no credit for WU's complete

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
void4ever
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:00 pm

no credit for WU's complete

Post by void4ever »

I'm sorry if this is the incorrect area for this post, i wasn't sure if this board or the WU board was more appropriate.

I recently started folding with a Nvidia G210 using the V7 client. Before hand this machine was folding using the SMP client (dual core) without issue. I made no changes to the client except to add the GPU and remove the SMP. I also updated from ver .48 to .52 in hopes of fixing this issue.

The client and GPU appear to be running perfectly fine, it's completing WU's on avg of about 7 hours per unit. However it shows PPD as Unknown. When i check the logs I see no error's at all, however there is 1 line missing which is the "Estimated Credit" line after an upload. This explains why the PPD shows as Unknown since i'm not receiving credit for these WU's, but i can't for the life of me figure out why I'm not receiving credit.

Below i will post a section of log from the last WU completed.

Code: Select all

14:05:49:WU01:FS01:0x11:Completed 100%
14:05:50:WU01:FS01:0x11:Successful run
14:05:50:WU01:FS01:0x11:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Reserved 75712 bytes for xtc file; Cosm status=0
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Allocated 75712 bytes for xtc file
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:- Reading up to 75712 from "01/wudata_01.xtc": Read 75712
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Read 75712 bytes from xtc file; available packet space=786354752
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:xtc file hash check passed.
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Reserved 15168 15168 786354752 bytes for arc file=<01/wudata_01.trr> Cosm status=0
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Allocated 15168 bytes for arc file
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:- Reading up to 15168 from "01/wudata_01.trr": Read 15168
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Read 15168 bytes from arc file; available packet space=786339584
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:trr file hash check passed.
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Allocated 560 bytes for edr file
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Read bedfile
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:edr file hash check passed.
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Allocated 33325 bytes for logfile
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Read logfile
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:GuardedRun: success in DynamicWrapper
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:GuardedRun: done
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Run: GuardedRun completed.
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:+ Opened results file
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:- Writing 125277 bytes of core data to disk...
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Done: 124765 -> 99091 (compressed to 79.4 percent)
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:  ... Done.
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=01/wudata_01.ckp
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Shutting down core 
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:0x11:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64)
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:OK project:5765 run:10 clone:242 gen:3450 core:0x11 unit:0x79fb4f054fc853a60d7a00f2000a1685
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:Uploading 97.27KiB to 171.67.108.11
14:06:00:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.67.108.11:8080
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:Starting
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:Running FahCore: "C:\Documents and Settings\user\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" "C:/Documents and Settings/user/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/x86/NVIDIA/G80/Core_11.fah/FahCore_11.exe" -dir 00 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 2056 -checkpoint 15 -gpu 0
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:Started FahCore on PID 2464
14:06:01:Started thread 13 on PID 2056
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:Core PID:3724
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:FahCore 0x11 started
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:*------------------------------*
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Folding@Home GPU Core
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Version 1.31 (Tue Sep 15 10:57:42 PDT 2009)
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Build host: amoeba
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Board Type: Nvidia
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Core      : 
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Preparing to commence simulation
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:- Looking at optimizations...
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:DeleteFrameFiles: successfully deleted file=00/wudata_01.ckp
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:- Created dyn
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:- Files status OK
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:- Expanded 46648 -> 252912 (decompressed 542.1 percent)
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=46648 data_size=252912, decompressed_data_size=252912 diff=0
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:- Digital signature verified
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Project: 5768 (Run 8, Clone 216, Gen 3580)
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Assembly optimizations on if available.
14:06:01:WU00:FS01:0x11:Entering M.D.
14:06:01:WU01:FS01:Upload complete
14:06:01:WU01:FS01:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
14:06:01:WU01:FS01:Cleaning up
14:06:07:WU00:FS01:0x11:Tpr hash 00/wudata_01.tpr:  1656701147 2593984241 595680129 620856133 868916645
14:06:07:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:07:WU00:FS01:0x11:Calling fah_main args: 14 usage=100
14:06:07:WU00:FS01:0x11:
14:06:07:WU00:FS01:0x11:Working on Protein
As you can see i get the Upload complete, and the server respond like normal, but then no credit. Looking back at previous WU's when it was crunching SMP WU's it shows the Estimated Credit line after the Server Response.

Any ideas?

Void4ever
sortofageek
Site Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Team Helix
Contact:

Re: no credit for WU's complete

Post by sortofageek »

Hello void4ever and welcome to the site. :)

I checked the database and found your WU was credited.
Hi void4ever (team 64),
Your WU (P5768 R8 C216 G3580) was added to the stats database on 2012-06-01 16:02:33 for 353 points of credit.
Does this resolve the issue for you?
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: no credit for WU's complete

Post by Zagen30 »

Not all of the work servers, among them the one(s) containing pre-Fermi Nvidia work, have the necessary code to provide v7 with credit information, so the client defaults to displaying "unknown." The servers can't provide a credit estimate upon completion for the same reason. As sortofageek showed, you are being credited, it's just that the client itself doesn't have the information to tell you that.

Also, why did you remove the SMP slot? Your computer should be perfectly capable of running SMP and GPU concurrently.
Image
void4ever
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:00 pm

Re: no credit for WU's complete

Post by void4ever »

Ahhh that makes perfect sense, i didn't know that some servers didn't show credit. Thank you for enlightening me!

I took the SMP off because originally i popped in a 4850, but wasn't receiving WU's. After doing some research i realized why and swapped it for the G210. I've been an ATI/AMD folder all my life so I'm use to that client eating tons of CPU time. It was just recently that I realized the Nvidia core eats hardly anything at all, so I'll be firing the SMP back up in conjunction with the G210.

Are there any plans to upgrade these servers code to include credits? Either way thank you so much for your time!

Void4ever
DoctorsSon
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:04 pm

Re: no credit for WU's complete

Post by DoctorsSon »

Hmmm, I wonder if this is the same answer I will get about my GTX 260 not showing points on my client control.
I hadn't seen this thread before I started one about it.
Zagen30
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:45 am
Hardware configuration: Core i7 3770K @3.5 GHz (not folding), 8 GB DDR3 @2133 MHz, 2xGTX 780 @1215 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit running 7.3.6 w/ 1xSMP, 2xGPU

4P E5-4650 @3.1 GHz, 64 GB DDR3 @1333MHz, Ubuntu Desktop 13.10 64-bit

Re: no credit for WU's complete

Post by Zagen30 »

void4ever wrote:Are there any plans to upgrade these servers code to include credits?
Upgrading all the servers to the latest code is on their to-do list, but from my understanding even "minor" upgrades can be a major hassle. I'm guessing they don't want to go through all of that solely to fix what is really just a cosmetic issue. I have no idea when the next upgrade will occur, and I doubt anyone outside PG does, either.

@DoctorSon: It's the same issue.
Image
Post Reply