2012 slump?

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Nathan_P
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:22 pm
Hardware configuration: Asus Z8NA D6C, 2 x5670@3.2 Ghz, , 12gb Ram, GTX 980ti, AX650 PSU, win 10 (daily use)

Asus Z87 WS, Xeon E3-1230L v3, 8gb ram, KFA GTX 1080, EVGA 750ti , AX760 PSU, Mint 18.2 OS

Not currently folding
Asus Z9PE- D8 WS, 2 E5-2665@2.3 Ghz, 16Gb 1.35v Ram, Ubuntu (Fold only)
Asus Z9PA, 2 Ivy 12 core, 16gb Ram, H folding appliance (fold only)
Location: Jersey, Channel islands

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by Nathan_P »

As 7im says its mostly down to people re sizing their farms coupled with the economic situation and the really hot summer. If you look at team stats in the last week or so people are coming back as the weather cools off. Also lots of people have shut down lots of machines and gone for smaller setups using less power including me. I used to fold on 5 GPU and 2 SMP, now i fold on 1 bigadv and 2 SMP for less powe rand this will go down to 1 Bigadv and 1 SMP in the next month or so. I still have all my GPU's and would run them if i could afford to do so. You only have to look on the forum's of most of the teams to see that lots of people are in a similar situation
Image
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by 7im »

And even though V7 seems to report the number of active clients correctly (my does too), can we be sure the FLOPS counts are being reported correctly?

So even if the active client count is accurate and went down because people are running more concentrated clients (2 or 3 i7s instead of 10 dual cores) that would account for some of the client count dip without that being taken so pessimistically.

And if the FLOPS reporting is wrong, it may not accurately reflect that increase in concentrated power as it should. Can the FLOPS counter even go above a single core? Can it count to 4P? Or know how to read a kepler card? Or a new 7xxx series card? There may be whole chunks of unreported FLOPS...?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
mdk777
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:12 am

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by mdk777 »

And if the FLOPS reporting is wrong, it may not accurately reflect that increase in concentrated power as it should. Can the FLOPS counter even go above a single core? Can it count to 4P? Or know how to read a kepler card? Or a new 7xxx series card? There may be whole chunks of unreported FLOPS...?
Well, I asked a similar question around a year ago when there was a huge jump in the number of ATI GPU.

However, if we have so little confidence in the reported calculations, why are they even posted?

Assuming that they can't calculate and report the FLOPS of the project accurately, certainly does nothing for credibility and recruitment. :(
And hence the self-inflicted slump in participation could occur.

Real or imagined....bad press.
Any answers more than simple environmental, social, or economic issues are better suited for the "What's holding FAH Back" thread, not this one.
Referenced in my first post.

Assuming that a two year downward trend is a statistical aberration,environmental, or economical; presumes the answer to the question rather than investigating it.

I think the downward slump was predicted by many due to the management and structural decisions of the project. You might not agree, but limiting the investigation to preclude obvious factors does nothing to find true causation. :mrgreen:
Transparency and Accountability, the necessary foundation of any great endeavor!
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by k1wi »

I agree with mdk77's previous statement that total FLOPS and total active clients tend to track very closely (even accounting for the inherent 50/7 day lag associated with 'active' clients), though I would expect Moore's law to be more long term.
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by 7im »

mdk777 wrote: However, if we have so little confidence in the reported calculations, why are they even posted?
While flagrant pessimism may be your personal writing style, taking every statement I make to it's logical extreme is a fallacy and is not helpful to the discussion. You're just being argumentative.

I did not say that I had little confidence in the FLOPS numbers. I asked if it was possible that the FLOPS numbers haven't accounted for recent changes. I assumed it was a not large difference, but you assumed it was a large difference. "We" have have a difference in opinion about the confidence level. ;)
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
mdk777
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:12 am

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by mdk777 »

While flagrant pessimism may be your personal writing style, taking every statement I make to it's logical extreme is a fallacy and is not helpful to the discussion. You're just being argumentative.
I just wrote that I think it is possible to have 6 million rather than 6000 participants.

