Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
road-runner
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Willis, Texas

Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by road-runner »

This dont seem right is something wrong with this unit or my machine? I will have to go check it if so... HFM saying credit 8567.9 PPD 5407.4

i7-920 3.75Ghz

Code: Select all

[00:20:15] Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)
[00:20:15] 
[00:20:15] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[00:20:15] Entering M.D.
[00:20:21] Mapping NT from 8 to 8 
[00:20:21] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0%)
[00:42:40] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1%)
[01:04:51] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2%)
[01:27:31] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3%)
[01:50:00] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4%)
[02:12:32] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5%)
[02:34:50] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6%)
[02:56:57] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps  (7%)
[03:19:27] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps  (8%)
[03:41:51] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps  (9%)
[04:04:19] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps  (10%)
[04:26:45] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps  (11%)
[04:49:13] Completed 60000 out of 500000 steps  (12%)
[05:11:41] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps  (13%)
[05:34:04] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps  (14%)
[05:56:31] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps  (15%)
[06:18:39] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps  (16%)
[06:41:01] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps  (17%)
[07:03:16] Completed 90000 out of 500000 steps  (18%)
[07:25:42] Completed 95000 out of 500000 steps  (19%)
[07:48:06] Completed 100000 out of 500000 steps  (20%)
[08:10:32] Completed 105000 out of 500000 steps  (21%)
[08:32:57] Completed 110000 out of 500000 steps  (22%)
[08:55:15] Completed 115000 out of 500000 steps  (23%)
[09:17:37] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps  (24%)
[09:40:10] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps  (25%)
[10:02:41] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps  (26%)
[10:25:13] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps  (27%)
[10:47:46] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps  (28%)
[11:10:11] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps  (29%)
[11:32:48] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps  (30%)
[11:55:19] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps  (31%)
[12:18:03] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps  (32%)
[12:40:35] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps  (33%)
[13:03:21] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps  (34%)
[13:26:12] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps  (35%)
[13:48:56] Completed 180000 out of 500000 steps  (36%)
[14:11:41] Completed 185000 out of 500000 steps  (37%)
[14:34:30] Completed 190000 out of 500000 steps  (38%)
[14:57:03] Completed 195000 out of 500000 steps  (39%)
[15:19:43] Completed 200000 out of 500000 steps  (40%)
[15:42:13] Completed 205000 out of 500000 steps  (41%)
[16:04:35] Completed 210000 out of 500000 steps  (42%)
[16:27:00] Completed 215000 out of 500000 steps  (43%)
[16:49:11] Completed 220000 out of 500000 steps  (44%)
[17:11:30] Completed 225000 out of 500000 steps  (45%)
[17:34:15] Completed 230000 out of 500000 steps  (46%)
[17:56:47] Completed 235000 out of 500000 steps  (47%)
[18:19:14] Completed 240000 out of 500000 steps  (48%)
[18:42:00] Completed 245000 out of 500000 steps  (49%)
[19:04:33] Completed 250000 out of 500000 steps  (50%)
[19:26:55] Completed 255000 out of 500000 steps  (51%)
[19:49:26] Completed 260000 out of 500000 steps  (52%)
[20:12:24] Completed 265000 out of 500000 steps  (53%)
[20:36:09] Completed 270000 out of 500000 steps  (54%)
[20:59:12] Completed 275000 out of 500000 steps  (55%)
[21:22:22] Completed 280000 out of 500000 steps  (56%)
[21:45:14] Completed 285000 out of 500000 steps  (57%)
[22:08:14] Completed 290000 out of 500000 steps  (58%)
[22:31:15] Completed 295000 out of 500000 steps  (59%)
[22:53:49] Completed 300000 out of 500000 steps  (60%)
[23:16:54] Completed 305000 out of 500000 steps  (61%)
[23:40:25] Completed 310000 out of 500000 steps  (62%)
[00:03:29] Completed 315000 out of 500000 steps  (63%)
[00:26:36] Completed 320000 out of 500000 steps  (64%)
[00:49:54] Completed 325000 out of 500000 steps  (65%)
[01:13:38] Completed 330000 out of 500000 steps  (66%)
[01:36:46] Completed 335000 out of 500000 steps  (67%)
[01:59:44] Completed 340000 out of 500000 steps  (68%)
[02:23:02] Completed 345000 out of 500000 steps  (69%)
[02:45:58] Completed 350000 out of 500000 steps  (70%)
[03:08:36] Completed 355000 out of 500000 steps  (71%)
[03:31:29] Completed 360000 out of 500000 steps  (72%)
Image
TheWolf
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:34 am

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by TheWolf »

Hi Road Runner long time to chat. How you been?

