Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Moderator: Site Moderators
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:31 am
- Hardware configuration: @UK: Win7 Ultimate x64, Intel i5-2500K @ 4.2 GHz, Asus P8P67, 8 GB DDR3-1600, MSI R6870 Hawk, Crucial M4 128GB SSD, Samsung 1.5TB HDD.
@LUX: Win7 Professional x64, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600, Asus P5W DH Deluxe, 3 GB DDR2-800, Leadtek WinFast PX8800GT, over 9000 HDDs. - Location: Clervaux, LUX; Brighton, UK; Heidelberg, GER
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Heh, looking at my EOC stats, I'm at 101 WUs for Februrary so far. At this rate I might not be the last one after all
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=352741
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=352741
Steam profile | Perfection consists not in doing extraordinary things, but in doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. -Angelique Arnauld
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
803 so far this month.
-
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
- Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard - Location: Finland
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Count of Wus:
Honorary mentions go to MtM and Ravage7779 for taking the 3rd and 4th places, respectively, MtM with "a bunch of rather obsolete parts" to boot. That's the spirit, your valiant efforts are duly noted - 1st and 2nd places in the PPWU side betting for you, by a wide margin. Best of luck for the rest of the tournament.
- toTOW: 1780 (EOC)
- Grandpa_01: 1300 (EOC)
- MtM: 1082 (EOC)
- Ravage7779: 899 (EOC)
- Greywhiskers: 741 (EOC)
- bruce: 423 (EOC)
- Napoleon: 164 - 3 failed WUs == 161 (EOC)
- Hisuichan: 142 (EOC)
- Nathan_P: 125 (EOC #1 + EOC #2)
- MtM: 409
- Ravage7779: 505
- Napoleon: 871
- bruce: 1140
- Hisuichan: 1238
- Greywhiskers: 1884
- toTOW: 3946
- Grandpa_01: 19470
- Nathan_P: 45352
Honorary mentions go to MtM and Ravage7779 for taking the 3rd and 4th places, respectively, MtM with "a bunch of rather obsolete parts" to boot. That's the spirit, your valiant efforts are duly noted - 1st and 2nd places in the PPWU side betting for you, by a wide margin. Best of luck for the rest of the tournament.
Last edited by Napoleon on Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:43 am
- Hardware configuration: Quad Q9550 2.83 contains the GPU 57xx - running SMP and GPU
Quad Q6700 2.66 running just SMP
2P 32core Interlagos SMP on linux
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
looks like toTOW is the Super Count(ess) of Wus so far.
Now where's the "turbo" button on this pc!
Now where's the "turbo" button on this pc!
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot - Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Comparing PPWU I shouldn't say 'bunch of obsolete parts' as it's not even *that* bad compared to Ravage777
-
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
- Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard - Location: Finland
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Final standings for February tournament:
- toTOW: 2036 (EOC)
- Grandpa_01: 1443 (EOC)
- MtM: 1245 (EOC)
- Ravage7779: 1025 (EOC)
- Greywhiskers: 898 (EOC)
- bruce: 486 (EOC)
- Hisuichan: 186 (EOC)
- Napoleon: 183 - 3 failed WUs == 180 (EOC)
- Nathan_P: 141 (EOC #1 + EOC #2)
- MtM: 422
- Ravage7779: 520
- Napoleon: 891
- bruce: 1139
- Hisuichan: 1222
- Greywhiskers: 1793
- toTOW: 3752
- Grandpa_01: 21724
- Nathan_P: 47287
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot - Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Napoleon, you're deducting failed wu's but not deducting them from everyone? I have about 30 failed work unit's ( 92% success rate over past month or so ).
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
- Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
I know of 3 but they were not returned to the server they were GPU WU's but that does not mean there were not more, I have 2 many clients running and I can miss them. Congrats to Count toTOW I bow to the count.
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6349
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
I don't think I lost any WUs ...
Anyway, next month, I will not likely be able to compete at the same level ... so the challenge will be open
Anyway, next month, I will not likely be able to compete at the same level ... so the challenge will be open
-
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
- Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard - Location: Finland
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
MtM, I deducted 3 failed WUs from myself simply because I was aware of them. I have to rely on the contestants to inform me if the WU count in EOC (or Kakao) stats needs to be adjusted. Hence, rule 4 in the OP:
Now that toTOW has assured us that his success rate is 100% as far as he can tell, he's the undisputed champion. I will correct the final tally soon though, according to the info you all have provided, just to keep the records straight. I can only assume 100% success rate unless I'm notified otherwise, so my thanks to those who have taken the extra effort of keeping an eye on success rate.
I don't really know of any way to track down failed WUs for other participants. One of the reasons why I kept track of PPWU was to spot entirely unrealistic WU counts. Such as this, for example, viewtopic.php?f=20&t=20926&start=0 for more info. If I've missed some convenient way of keeping track, please let me know.Please be chivalrous. Edit your submission so that I may deduct any EUEd or otherwise failed WUs from your total WU count. I want to include succesfully completed and submitted WUs only
Now that toTOW has assured us that his success rate is 100% as far as he can tell, he's the undisputed champion. I will correct the final tally soon though, according to the info you all have provided, just to keep the records straight. I can only assume 100% success rate unless I'm notified otherwise, so my thanks to those who have taken the extra effort of keeping an eye on success rate.
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot - Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
- Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Which is a very good function I believe mine says I have a 99.57% success rate (SMP) with 463 WU's completed and 99.12% (GPU) with 228 WU's completed. I really like that feature MtM you can actually see how stable your rigs are. Thanks
Last edited by Grandpa_01 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:20 pm
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 - 8gb - p5q deluxe - gtx275 - hd4350 ( not folding ) win7 x64 - smp:4 - gpu slot
E6600 - 4gb - p5wdh deluxe - 9600gt - 9600gso - win7 x64 - smp:2 - 2 gpu slots
E2160 - 2gb - ?? - onboard gpu - win7 x32 - 2 uniprocessor slots
T5450 - 4gb - ?? - 8600M GT 512 ( DDR2 ) - win7 x64 - smp:2 - gpu slot - Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
Overall I'm at 1866wu's in the db, 55 failed which gives 97.08% sausages uhm success rate
I'm thinking of adding more features, like the ability to check failed work units against an online source for known issues ( like the nvidia's wu's, certain drivers and powersaving ). But I've got enough on my plate already ( though is a good feature and I'll add it when the time comes ). Most of my failed wu's are either configuration problems or restarts -> missing work files.
I'm thinking of adding more features, like the ability to check failed work units against an online source for known issues ( like the nvidia's wu's, certain drivers and powersaving ). But I've got enough on my plate already ( though is a good feature and I'll add it when the time comes ). Most of my failed wu's are either configuration problems or restarts -> missing work files.
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
In V7, Ticket #837 (accepted enhancement) is scheduled for Milestone: Public Release.MtM wrote:I'll have this functionality ready in the next public release of FAHWatch, people who want to participate could use it to check their eue count for any period.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
- Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M
Re: Count(ess) of Wus, February 2012
I owe you one They were good thoughMtM wrote:Overall I'm at 1866wu's in the db, 55 failed which gives 97.08% sausages uhm success rate
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding