So you were thanked, you admit, but it the STYLE of the thank you, that wasn't good enough for you. Oh dear! What a calamity! Call out the National Guard - Viper97 has not been thanked in the manner with which he has become accustomed. It's a tragedy!Viper97 wrote:It's not the thank you's... it's the way they do it... as if it is secondary to their needs in my mind.
Could have fooled us!Viper97 wrote: I don't require thank you's.
Viper97 wrote: I do require stability and that is something we do not have here. I do require a road map and that is something not presented now or in the past. I do require that this be explained to donors in a matter that we donors can understand and if need be in lay terms. I see no explanation.
Reading comprehension is a must!
Viper97 wrote:I do see a plan and that plan has no explanation.
No explanation that you LIKE, you mean.
Well, we could work on that problem. Or we could do nothing and complain and moan and groan for yet another week. It's up to us, what we choose to do.Viper97 wrote:I see neither offered from PG a plan or a rationale for that plan.
The best analogy is a baseball one. You have a baseball club, and it has too many relief pitchers, and not enough starting pitchers. So you leave the best relief pitchers where they are, and put the rest into the starting rotation.
@sbinh: No. I'm not affiliated with PG in any way. In fact, I'm critical of the point system. But my critical view of the points system doesn't extend to all these vitriolic posts in this thread. Seems more like a FAH bashing conference, than a forum thread.