EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
EXT64
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:54 pm

EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by EXT64 »

Computer has been running fine, before and after. i7 970 at complete stock, no GPUs currently running, SMP 10.

Code: Select all

11:58:06:WU01:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 7612
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:Core PID:8628
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:FahCore 0xa4 started
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:*------------------------------*
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Created dyn
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Files status OK
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Expanded 121590 -> 306920 (decompressed 252.4 percent)
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=121590 data_size=306920, decompressed_data_size=306920 diff=0
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Project: 7048 (Run 0, Clone 875, Gen 0)
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
11:58:06:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Entering M.D.
11:58:12:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 
11:58:12:WU01:FS01:0xa4:mdrun returned 255
11:58:12:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=25000000
11:58:12:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=25000000.
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:logfile size=6912 infoLength=6912 edr=0 trr=25
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:logfile size: 6912 info=6912 bed=0 hdr=25
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:- Writing 7450 bytes of core data to disk...
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Done: 6938 -> 2418 (compressed to 34.8 percent)
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:  ... Done.
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
11:58:16:WARNING:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:7048 run:0 clone:875 gen:0 core:0xa4 unit:0x000000020001329c5145032a33876442
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:Uploading 2.86KiB to 129.74.85.15
11:58:16:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 129.74.85.15:8080
11:58:17:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
11:58:17:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
11:58:17:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:News: Welcome to Folding@Home
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:Assigned to work server 129.74.85.15
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY cpu:10 from 129.74.85.15
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:Connecting to 129.74.85.15:8080
11:58:17:WU02:FS01:Downloading 131.11KiB
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Download complete
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Received Unit: id:02 state:DOWNLOAD error:NO_ERROR project:7044 run:0 clone:226 gen:2 core:0xa4 unit:0x000000060001329c51450123dc2eb232
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Starting
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/tpickeri/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCore_a4.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 703 -lifeline 3616 -checkpoint 15 -np 10
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 10508
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:Core PID:240
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:FahCore 0xa4 started
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:*------------------------------*
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Folding@Home Gromacs GB Core
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010)
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Preparing to commence simulation
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Looking at optimizations...
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Created dyn
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Files status OK
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Expanded 133743 -> 307092 (decompressed 229.6 percent)
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=133743 data_size=307092, decompressed_data_size=307092 diff=0
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Digital signature verified
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Project: 7044 (Run 0, Clone 226, Gen 2)
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Assembly optimizations on if available.
11:58:18:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Entering M.D.
11:58:24:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 
11:58:24:WU02:FS01:0xa4:mdrun returned 255
11:58:24:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=25000000
11:58:24:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=25000000.
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:logfile size=6918 infoLength=6918 edr=0 trr=25
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:logfile size: 6918 info=6918 bed=0 hdr=25
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:- Writing 7456 bytes of core data to disk...
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Done: 6944 -> 2424 (compressed to 34.9 percent)
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:  ... Done.
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:
11:58:28:WU02:FS01:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
11:58:29:WARNING:WU02:FS01:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72)
11:58:29:WU02:FS01:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:7044 run:0 clone:226 gen:2 core:0xa4 unit:0x000000060001329c51450123dc2eb232
11:58:29:WU02:FS01:Uploading 2.87KiB to 129.74.85.15
11:58:29:WU02:FS01:Connecting to 129.74.85.15:8080
11:58:29:WU02:FS01:Upload complete
bollix47
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by bollix47 »

Project: 7044 (Run 0, Clone 226, Gen 2) was successfully completed by another folder ... no failures reported.

Project: 7048 (Run 0, Clone 875, Gen 0) - no results in the database so far ... I'll mark it for follow-up.
EXT64
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:54 pm

Re: EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by EXT64 »

Interesting - such a quick failure (never really started) tells me either the download was bad (received garbage) or these WU really don't like SMP 10, though I had never heard 10 being a problem.
bruce
Posts: 20822
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by bruce »

Ten is 5x2 and I've never heard of a problem with 5. It could have been something else, but the Mods/Admins don't have any way to tell if the person that completed it used the same number of threads that you did or not.
Joe_H
Site Admin
Posts: 8158
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:41 pm
Hardware configuration: Mac Studio M1 Max 32 GB smp6
Mac Hack i7-7700K 48 GB smp4
Location: W. MA

Re: EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by Joe_H »

I have read a couple anecdotal reports of some WU's failing with a multiple of 5, but the last was well over a year ago. But there was never any good followup, so it could have been due to a different reason. Hard to say more without some way of looking inside the calculations in progress. So if 5 is ever a problem, it must be only very rarely and possibly only on specific WU's of a project
Image
bollix47
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: EUE on New Clones for 7048 and 7044

Post by bollix47 »

Another folder was able to successfully complete:

Hi xxxxx (team xxxxx),
Your WU (P7048 R0 C875 G0) was added to the stats database on 2013-04-15 00:12:12 for 3483.89 points of credit.

Report closed.
Post Reply