I don't know of any realist growth projection that could be more optimistic. :mrgreen:

However, it won't happen looking for rounding errors.
Transparency and Accountability, the necessary foundation of any great endeavor!
Ivoshiee
Site Moderator
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Estonia

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by Ivoshiee »

Active client count should go down with the V7, it is designed to replace numerous installations on the same system. Different thing is with FLOPS. If it does go up or remain the same then we are still okay.
PinHead
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:43 am
Hardware configuration: Quad Q9550 2.83 contains the GPU 57xx - running SMP and GPU
Quad Q6700 2.66 running just SMP
2P 32core Interlagos SMP on linux

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by PinHead »

Many people have moved from PC's to PAD's, Phone's or NetBook's. So the number of PC's / Laptop's per household is also reducing and upgrades are not occuring in those homes. Wife's laptop mostly sit's idle these days, she does it all from her phone. The change has been brewing for several years now.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by bruce »

Ivoshiee wrote:Active client count should go down with the V7, it is designed to replace numerous installations on the same system. Different thing is with FLOPS. If it does go up or remain the same then we are still okay.
Going back to the question I asked earlier: Is the number being reported is the number of cores running or something else. If I was running a v6 SMP client and GPU client, that counted as two. When I replaced the V6 software with V7 (with a SMP and GPU slot) does it count as one or two? I think it still counts as two.
Ivoshiee
Site Moderator
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Estonia

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by Ivoshiee »

bruce wrote:
Ivoshiee wrote:Active client count should go down with the V7, it is designed to replace numerous installations on the same system. Different thing is with FLOPS. If it does go up or remain the same then we are still okay.
Going back to the question I asked earlier: Is the number being reported is the number of cores running or something else. If I was running a v6 SMP client and GPU client, that counted as two. When I replaced the V6 software with V7 (with a SMP and GPU slot) does it count as one or two? I think it still counts as two.
The number has been as number of the FAH client installations. I do not know if the V7 should change it, it should not.
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by k1wi »

Ivoshiee wrote:
bruce wrote:
Ivoshiee wrote:Active client count should go down with the V7, it is designed to replace numerous installations on the same system. Different thing is with FLOPS. If it does go up or remain the same then we are still okay.
Going back to the question I asked earlier: Is the number being reported is the number of cores running or something else. If I was running a v6 SMP client and GPU client, that counted as two. When I replaced the V6 software with V7 (with a SMP and GPU slot) does it count as one or two? I think it still counts as two.
The number has been as number of the FAH client installations. I do not know if the V7 should change it, it should not.
Is there anyone who has a stable installation of V7 that can compare their count of active clients to their # of slots? Surely that would be the easiest way to go about it?

I would be willing to give it a go with a fresh & temporary username/team combination if it ends the speculation.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by Zagen30 »

I know for a fact that the number of active clients on the user page is equal to the number of active v7 slots, as for a long time I had 4 slots running across two v7 installations and that showed up as 4 active clients. What I don't know is if the OS stats are just reporting the sum of everyone's active slots (using the definition of "active" specific to each client type, of course) or if it's calculating active clients differently.
Image
bollix47
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Canada

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by bollix47 »

Yes, I have 11 slots running on 8 computers and the Official stats show 11 Active Clients.
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by k1wi »

Quick replies! So it would certainly appear that individually 1 v7 slot = 1 active 'client'.

Which, as you say leaves your uncertainty Zagen30: Does PG gather total stats by summing all the individual active counts or something along those lines. It also leaves the underlying question "Does the total stats page even include v7 at all?"

According to today's Client statistics by OS page the total number of active 'CPUs' is stated at 259,390. Summing the totals of each client type equals 254,823, which is 4,567 or about 1.8% short. I would imagine there are more than 4,567 v7 clients/slots in the wild? Perhaps the two totals are just measured at different points in time or maybe there is a small number of 'odd' client types still working away?

I don't think there is anyway anyone other than PG could answer these questions, but I would propose that if the answer is "v7 is not reflected in the overall stats and stats by OS" then they might want to get on that pretty quick? The bottom falling out of both total FLOPS & active participation just because the next generation client isn't being measured cannot be good publicity...

---
FWIW the difference between the sum of CPU type totals and total CPUs amongst total CPUs is 14%, I assume reflecting depreciated clients?
7im
Posts: 10179
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: 2012 slump?

Post by 7im »

k1wi wrote: ...cannot be good publicity...
Ya, so let's keep posting about it over and over and keep this topic on top of the list for everyone to see. :(

Let's call this a dead horse.
Let's wait for PG to address said horse.
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Post Reply