Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Moderator: Site Moderators
Forum rules
Please read the forum rules before posting.
Please read the forum rules before posting.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
- Hardware configuration: None
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Your thoughts? Your votes? I don't have strong preference, should I?
AMD: newegg wishlist
intel: newegg wishlist
Thanks!
tear
P.S.
And yes, I am also considering cheapest 3870s [still less money than 3870 X2].
AMD: newegg wishlist
intel: newegg wishlist
Thanks!
tear
P.S.
And yes, I am also considering cheapest 3870s [still less money than 3870 X2].
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Intel, because you can overclock it to +3 GHz (remember that some small WU are CPU limited ... so the better CPU you get, the better GPU will perform in this case)
But I don't know if it will be enough as the two GPU will use only PCIe 8x (we might need an official comment about this) ...
But I don't know if it will be enough as the two GPU will use only PCIe 8x (we might need an official comment about this) ...
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
- Hardware configuration: None
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Thanks toTOW.
Noted, though I usually do not overclock
tear
Noted, though I usually do not overclock
tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Ok, by the way, that's coherent with your choice of two 3850 instead of 3870 (which are more CPU limited)
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
If I bought a computer today, I'd have to go with a quad core rig, for the flexibility and "futureproofing". The wave of the future in all computing is toward multiple cores and parallel processing. The quads are not all that expensive now - and for the same processing power as two dual core CPUs you only have to buy one mobo, power supply, case, hard drive, videocard etc. Heh, I heard from one power folder that part of his reason for switching to quads is that his router table is getting full! Why not 8-way machines? Two quad processors and a server mobo together are too expensive for my hobby budget.
Speaking only as a long term Folder (and NOT in any official capacity, I'm just a peacekeeper here): As time passes the work units just get bigger and longer. When I first started in fall 2003 I folded my share of 33-point p241's and 20-point p729s, and the dreaded p1136 series TINKERs which took nearly 2 weeks to run on a 500 MHz PowerMac G4 and were worth 71 points (later upgraded to 241, IIRC). I started folding on a 700 MHz eMac which got (and still gets) 1 pph. It was somewhat below the mean for "Folding iron" when I started -- now it's falling off the low end of the equipment spectrum. Though the benchmark machine has changed, the current point structure is generally compatible with those older units, within a factor of 2 anyway. It's nearly 4 years since I started Folding, and I'm now routinely folding work units valued at 100x those early units. In another 2-3 years my dual-core machines, now a bit below the mean, will be low end in their turn. I might upgrade a low-end duallie (AMD 64 x2 3800, Opteron 165, Core Duo) to a higher speed processor but \right now I simply wouldn't build or buy new dual core machines.
Speaking only as a long term Folder (and NOT in any official capacity, I'm just a peacekeeper here): As time passes the work units just get bigger and longer. When I first started in fall 2003 I folded my share of 33-point p241's and 20-point p729s, and the dreaded p1136 series TINKERs which took nearly 2 weeks to run on a 500 MHz PowerMac G4 and were worth 71 points (later upgraded to 241, IIRC). I started folding on a 700 MHz eMac which got (and still gets) 1 pph. It was somewhat below the mean for "Folding iron" when I started -- now it's falling off the low end of the equipment spectrum. Though the benchmark machine has changed, the current point structure is generally compatible with those older units, within a factor of 2 anyway. It's nearly 4 years since I started Folding, and I'm now routinely folding work units valued at 100x those early units. In another 2-3 years my dual-core machines, now a bit below the mean, will be low end in their turn. I might upgrade a low-end duallie (AMD 64 x2 3800, Opteron 165, Core Duo) to a higher speed processor but \right now I simply wouldn't build or buy new dual core machines.
-
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 am
- Hardware configuration: Machine #1:
Intel Q9450; 2x2GB=8GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460; Windows Server 2008 X64 (SP1).
Machine #2:
Intel Q6600; 2x2GB=4GB Ram; Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Motherboard; PC Power and Cooling Q750 PS; 2x GTX 460 video card; Windows 7 X64.
Machine 3:
Dell Dimension 8400, 3.2GHz P4 4x512GB Ram, Video card GTX 460, Windows 7 X32
I am currently folding just on the 5x GTX 460's for aprox. 70K PPD - Location: Salem. OR USA
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
I'd definately go Quad Intel with a 3870.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
- Hardware configuration: None
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Many thanks for your input.
FWIW, machine's purpose is a dedicated FAH/GPU setup. That's where dual-core
idea came from (one core per GPU).
