Where are all the Core17 units?
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
On my GTX 660 Ti, I haven't gotten Core_17 on either normal or advanced for a couple of weeks or so (currently P8018 on Advanced, Win7 64-bit). That is OK with me if that is what FAH needs, but maybe it is a glitch (?).
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
How about you set all your slots to finish. Uninstall F@H (including the data files). Reinstall it and use the default settings for the GPU Slot (if they are correctly mapped to the physical GPU) and see what the result is.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Thanks, I tried that, but still picked up a Core_15 (P8018) on Advanced. It is no big deal for me, I will just wait until they get the server problem fixed, whatever it is.PantherX wrote:How about you set all your slots to finish. Uninstall F@H (including the data files). Reinstall it and use the default settings for the GPU Slot (if they are correctly mapped to the physical GPU) and see what the result is.
EDIT: I think I have fixed it another way. I set the Beta flag, and picked up a Core_17, and before it was finished I set the Advanced flag. It then picked up another Core_17 (P8900). So maybe it changed servers, or else identifies itself differently now?
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
I experimented yesterday...
(1) Following the advice posted earlier, I set one GPU slot to finish. After it was done I paused the other two and shut the client down. I restarted the client and then restarted the finished GPU slot which promptly downloaded a p8108.
(2) I then deleted all three GPU slots and dumped the p8108s, sorry I don't like doing that... uninstalled the client and deleted the data folder. Reinstalled the client which set itself up with 1 CPU slot and 3 GPU slots. All three GPU slots downloaded p8108.
(3) Deleted all of the slots and dumped the WUs, sorry again. I setup three GPU slots with the client-type beta flag. All three slots download p8900, strange because I don't think p8900 is a beta project. After the slots are running for a while I reset the client-type flag to advanced. Overnight all three slots finished the WUs and download three more p8900.
Conclusion? From what I see It seems that the client develops an affinity for a work server and you get work from that server. If p8108 is the highest priority right now then according to Pande I should have downloaded those overnight regardless of the flag setting.
Will be interesting to see how long I get p8900 before going back to p8108...
(1) Following the advice posted earlier, I set one GPU slot to finish. After it was done I paused the other two and shut the client down. I restarted the client and then restarted the finished GPU slot which promptly downloaded a p8108.
(2) I then deleted all three GPU slots and dumped the p8108s, sorry I don't like doing that... uninstalled the client and deleted the data folder. Reinstalled the client which set itself up with 1 CPU slot and 3 GPU slots. All three GPU slots downloaded p8108.
(3) Deleted all of the slots and dumped the WUs, sorry again. I setup three GPU slots with the client-type beta flag. All three slots download p8900, strange because I don't think p8900 is a beta project. After the slots are running for a while I reset the client-type flag to advanced. Overnight all three slots finished the WUs and download three more p8900.
Conclusion? From what I see It seems that the client develops an affinity for a work server and you get work from that server. If p8108 is the highest priority right now then according to Pande I should have downloaded those overnight regardless of the flag setting.
Will be interesting to see how long I get p8900 before going back to p8108...
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Thats a very bad way to experiment by abandoning work units! Anyone here could have told you there is no such thing as server affinity. Now all those wasted work units have to expire many days from now, slowing down the science. It also slows down each following generation in that line of work units because the next WU isn't sent until the wasted WUs get reassigned, completed and returned.
The Assignment Server simply reads your config and assigns work based on the server's weighting. See the Server Status page for the weight settings, and also the percent assigned column.
The Assignment Server simply reads your config and assigns work based on the server's weighting. See the Server Status page for the weight settings, and also the percent assigned column.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Yes I agree and I am sorry, however I can't help but feel that something is not working correctly. At a stretch from the first week of November through the first week of December I ran nothing but p8108 on all three of my GPUs, completing either 7 or 8 WUs per day. Concurrently, other members of my team folding with GPUs were seeing a mix of Core15 and Core17 WUs. At some point luck of the draw or priority no longer explains actual WU assignment in my case.7im wrote:Thats a very bad way to experiment by abandoning work units! Anyone here could have told you there is no such thing as server affinity. Now all those wasted work units have to expire many days from now, slowing down the science. It also slows down each following generation in that line of work units because the next WU isn't sent until the wasted WUs get reassigned, completed and returned.
The Assignment Server simply reads your config and assigns work based on the server's weighting. See the Server Status page for the weight settings, and also the percent assigned column.
I am not complaining and I will continue to donate my electricity and gear because I believe in the work. I also have skin in the game with cancer in the family and I worry about my children. I hope that cumulatively the work that gets done will save my kids some of the troubles our family has experienced in the past.
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Are you using the same client settings as your team members?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
7im wrote:Are you using the same client settings as your team members?
IDK, I will have to check.
Another question that comes to mind is the contribution choice (cancer, alzhiemers, etc). I selected cancer, how does that weigh into WU assignment?
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
AFAIK the choice is not yet fully implemented server side but there has been at least one other report that specifying a cause may result in not getting certain types of work. Try switching it to Any and see if that helps.
