p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
rickoic
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:49 pm
Hardware configuration: eVga x299 DARK 2070 Super, eVGA 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 2080 Super
MSI x399 eVga 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 1070, GT970
Location: Mississippi near Memphis, Tn

p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by rickoic »

Work unit apparently froze around 98% for 8 date/time checks. Paused it and restarted it and it picked up. Is this something to be on the outlook for frequently?

Code: Select all

*********************** Log Started 2013-05-16T22:05:26Z ***********************
22:05:28:WU00:FS04:Starting
22:05:28:WU00:FS04:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Rick/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5756 -checkpoint 15 -np 8
22:05:28:WU00:FS04:Started FahCore on PID 4996
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:Core PID:1628
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:FahCore 0xa3 started
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:*------------------------------*
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation
22:05:32:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Ensuring status. Please wait.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations...
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Working with standard loops on this execution.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Previous termination of core was improper.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Going to use standard loops.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Files status OK
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Expanded 3849801 -> 4382860 (decompressed 113.8 percent)
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=3849801 data_size=4382860, decompressed_data_size=4382860 diff=0
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Digital signature verified
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Project: 8568 (Run 0, Clone 8, Gen 7)
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Entering M.D.
22:05:49:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Using Gromacs checkpoints
22:05:49:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
22:05:54:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Resuming from checkpoint
22:05:54:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.log
22:05:56:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.trr
22:05:56:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.edr
22:05:57:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 483225 out of 500000 steps  (96%)
22:57:12:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 485000 out of 500000 steps  (97%)
23:24:25:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 490000 out of 500000 steps  (98%)
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations...
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Working with standard loops on this execution.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Previous termination of core was improper.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Going to use standard loops.
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Files status OK
22:05:42:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Expanded 3849801 -> 4382860 (decompressed 113.8 percent)
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=3849801 data_size=4382860, decompressed_data_size=4382860 diff=0
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Digital signature verified
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Project: 8568 (Run 0, Clone 8, Gen 7)
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
22:05:43:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Entering M.D.
22:05:49:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Using Gromacs checkpoints
22:05:49:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
22:05:54:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Resuming from checkpoint
22:05:54:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.log
22:05:56:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.trr
22:05:56:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.edr
22:05:57:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 483225 out of 500000 steps  (96%)
22:57:12:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 485000 out of 500000 steps  (97%)
23:24:25:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 490000 out of 500000 steps  (98%)
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
******************************** Date: 17/05/13 ********************************
19:41:13:FS04:Paused
19:41:13:FS04:Shutting core down
19:41:16:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Client no longer detected. Shutting down core 
19:41:16:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
19:41:16:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: CLIENT_DIED
19:41:16:WU00:FS04:FahCore returned: INTERRUPTED (102 = 0x66)
19:41:28:FS04:Unpaused
19:41:28:WU00:FS04:Starting
19:41:28:WU00:FS04:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/Rick/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 702 -lifeline 5756 -checkpoint 15 -np 8
19:41:28:WU00:FS04:Started FahCore on PID 36356
19:41:28:WU00:FS04:Core PID:34404
19:41:28:WU00:FS04:FahCore 0xa3 started
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:*------------------------------*
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations...
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Files status OK
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Expanded 3849801 -> 4382860 (decompressed 113.8 percent)
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=3849801 data_size=4382860, decompressed_data_size=4382860 diff=0
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:- Digital signature verified
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Project: 8568 (Run 0, Clone 8, Gen 7)
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available.
19:41:29:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Entering M.D.
19:41:35:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Using Gromacs checkpoints
19:41:35:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
19:48:10:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Resuming from checkpoint
19:48:10:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.log
19:48:10:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.trr
19:48:10:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Verified 00/wudata_01.edr
19:48:55:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 492865 out of 500000 steps  (98%)
19:48:56:WARNING:WU00:FS04:Detected clock skew (7 mins 27 secs), adjusting time estimates
20:18:38:WU00:FS04:0xa3:Completed 495000 out of 500000 steps  (99%)
I'm folding because Dec 2005 I had radical prostate surgery.
Lost brother to spinal cancer, brother-in-law to prostate cancer.
Several 1st cousins lost and a few who have survived.
Top
rickoic
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:49 pm
Hardware configuration: eVga x299 DARK 2070 Super, eVGA 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 2080 Super
MSI x399 eVga 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 1070, GT970
Location: Mississippi near Memphis, Tn