I also believe that today's mainstream machines should be good for two or so
years (fah-wise) and I think that either of two options gives some room
for future upgrades [shall they become necessary].
So... going dual-core saves me some money for, say... yet another
2x Xeon 53xx/54xx setup. That's my take at least.
tear
FWIW, machine's purpose is a dedicated FAH/GPU setup. That's where dual-core
idea came from (one core per GPU).
I also believe that today's mainstream machines should be good for two or so
years (fah-wise) and I think that either of two options gives some room
for future upgrades [shall they become necessary].
So... going dual-core saves me some money for, say... yet another
2x Xeon 53xx/54xx setup. That's my take at least.
tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Why limit yourself? Run 2 GPU, and also run 2 CPU clients.tear wrote:
FWIW, machine's purpose is a dedicated FAH/GPU setup. That's where dual-core
idea came from (one core per GPU).
And dual core GPUs seem to be following the trend of CPUs, so the extra 2 CPU cores of a Quad help to futureproof the system even more. And the price differences are small by comparison.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Am I the only one to wonder if PCIe 8x + 8x will be enough to feed to GPU or if he'd better go for a X38 motherboard with 16x + 16x
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:08 am
- Hardware configuration: None
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
As a datapoint, AGP 8x is enough to saturate [98-99%] 3850 [P4711-P4713] here.
And I suspect that we're going to see more high-atom WUs rather than
low-atom WUs.
tear
And I suspect that we're going to see more high-atom WUs rather than
low-atom WUs.
tear
One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:15 pm
- Location: Michigan
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
I built AMDs for about 10 years. That was my pre-FAH period. My sole dedicated folder is a Q6600. The new one I built for my mother, also to fold, is an E4500. I'm current shopping the parts for another Q6600, and thinking about replacing my current gaming box (X2 6000+) with an E8500.
Bang for the buck-
General use and midlevel gaming- AMD all the way.
Speed folding and heavy gaming- I gotta go with Intel, much as it hurts me to say so
I'll probably get slapped for saying it, but with a quad you have 2 cores for the GPUs, and still have an idle "dual core" for the SMP. It should still be as fast as, or faster than, my 6000+ on an SMP WU.
Bang for the buck-
General use and midlevel gaming- AMD all the way.
Speed folding and heavy gaming- I gotta go with Intel, much as it hurts me to say so
I'll probably get slapped for saying it, but with a quad you have 2 cores for the GPUs, and still have an idle "dual core" for the SMP. It should still be as fast as, or faster than, my 6000+ on an SMP WU.
Proud to crash my machines as a Beta Tester!
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:20 am
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Intel, but bust open the piggy bank and try to get the E7200.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: TeAm Anandtech
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
I'd replace the PSU with a Corsair 550VX or 650TX.
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
:slap: :slap:uncle fuzzy wrote:I'll probably get slapped for saying it, but with a quad you have 2 cores for the GPUs, and still have an idle "dual core" for the SMP. It should still be as fast as, or faster than, my 6000+ on an SMP WU.
The only problem with this idea is that as Stanford continues towards using all of the capatities that you're willing to donate. they may decide to give more difficult WUs to 4-core machines, compared to 2-core machines. (They've already been doing something like that, but not all of the time.) If your SMP machine tells the server that you have 4-cores, the server will not know that you've only got two of them available.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:44 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz - 9657AB, OCZ600SXS 2x8800GS 1x running GPU2, VM-Notfred SMP (2), Vista 32bit
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35V, EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
Q6600 G0 @3.0GHz -IP35E, Antec 650W. Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 B3 @3.0GHz - P5B-965 Deluxe EA430, Notfred SMP diskless
X3210 G0 @2.8GHz - GA-G31M-S2L EA380, Notfred SMP diskless
E6300 B2 @3.0GHz - GA-965P-DS3,, CP-500T, HD3870 GPU2, XP MCE
E2160@1.8GHz generic emachine, EA380, 9600GSO GPU2,1 CPU client, vista 32bit
P4@3.2GHz generic emachine, NEO380, 8800GT GPU2, XP MCE
Athlon64@2.2GHz - NFK8AB-RS, EA430, 8800GT GPU2, XP Pro 32bit - Location: Wichita
Re: Dual GPU folding -- AMD or intel?
Running SMP on a virtual linux machine (or the Notfred CD) through VMware takes care of that problem, doesn't it?bruce wrote: If your SMP machine tells the server that you have 4-cores, the server will not know that you've only got two of them available.