5.1 anyway!
Re old thread, didn't notice someone else had posted it, doh!
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
AFAIK, OpenCL 1.1 is used by FahCore_17 which is based on FAHBench. Not sure how that relates to Compute Capability.Assimilator1 wrote:I guess fahbench needs CC 2.0 then seeing as I got the previously mentioned error?...
Assuming that the overclock was the same and the drivers used were too, it's possible that FahCore_17 uses different hardware that isn't present in Pre-Fermi GPUs thus, the difference isn't there as the code is skipped since it can't run.Assimilator1 wrote:...Re speed up v1.0 vs v1.2, I guess that my 260 numbers vs yours were close because 260s can't use core 17?...
I did mention it at the end of the list but I don't think that anyone would be interested in those results since they aren't useful with the latest FahCore_17 version.Assimilator1 wrote:...Re old thread, didn't notice someone else had posted it, doh!
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Let me remind everyone that when Drivers "support" OpenCL version X.x, that does not tell you whether it is limited to hardware that has feature F or if the drivers contain emulator code providing support that simulates feature F in older hardware at decidedly inferior performance.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
PantherX
Re old thread, that's not what I meant, I meant I hadn't realised someone else had started it.
My 260 isn't o/ced (yet) btw.
Re old thread, that's not what I meant, I meant I hadn't realised someone else had started it.
My 260 isn't o/ced (yet) btw.
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:15 pm
- Hardware configuration: Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS) - Location: UK, Surrey, Guildford
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
New benchmark.
ATI HD 5850 1GB, stock clocks, Cat 13.1, Win 7 64 bit, FaH Bench v1.2 - verify accuracy on
Open CL, SP
Explicit 11.1046 ns/day
Implicit 45.1101 ns/day
Open CL, DP
Explicit 3.66112 ns/day
Implicit 6.30671 ns/day
Going to run it on my C2Q @3.6 GHz too, think that might take a while so it'll be SP only!
ATI HD 5850 1GB, stock clocks, Cat 13.1, Win 7 64 bit, FaH Bench v1.2 - verify accuracy on
Open CL, SP
Explicit 11.1046 ns/day
Implicit 45.1101 ns/day
Open CL, DP
Explicit 3.66112 ns/day
Implicit 6.30671 ns/day
Going to run it on my C2Q @3.6 GHz too, think that might take a while so it'll be SP only!
Last edited by Assimilator1 on Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, 32 GB DDR4 3200, RX 580 8GB
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870 XT 3GB (DS)
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:06 pm
- Hardware configuration: Sys 1: I7 2700K@4,4GHz with NH-C14
8GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3 1866MHz CL 9-10-9-28
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3), various operating systems (WinXP, Ubuntu: 10.4.3 LTS, 12.04.2 LTS)
Optional: GTX560TI 448@stock/OC´d
Sys 2: I7 3930K@4,4GHz with Corsair H110
16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1866MHz CL 9-10-9-28
ASUS Ranpage IV Formula, Ubuntu 10.10
Sys 3 i7 875K@3,826 GHz with Scythe Mine2
8GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3 1866MHz CL 9-10-9-28
MSI P55-GD80, Win7 64Bit Pro
Sapphire Radeon HD5870@1,163V 900/1250MHz
Sapphire Radeon HD7870@1,218V 1200/1300MHz
Sys 4 i7 2600K@4,4GHz with Scythe Mine2
8GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3 1866MHz CL 9-10-9-28
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3), various operating systems (WinXP, Ubuntu: 10.4.3 LTS, 12.04.2 LTS)
Optional: GTX560TI 448@stock/OC´d
Optional:
ASUS P5Q Pro with Q9550
ASUS P5Q Pro with Q6300 - Location: Bavaria, Germany
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Gigabyte R9 290X Windforce 3X OC@1047MHz
C2D6300@2600MHz, Win7 Pro 64Bit, Catalyst 14.1 BetaV1.6
FAHBench1.2
OpenCL
Settings: Single Precision
Verify Accuracy
Explicit Solvent: 46.7955 ns/day
Implicit Solvent: 151.498 ns/day
Settings: Double Precision
Verify Accuracy
Explicit Solvent: 10.2063 ns/day
Implicit Solvent: 18.9532 ns/day
C2D6300@2600MHz, Win7 Pro 64Bit, Catalyst 14.1 BetaV1.6
FAHBench1.2
OpenCL
Settings: Single Precision
Verify Accuracy
Explicit Solvent: 46.7955 ns/day
Implicit Solvent: 151.498 ns/day
Settings: Double Precision
Verify Accuracy
Explicit Solvent: 10.2063 ns/day
Implicit Solvent: 18.9532 ns/day
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Few more for the list...
FAHBench1.2
Settings: Single Precision
GTX660 (327.23)
Explicit: 22.6831
Implicit: 91.9702
GTX660Ti (327.23)
Explicit: 29.4018
Implicit: 137.002
GTX750Ti (334.89)
Explicit: 20.5086
Implicit: 92.9817
FAHBench1.2
Settings: Single Precision
GTX660 (327.23)
Explicit: 22.6831
Implicit: 91.9702
GTX660Ti (327.23)
Explicit: 29.4018
Implicit: 137.002
GTX750Ti (334.89)
Explicit: 20.5086
Implicit: 92.9817
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
Rig details:-
* Sager NP9170/Clevo P170EM chassis
*Intel i7 Ivy Bridge 3610QM
*AMD 7970M
*16GB 1600MHz RAM
*256GB Crucial M4 SSD
*Windows 7 Ultimate
*F@H bench 1.2.0
With the last WHQL AMD drivers (13.12):
Implicit single precision: 74.8 ns/day.
Explicit single precision: 21.3 ns/day.
With the last Beta drivers (14.2 Beta 1.3):
Implicit single precision: 86.2 ns/day.
Explicit single precision: 25.1 ns/day.
FahCore_17.
Which places the mobility 7970M near the desktop HD 7870 on explicit and the GTX 570. Not too shabby
* Sager NP9170/Clevo P170EM chassis
*Intel i7 Ivy Bridge 3610QM
*AMD 7970M
*16GB 1600MHz RAM
*256GB Crucial M4 SSD
*Windows 7 Ultimate
*F@H bench 1.2.0
With the last WHQL AMD drivers (13.12):
Implicit single precision: 74.8 ns/day.
Explicit single precision: 21.3 ns/day.
With the last Beta drivers (14.2 Beta 1.3):
Implicit single precision: 86.2 ns/day.
Explicit single precision: 25.1 ns/day.
FahCore_17.
Which places the mobility 7970M near the desktop HD 7870 on explicit and the GTX 570. Not too shabby
Re: FAHBench (OpenMM 5.1)
update for OpenMM 6 in the works?
Transparency and Accountability, the necessary foundation of any great endeavor!