Isn't a "positive" view point in the eye of the beholder?k1wi wrote:Why shouldn't bruce, or any other user, be allowed to have and voice a positive opinion?mdk777 wrote:Well, again just for perspective:
Bruce attempts to explain and "defend" the current system. When we are discussing failures, or flaws in the current system, this can become counterproductive.
Attaching personal blame is likewise counterproductive. What needs to be addressed is the structure of the system.
Surely any debate about 'flaws' and 'failures' should allow comment from people who feel like there 'aren't any?'.
What you may consider positive I may not, like wise what I may consider positive you may not.
Is a lack of clear, precise and timely information from PG a positive thing? Is starting a thread in the beta section that had nothing to do with beta but all about ones views of the points being too high with BA's a positive thing?
Now I'm starting to sound like a broken record