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by rickoic »

Noticed that it's saying Estimated TPF 2.11 days right now and from 20:18:38 to right now 20:45:00 its only completed 99.01%.
Does this sound like a wu gone bad? Will continue to let it fold to see what happends.
Tks
Rick
I'm folding because Dec 2005 I had radical prostate surgery.
Lost brother to spinal cancer, brother-in-law to prostate cancer.
Several 1st cousins lost and a few who have survived.
Top
rickoic
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:49 pm
Hardware configuration: eVga x299 DARK 2070 Super, eVGA 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 2080 Super
MSI x399 eVga 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 1070, GT970
Location: Mississippi near Memphis, Tn

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by rickoic »

Never mind. Just finished up a minute later at 100% and has been sent back.

Tks
Rick
I'm folding because Dec 2005 I had radical prostate surgery.
Lost brother to spinal cancer, brother-in-law to prostate cancer.
Several 1st cousins lost and a few who have survived.
Top
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8158
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by Joe_H »

rick1941 wrote:Work unit apparently froze around 98% for 8 date/time checks. Paused it and restarted it and it picked up. Is this something to be on the outlook for frequently?
I have never seen that happen myself, and there are very few reports of similar things happening to other folders. So normally you should not be seeing this happen. One thing that will cause this kind of thing to happen is if your system slows the processor or puts it into sleep or hibernate mode when it detects no user activity at the keyboard or mouse. To keep that from happening takes adjusting the system to maximum performance in the power settings.
rick1941 wrote:Noticed that it's saying Estimated TPF 2.11 days right now and from 20:18:38 to right now 20:45:00 its only completed 99.01%.
Does this sound like a wu gone bad? Will continue to let it fold to see what happends.
No, more likely that the system has slept. The estimated time also takes a while to catch up after a restart, it probably is still using all of those time periods when little to no processing was done on the WU.
Image
Top
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:
Contact 7im

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by 7im »

If it doesn't error out, it looks more like some other program was using all the CPU cycles during that period.

Also, I don't see how 8 of those date log entries can all have the same date. That data line gets logged every 6 hours, and you should never see more than 4-5 of those entries in a day. Very strange.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Top
rickoic
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 4:49 pm
Hardware configuration: eVga x299 DARK 2070 Super, eVGA 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 2080 Super
MSI x399 eVga 2080, eVga 1070, eVga 1070, GT970
Location: Mississippi near Memphis, Tn

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by rickoic »

7im wrote:If it doesn't error out, it looks more like some other program was using all the CPU cycles during that period.

Also, I don't see how 8 of those date log entries can all have the same date. That data line gets logged every 6 hours, and you should never see more than 4-5 of those entries in a day. Very strange.
I don't know either. Was using some OCR software intermittently during that time, but not full time. And my 3 gpu's didn't seem to miss a beat during that time period.


Anyway the wu finished and was sent back to Stanford, so its in their ballpark now.

Tks
Rick
I'm folding because Dec 2005 I had radical prostate surgery.
Lost brother to spinal cancer, brother-in-law to prostate cancer.
Several 1st cousins lost and a few who have survived.
Top
bruce
Posts: 20822
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: p8568 (run 0,clone 8, gen 7)

Post by bruce »

OCR software typically uses one or more CPUs very heavily. Folding by CPUs is intentionally set at an extremely low priority so as to not interfere with "normal" processing (including your OCR). Even if the foreground processing only uses one CPU, folding on CPUs only progresses at the rate of the slowest of the threads so OCR might have locked out FAH while it was running. If you plan to do that sort of thing again, you might be better off to reduce the number of CPUs allocated to FAH and leave plenty of resources for other heavy tasks. Changing the number of CPUs in the middle of an assignment can cause problems and it's not recommended. It's better to anticipate or to wait.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Issues with a specific WU”