Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
oroborous
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:16 pm

Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by oroborous »

on an ATI X1950 Uploaded May 16
Launch directory: C:\Program Files\F@H GPU
Executable: C:\Program Files\F@H GPU\fah6-win-gpu-console.exe
Arguments: -local -verbosity 9

[00:30:06] - Ask before connecting: No
[00:30:06] - User name: oroborous (Team 46590)
[00:30:06] - User ID: 13F0951F1C76DF9E
[00:30:06] - Machine ID: 6
[00:30:06]
[00:30:06] Loaded queue successfully.
[00:30:06]
[00:30:06] - Autosending finished units...
[00:30:06] + Processing work unit
[00:30:06] Trying to send all finished work units
[00:30:06] Core required: FahCore_10.exe
[00:30:06] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[00:30:06] - Autosend completed
[00:30:06] Core found.
[00:30:06] Working on Unit 02 [May 16 00:30:06]
[00:30:06] + Working ...
[00:30:06] - Calling 'FahCore_10.exe -dir work/ -suffix 02 -cpu 95 -checkpoint 20 -verbose -lifeline 6128 -version 601'

[00:30:07]
[00:30:07] *------------------------------*
[00:30:07] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[00:30:07] Version 0.10 (Mon Oct 30 12:32:17 PST 2006)
[00:30:07]
[00:30:07] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.10.3077 for 80x86
[00:30:07] Build host: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 vishal-gpu 1.5.19(0.150/4/2) 2006-01-20 13:28 i686 Cygwin
[00:30:07] Preparing to commence simulation
[00:30:07] - Looking at optimizations...
[00:30:07] - Files status OK
[00:30:07] - Expanded 86901 -> 443713 (decompressed 510.5 percent)
[00:30:07]
[00:30:07] Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)
[00:30:07]
[00:30:07] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[00:30:07] Entering M.D.
[00:30:13] Will resume from checkpoint file
[00:30:14] Working on 1258 p2744_GPUlambda
[00:30:15] Starting GUI Server
[00:30:19] Resuming from checkpoint
[00:30:19] Verified work/wudata_02.log
[00:30:19] Verified work/wudata_02.edr
[00:30:19] Verified work/wudata_02.trr
[00:30:19] Verified work/wudata_02.xtc
[00:30:19] Completed 66

[06:35:42] Completed 99
[06:46:45] Completed 100
[06:47:45]
[06:47:45] Finished Work Unit:
[06:47:45] - Reading up to 45408 from "work/wudata_02.trr": Read 45408
[06:47:45] - Reading up to 979228 from "work/wudata_02.xtc": Read 979228
[06:47:45] logfile size: 34654
[06:47:45] Leaving Run
[06:47:45] - Writing 1060362 bytes of core data to disk...
[06:47:46] Done: 1059850 -> 1024248 (compressed to 96.6 percent)
[06:47:46] ... Done.
[06:47:46] - Shutting down core
[06:47:46]
[06:47:46] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[06:47:49] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[06:47:49] Unit 2 finished with 65 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[06:47:49] Updated performance fraction: 0.800476
[06:47:49] Sending work to server
[06:47:49] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.


[06:47:49] + Attempting to send results
[06:47:49] - Reading file work/wuresults_02.dat from core
[06:47:49] (Read 1024760 bytes from disk)
[06:47:49] Connecting to http://171.64.65.20:8080/
[06:48:01] Posted data.
[06:48:02] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~77 kB/s
[06:48:02] - Averaged speed for that direction ~64 kB/s
[06:48:02] + Results successfully sent
[06:48:02] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[06:48:02] + Number of Units Completed: 27
can this be checked out please, thanks
user oroborous, team 46590
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by sortofageek »

I checked and don't see a result for you. Several others have returned that one, each for a very small partial credit. Nobody has yet received full credit for it.
ppetrone
Pande Group Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: Stanford
Contact:

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by ppetrone »

Again, thank you for this one guys!

paula
oroborous
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:16 pm

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by oroborous »

sortofageek wrote:I checked and don't see a result for you. Several others have returned that one, each for a very small partial credit. Nobody has yet received full credit for it.
thanks for the reply but its left me a bit puzzled.
why has no one whos returned that unit, myself included, not been credited with the points for it?
it didnt eue on my machine, pardon my ignorance but i dont understand

that machine returned another unit this am, could you check that one aswell please?

X1950 330 Project: 2725 (Run 8, Clone 749, Gen 0)
[08:48:42] + Attempting to send results
[08:48:42] - Reading file work/wuresults_03.dat from core
[08:48:42] (Read 1021929 bytes from disk)
[08:48:42] Connecting to http://171.65.103.159:8080/
[08:48:50] Posted data.
[08:48:51] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~110 kB/s
[08:48:51] - Averaged speed for that direction ~74 kB/s
[08:48:51] + Results successfully sent
[08:48:51] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[08:48:51] + Number of Units Completed: 28

if these units arent to be credited i dont see much point running that client in future
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by ChelseaOilman »

Hi oroborous (team 46590),
Your WU (P2725 R8 C749 G0) was added to the stats database on 2008-05-18 02:10:59 for 330 points of credit.
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by sortofageek »

oroborous wrote:
sortofageek wrote:I checked and don't see a result for you. Several others have returned that one, each for a very small partial credit. Nobody has yet received full credit for it.
thanks for the reply but its left me a bit puzzled.
why has no one whos returned that unit, myself included, not been credited with the points for it?
it didnt eue on my machine, pardon my ignorance but i dont understand

...

if these units arent to be credited i dont see much point running that client in future
The majority of completed WUs do get credited without intervention. This one, however, seems to be a problem. I am referring to the first one you mentioned: Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7) I noticed some strangeness when I looked at it in the database and did report it. Paula's post in this thread is intended to let us know she is reporting it to the appropriate researcher. I can't answer your question, but I am hoping someone from Pande Group will find out what is going on there.

Give them some time to look into it and, if you don't hear anything after a week or two, let us know and we'll check again for you. :)
oroborous
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:16 pm

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by oroborous »

ok thats great thanks, i'll keep an eye on it,
the second one i mentioned was credited fine
cheers
oroborous
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:16 pm

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by oroborous »

hi,
as a follow up to this,
as best as i can tell i dont believe this unit has been credited yet.
Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7) for 330 points
can you please recheck it?

thanks
ChelseaOilman
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: Colorado @ 10,000 feet

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by ChelseaOilman »

Hi oroborous (team 46590),
Your WU (P2744 R8 C185 G7) was added to the stats database on 2008-05-31 13:03:27 for 330 points of credit.
nwkelley
Pande Group Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by nwkelley »

great sounds like its resolved with full credit then? just let us know if i'm misunderstanding!
oroborous
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:16 pm

Re: Missing credit for Project: 2744 (Run 8, Clone 185, Gen 7)

Post by oroborous »

hi,
okay thanks for the info,
appreciate that :-)

regards
Post Reply