Something most defiantly looks wrong somewhere with a 22 min TPF for this project.
Are you GPU folding or doing anything else with this rig?

Here are the TPF from 2 of my rigs with SMP+GPU's folding:

Name: E5620-SMP @ 3.6Ghz
Number of Frames Observed: 261

Min. Time / Frame : 00:10:22 - 17,632.7 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:10:54 - 16,354.6 PPD


Name: P55 Extreme i7 860 @ 3.2Ghz
Path: \\P55-extreme\Folding\
Number of Frames Observed: 100

Min. Time / Frame : 00:11:45 - 14,612.4 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:11:54 - 14,337.0 PPD
TheWolf
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:34 am

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by TheWolf »

If the rig got shut down while folding it could have started in fale safe reduced mode 'Not running at optimized settings"
Stop fah add -forceasm flag to your shortcut to see if that will put it back on track.
Your TPF should be about half what its doing at the moment so long as there is nothing else running to hold it back.
EXT64
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:54 pm

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by EXT64 »

Check for other running processes that might be stealing CPU cycles and try rebooting.
road-runner
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Willis, Texas

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by road-runner »

Been doing good, no its a linux dedicated folder smp only... Guess I need to go check it see whats up its a flaming blade board kinda flaky it had been off for awhile about a month since the last power outage I just booted it up a couple days ago and put it back to folding...
Image
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8158
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by Joe_H »

TheWolf wrote:If the rig got shut down while folding it could have started in fale safe reduced mode 'Not running at optimized settings"
Stop fah add -forceasm flag to your shortcut to see if that will put it back on track.
Your TPF should be about half what its doing at the moment so long as there is nothing else running to hold it back.
That should not be necessary, the newer cores do not need the -forceasm option as they do not have the alternate code paths available.
Image
road-runner
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Willis, Texas

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by road-runner »

I dont know whats going on with the goofy thing must be throttling or getting to hot I started backing off the overclock that it had been running and its picking up speed lol got it down to about 10 minutes a frame.. Gave it the one unit till I get time to check it out...
Image
bruce
Posts: 20822
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by bruce »

rr: do let us know what you eventually discover.
road-runner
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Willis, Texas

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by road-runner »

bruce wrote:rr: do let us know what you eventually discover.
Will do Bruce, I swapped out the memory right quick didnt make any difference as I figured it wouldnt.

May be the water block getting clogged and getting to warm water looks funky I havent changed it in years and didnt feel like messing with gkrellm or temp monitoring in linux.

Thinking about just setting it to stock clocks and buy a couple more nvidia cards but saw something about the code for the folding core going one direction and nvidia possibly not going that direction do you have any insight on that?

I think I will hold off and see what happens...
Image
bruce
Posts: 20822
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by bruce »

Whatever you saw about NVidia cards and a Linux core is premature speculation. Until something reaches the stage that it's ready for beta testing, there are still too many "what-ifs" that have not been solved. Not only are there unknowns about a possible FahCore that Stanford hopes to develop, but there are lots of unknowns about potential problems with the drivers that still have to be resolved.

It is impossible to predict what might be ready to release in a few days or many months from now. All we really know is that development work is on-going both by (in your case, NVidia) and by Stanford.
road-runner
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Willis, Texas

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by road-runner »

Sorry bruce forgot to add that I am using windows 7 with the video cards... I just hate to pick up a couple cards and in a few months wished I had gotten ATI/AMD cards..
Image
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 8551 (Run 0, Clone 9, Gen 121)

Post by PantherX »

road-runner wrote:...I just hate to pick up a couple cards and in a few months wished I had gotten ATI/AMD cards..
The future looks bright:
VijayPande wrote:...Once NVIDIA gets JIT into CUDA (which is in their roadmap), then we will likely release a pure CUDA core, which will help speed up NV GPUs, possibly making them faster than AMD GPUs in FAH...
Source -> viewtopic.php?p=240182#p240182
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Post Reply