That's disappointing.proteneer wrote:New FAHCore will not have any of this.
I wanted to see this.Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situation
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Re: Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situa
I wanted to see this.-
Jesse_V
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
- Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4 - Location: Western Washington
Re: Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situa
I enjoy many of them too. But it doesn't make much sense to keep including them considering that core 17 isn't based on Gromacs.Stonecold wrote:That's disappointing.proteneer wrote:New FAHCore will not have any of this.
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
Re: Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situa
You mean core-17 Core released few days ago? Or next GROMACS based cores (like SMP A3/A4/A5)?proteneer wrote:New FAHCore will not have any of this.
AFAIK you work on GPU cores only. Or now you work on next SMP core as well?
-
Jesse_V
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
- Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4 - Location: Western Washington
Re: Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situa
viewtopic.php?f=66&t=23862&p=238501#p238496Mad_Max wrote:You mean core-17 Core released few days ago? Or next GROMACS based cores (like SMP A3/A4/A5)?proteneer wrote:New FAHCore will not have any of this.
AFAIK you work on GPU cores only. Or now you work on next SMP core as well?
GROMACS-based Core A4 is still going to be used for SMP work because it's really efficient at doing so.P5-133XL wrote:Core_17 does not use GROMACS and was written from scratch to be able to run both Nvidia and AMD using the same core. It is based on OpenCL and perhaps more to the point It does not use CUDA at all.
Proteneer Blog
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
-
P5-133XL
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
- Hardware configuration: Machine #1:
Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).
Machine #2:
Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.
Machine 3:
Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32
I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD - Location: Salem. OR USA
Re: Working on Giving Russians Opium May Alter Current Situa
That is making the assumption that OpenCL won't be the direction Stanford takes for their CPU work too. A single core for all GPU's and CPU's would greatly simplify the resources that Stanford needs to maintain the cores. Even if it isn't as efficient it may be worth it to them.