HFM.NET - Monitoring Application for Folding@Home v7

[mmonnin]

There is a WU History Viewer. Is that what you are looking for? Ctrl + H in HFM.

[PantherX]

What mmonnin says is correct. However, you will have to wait for at least 1 WU to finish before it can show up in HFM.NET and its Work Unit History.

[shunter]

Thanks - I'd forgotten about the Viewer (Ctrl + H) which is giving me enough detail for ther moment; and I'm getting the hang of the new combined log in F@Hv7 What I was used to was the Show/Hide Log/Queue Viewer using F8 key in HFM which only works for the current unit now and does not show any history - which is a shame.
Once I get the more familiar with F@H v7 I suppose I'd better move my other pcs over to it but don't understand the setting up yet.
Thank for the help,


.

[bruce]

Thanks - I'd forgotten about the Viewer (Ctrl + H) which is giving me enough detail for ther moment; and I'm getting the hang of the new combined log in F@Hv7 What I was used to was the Show/Hide Log/Queue Viewer using F8 key in HFM which only works for the current unit now and does not show any history - which is a shame.
Once I get the more familiar with F@H v7 I suppose I'd better move my other pcs over to it but don't understand the setting up yet.
Thank for the help.

For those who are unfamiliar with all the complexities of V7, the new V7 client that came out today has a Web set up that is MUCH easier. If you later choose to change an obscure setting or two, that's still possible with the Advanced Control program but that can easily be postponed.

[7im]

Thanks - I'd forgotten about the Viewer (Ctrl + H) which is giving me enough detail for ther moment; and I'm getting the hang of the new combined log in F@Hv7 What I was used to was the Show/Hide Log/Queue Viewer using F8 key in HFM which only works for the current unit now and does not show any history - which is a shame.
Once I get the more familiar with F@H v7 I suppose I'd better move my other pcs over to it but don't understand the setting up yet.
Thank for the help.

For those who are unfamiliar with all the complexities of V7, the new V7 client that came out today has a Web set up that is MUCH easier. If you later choose to change an obscure setting or two, that's still possible with the Advanced Control program but that can easily be postponed.

Advanced Control program, AKA FAHControl. Not sure why the naming isn't consistent...

[rhavern]

It appears that something has changed in 7.3.2, as all my GPUs are showing up in HFM as client type "Uniprocessor". The core in use is still correctly identified as "OPENMMGPU (2.25)".

[calxalot]

Slot types smp and uniprocessor have been combined into slot type cpu.
HFM will need to be updated.

[DrBB1]

I had reported problems with my Work Unit History file awhile back (http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 20#p228862) and I now have additional information that may explain the problem. I compared the WU History with my F@H log file reports of starting and ending WUs.

The time reported in the FAH is UTC-0. My home time zone is US Eastern time (UTC-5), so all times in the FAH log are 5 hours ahead of local time. The FAH log reports start and completion times accurately. The WU History Viewer also reports start time as UTC-0; however, it reports completion time as UTC-5, Eastern time, so completion time in the WU History Viewer is five hours earlier than the completion time recorded in the FAH log. In other words, if I add five hours to the completion time reported in the WU History, completion times match up with the FAH log. Start times always match up with no conversion needed.

@harlan357--is there an obvious reason why start and completion times are reported differently in the Work Unit History Viewer? Also is the inconsistency in the database or just the queries that result in the viewer reports? Anyway, I hope this helps solve the problem. Since I believe only one other person has mentioned it, I wonder if the problem is idiosyncratic to me? I have downloaded 595 several times and reinstalled it on two PCs with the same results. Best wishes.

[toTOW]

HFM doesn't like the new beta core for GPUs (core 17) : TPF, PPD, ETA and Core type are missing

[compdewd]

I had reported problems with my Work Unit History file awhile back (http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 20#p228862) and I now have additional information that may explain the problem. I compared the WU History with my F@H log file reports of starting and ending WUs.

The time reported in the FAH is UTC-0. My home time zone is US Eastern time (UTC-5), so all times in the FAH log are 5 hours ahead of local time. The FAH log reports start and completion times accurately. The WU History Viewer also reports start time as UTC-0; however, it reports completion time as UTC-5, Eastern time, so completion time in the WU History Viewer is five hours earlier than the completion time recorded in the FAH log. In other words, if I add five hours to the completion time reported in the WU History, completion times match up with the FAH log. Start times always match up with no conversion needed.

@harlan357--is there an obvious reason why start and completion times are reported differently in the Work Unit History Viewer? Also is the inconsistency in the database or just the queries that result in the viewer reports? Anyway, I hope this helps solve the problem. Since I believe only one other person has mentioned it, I wonder if the problem is idiosyncratic to me? I have downloaded 595 several times and reinstalled it on two PCs with the same results. Best wishes.

Go into Edit -> Preferences -> and uncheck "Allow Asynchronous Clocks" and see if that fixes it. HFM.NET may get one set of times from FAH and one from your computer clock which may be the reason the times are skewed. It's just a guess; I don't know if that will fix it, but it may be worth a try.

[DrBB1]

Thanks for the suggestion, compdewd. I have done this but will need to wait a couple of days until my next next WU can start. Will report back to share findings.

[msgclb]

I have a problem with HFM not displaying the GPU Core 17 data for TPF, PPD and ETA.
This is true for the HFM on the rig running the client and my main rig.
I'm using http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummaryC.html for my project download url.

I've seen posts where others are now successfully displaying the core 17 info.
I've completed 20 7662 WUs on my HD 6870 and at least once a day I have ran the Download Projects From Stanford option.
I know this WU is listed in the above url.

After a search I believe this url data is stored in the ProjectInfo.tab file located in the Appdata Roaming HFM folder.
I opened this file and found that the 7662 WU is listed.

I was using the Any CPU v0.9.1 but decided to see if the x86 v0.9.1 would correct my problem.
It didn't.

I would be grateful for any suggestions on how I can get the 7662 project to be correctly displayed on my HFMs.

Thanks.

[PantherX]

Please note that you can change it by doing the following:
Edit -> Preferences -> Options:
Calculate PPD Based on: Effective Rate

Do note that while the information appears correctly, the PPD, TPF, etc isn't stored in the WU History (at least on my system).

[msgclb]

That did the trick!
Thanks.

[War]

Whats the best way to have 2 or more computers in seperate huses to show in 1 HFM.NET client?
I did try dropbox the logfiles and show on a web brobser, but the files are named the same and only the last synked computer did show.
Pressing F5 and I did se different PPD based on the last computer updateing to dropbox.


Any way to get a remote computer to show up in HFM.NET in the client its selv on a random computer?
I have a static IP on the remote computer if that helps.