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Really? Was he a naughty boy? Did you tell him there was no such thing as server affinity? And how then do you explain his findings? There is significant evidence that clients do indeed get "stuck" on particular work.7im wrote:Thats a very bad way to experiment by abandoning work units! Anyone here could have told you there is no such thing as server affinity. Now all those wasted work units have to expire many days from now, slowing down the science. It also slows down each following generation in that line of work units because the next WU isn't sent until the wasted WUs get reassigned, completed and returned.
The Assignment Server simply reads your config and assigns work based on the server's weighting. See the Server Status page for the weight settings, and also the percent assigned column.
And your signature is not an excuse to be high and mighty.
single 1070
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
That is what I see, except that after getting the additional P8900 with the Advanced flag, it reverted back to a Core_15 work unit again.Blasko9 wrote:I setup three GPU slots with the client-type beta flag. All three slots download p8900, strange because I don't think p8900 is a beta project. After the slots are running for a while I reset the client-type flag to advanced. Overnight all three slots finished the WUs and download three more p8900.
So I get P8900 reliably only if I set the beta flag, even though it is not supposed to be a beta project insofar as I know. Whether that is being implemented by accident or on purpose by PG to ration the work units I don't know, but the simple thing to do is just set the beta flag. If there is a better way, I would like to know. (But I think I will go back to Advanced, and see if I get a mix of work units or not.)
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Specific servers may be listed as having multiple projects. This information is shown on the project summary page. Although the project summary is designed to automatically stop showing projects when a specific server is non-functional, it doesn't do a very good job of suspending the listings of projects which may have zero WUs to assign. (I don't know why.)
The server status page shows which servers are active and gives information about how many WUs are available. Information is also given about whether the server is configured for standard FAH projects, for Adv projects, for Beta projects, and perhaps Internal projects as well as the platform (operating system) for which it's configured. Unfortunately it's impossible to know how many WUs fall into those classifications.
P8900 is the only project being assigned by 171.64.65.69. That server is configured for the possible assignments to assign projects from to Windows or Linux requesting Advanced, Beta or Internal projects or to Windows for FAH projects. Many of those seven possibilities may have WUs and many may not. About the only useful information found there is that a Linux requesting a FAH assignment (i.e.: non-beta, non-adv) won't get one. P8900 may be moved from one classification to another without any visible changes.
Other GPU servers that are assigning work include 171.67.108.44, 171.67.108.11, 171.67.108.21, and 171.67.108.142 but the first three have only low priority projects so you won't get any of those projects unless you have a GPU that can't be accommodated by 171.64.65.69 or 171.67.108.142 so p8018 may be the only other non-beta project available to certain type(s) of GPUs.
I believe these statements are accurate at the time I looked at the data. I do not have access to a history log indicating if any applicable projects were added or went out of service recently, which might be especially important if the changes were brief.
With selections that limited, concluding specific "facts" about the assignment process won't produce reliable conclusions.
The server status page shows which servers are active and gives information about how many WUs are available. Information is also given about whether the server is configured for standard FAH projects, for Adv projects, for Beta projects, and perhaps Internal projects as well as the platform (operating system) for which it's configured. Unfortunately it's impossible to know how many WUs fall into those classifications.
P8900 is the only project being assigned by 171.64.65.69. That server is configured for the possible assignments to assign projects from to Windows or Linux requesting Advanced, Beta or Internal projects or to Windows for FAH projects. Many of those seven possibilities may have WUs and many may not. About the only useful information found there is that a Linux requesting a FAH assignment (i.e.: non-beta, non-adv) won't get one. P8900 may be moved from one classification to another without any visible changes.
Other GPU servers that are assigning work include 171.67.108.44, 171.67.108.11, 171.67.108.21, and 171.67.108.142 but the first three have only low priority projects so you won't get any of those projects unless you have a GPU that can't be accommodated by 171.64.65.69 or 171.67.108.142 so p8018 may be the only other non-beta project available to certain type(s) of GPUs.
I believe these statements are accurate at the time I looked at the data. I do not have access to a history log indicating if any applicable projects were added or went out of service recently, which might be especially important if the changes were brief.
With selections that limited, concluding specific "facts" about the assignment process won't produce reliable conclusions.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:48 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
While Nvidia seems to have problems getting P8900-wu's, they atleast appears to get a steady supply of other GPU-work. :zzzzzzz:
For Amd on the other hand, was sure there was roughly 1100 active Amd's last week, but now it's dropped to only 326.
So is this a problem with the stats for Amd-cards, a lack of work or another reason?
For Amd on the other hand, was sure there was roughly 1100 active Amd's last week, but now it's dropped to only 326.
So is this a problem with the stats for Amd-cards, a lack of work or another reason?
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Your guess is as good as mine ... unless we start getting reports from donors who are failing to get work.Rattledagger wrote:So is this a problem with the stats for Amd-cards, a lack of work or another reason?
Remember to compare the anticipated duration of a WU on specific hardware with the timeout that drops GPUs out of the active category. (I would have to look up those numbers before making an educated guess.)
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
Re: Where are all the Core17 units?
Can I ask where you are getting that stat? If true (and I'm not doubting you) that is incredibly low.Rattledagger wrote: For Amd on the other hand, was sure there was roughly 1100 active Amd's last week, but now it's dropped to only 326.
single 1070