Fermi vs Kepler

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
Hellmel
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:23 pm

Fermi vs Kepler

Post by Hellmel »

Just wondering if my collection of fermi's are almost obsolete? Is the new core going to be optimized for them as well as they have for the Keplers, or is it time for me to start upgrading them. I don't have a large contribution, but I like to keep it current. Unless the core will be optimized for Fermi's as well. I have 8 GPU's that would need to be replaced. Any ideas would be appreciated. Currently running four GTX 570SC's three GTS 450's and one GTX 460.
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Fermi vs Kepler

Post by PantherX »

Welcome to the F@H Forum Hellmel,

Please note that the FahCore_17 is currently being Beta Tested so any suggestions are subjected to change and can be speculative. I would advise you to wait and see how the QRB (Quick Return Bonus) pans out with the new Projects running FahCore_17.

AFAIK, the 400 Series do use significant amount of power so if you want to be more efficient and save some money on the electric bill, you could start by upgrading those GPUs to the more power efficient ones.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
tlg
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:26 pm
Hardware configuration: Mobile:
i7 3610QM @ 2.3GHz
nVIDIA GTX 630m (not folding)
8GB Ram
Win 7 x64

Desktop:
i7 860 @ 2.8GHz
Asus nVIDIA GTX 660ti
8GB RAM
Win 7 x64
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: Fermi vs Kepler

Post by tlg »

From my understanding, the AMD cards have blown past the nVidia cards just because of their acceptance of OpenMM. This may change, but the 7970 is gtetting 100k+ a day with QRB. Again this is just what I've read here.
It's not a retreat, it's a Tactical Withdrawal. Get it right!
AndyE
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:52 pm

Re: Fermi vs Kepler

Post by AndyE »

tlg wrote:From my understanding, the AMD cards have blown past the nVidia cards just because of their acceptance of OpenMM. This may change, but the 7970 is gtetting 100k+ a day with QRB. Again this is just what I've read here.
(As PantherX explained, things are subject to changes until the new core is final.)

For now, I can support your observation (running currently 4 GTX Titans and 4 AMD 7970 GE)

With stock frequencies,
the Titan average 120k with 160 watt/card
the 7970 average 95k with 180 watt/card

"Energy efficiency"
Titan: 750 PPD per watt (+41% vs. 7970)
7970: 530 PPD per watt

"purchase cost efficiency"
Titan: 1000$, 120 PPD / $
7970: 400$, 237 PPD / $ (+98% vs. Titan)

"3 yrs dedicated folding efficiency" (assumptions: purchase deprecated for 3 years, energy cost 12 cents /Kwh)
Titan: 80 PPD / $
7970: 98 PPD / $ (+23% vs Titan)

Please consider:
1) This is the best case for the Titan with these energy prices, as it is assuming dedicated folding
2) If the average % of folding time goes down, the case for the 7970 gets stronger
3) These numbers are based on the current beta work units. With other WU, these will probably change (in absolute terms).
4) The ratio between the cards might also change (due to potential different optimizations in the final version of the core)
5) Don't have numbers for the 450$ GTX 680

Things are in flux, treat it just as a current snapshot
artoar_11
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:42 pm
Hardware configuration: AMD R7 3700X @ 4.0 GHz; ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING; DDR4 2x8GB @ 3.0 GHz; GByte RTX 3060 Ti @ 1890 MHz; Fortron-550W 80+ bronze; Win10 Pro/64
Location: Bulgaria/Team #224497/artoar11_ALL_....

Re: Fermi vs Kepler

Post by artoar_11 »

I am a member of the beta team. I would advise you to wait. When do the final release of Core_17, we'll see which cards are better.
New software, optimization (drivers) sometimes change the behavior of the hardware. Nobody can predict it now.
Right move now to wait (waiting game).

(How long will it take: -- Soon ----- Soon-ish --) :)

And welcome to the F@H Forum Hellmel :D
Post Reply