Stanford Network Issue {Resolved}

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Leonardo
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:09 am
Hardware configuration: GPU slots on home-built, purpose-built PCs.
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Leonardo »

Why Norway? There's also plenty of chilled water up my way, Alaska, year-round.

Leonardo, official member of the Kuparuk, North Slope, Polar Bear Club :eo
new08
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:02 pm
Hardware configuration: Hewlett-Packard 1494 Win10 Build 1836
GeForce [MSI] GTX 950
Runs F@H Ver7.6.21
[As of Jan 2021]
Location: England

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by new08 »

Check page 1 this thread- you're too late already :)
[At least you are the same continent..]
Image
Leonardo
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:09 am
Hardware configuration: GPU slots on home-built, purpose-built PCs.
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Leonardo »

new08, your fair country has plenty of cold water as well!
Image
brainvision
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 6:38 pm
Hardware configuration: - HAL9008
-- INTEL Core i7-7700K @4200MHz
-- MSI nVidia GTX 1050 Ti
-- RAM 16GB DDR4 3200MHz (TeamGroup)

- HAL9009
-- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor, 3200 MHz
-- GIGABYTE GeForce GT 740 OC 2GB
-- RAM 8 GB DDR3 1333 MHz (2 GB x 4)
Location: Bologna (BO); Italy
Contact:

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by brainvision »

Hi.. I would like to ask you for a question.. these days we spent a lot of time talking about the outage of the Stanford's server and the wish that all works wouldn't have being lost.. So it has been normal, in last 3 days, to see this warning at the end of the uploading process of a project..

Code: Select all

		01:32:33:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
		01:32:33:Final credit estimate, 133.00 points
As we learn to know, almost of that points are going to be counted as usuaklly (I have to take allook, anyway).
But I noticed only 1 times another message: I can understand what it said, but I cannot understand the sense.. could somebody explain it, please? That's it

Code: Select all

			15:32:58:Unit 01: Upload complete
			15:32:58:Server responded GOT_ALREADY (434)
			15:32:58:WARNING: Server did not like results, dumping
			15:32:58:Cleaning up Unit 01
Thanks very much, as always! ;)
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Grandpa_01 »

The most likely explanation is that you previously ran the WU and it failed at some point and sent results back to Stanford. You were then reassigned the WU and completed it, when you sent it back the server rejected it from you because you had already sent the results. The other thing I have seen happen when this message appear is you may have sent the WU and it did not register with the F@H client on your machine so it sent it a second time. There are probably other reasons this could have happend but I have not seen them happen to me.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
brainvision
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 6:38 pm
Hardware configuration: - HAL9008
-- INTEL Core i7-7700K @4200MHz
-- MSI nVidia GTX 1050 Ti
-- RAM 16GB DDR4 3200MHz (TeamGroup)

- HAL9009
-- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor, 3200 MHz
-- GIGABYTE GeForce GT 740 OC 2GB
-- RAM 8 GB DDR3 1333 MHz (2 GB x 4)
Location: Bologna (BO); Italy
Contact:

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by brainvision »

Grandpa_01 wrote:The most likely explanation is that you previously ran the WU and it failed at some point and sent results back to Stanford. You were then reassigned the WU and completed it, when you sent it back the server rejected it from you because you had already sent the results. The other thing I have seen happen when this message appear is you may have sent the WU and it did not register with the F@H client on your machine so it sent it a second time. There are probably other reasons this could have happen but I have not seen them happen to me.
just to better help you to understand, in effect, this warning comes out when the client finished to upload the work, but it had to try so many times because in that moment my wireless was in troubles.. looking at the log it seems that a previous time it upload 100% of the file, but a moment later it says that the upload was failed and it started again.. maybe one of these time it really upload the work without knowing it (:D :D - sorry, I can't say better in english :( )
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Grandpa_01 »

That is the second explination I gave above and in that case you will recieve 100% credit for the WU. At least I did when it happend to me.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
Jesse_V
Site Moderator
Posts: 2850
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:44 am
Hardware configuration: OS: Windows 10, Kubuntu 19.04
CPU: i7-6700k
GPU: GTX 970, GTX 1080 TI
RAM: 24 GB DDR4
Location: Western Washington

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Jesse_V »

Leonardo wrote:Why Norway? There's also plenty of chilled water up my way, Alaska, year-round.

Leonardo, official member of the Kuparuk, North Slope, Polar Bear Club :eo
Haha! I understand Wasilla is knee-deep in snow, so that shouldn't be much of a problem. My parents are busy trying to clear their driveways and whatnot. Seriously, there's not much of a computer cooling issue in AK, especially right now. We have good Internet up there too; they should put some servers with the University of Alaska in Anchorage. We'll never have this problem again. :D
F@h is now the top computing platform on the planet and nothing unites people like a dedicated fight against a common enemy. This virus affects all of us. Lets end it together.
Napoleon
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:31 pm
Hardware configuration: Atom330 (overclocked):
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Intel Atom330 dualcore (4 HyperThreads)
NVidia GT430, core_15 work
2x2GB Kingston KVR1333D3N9K2/4G 1333MHz memory kit
Asus AT3IONT-I Deluxe motherboard
Location: Finland

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by Napoleon »

December 14th was a good day PPD wise, EOC reports 16 464 points. :lol:
Sounds right for my setup, as far as I can tell everything I folded during the network issue is accounted for. No more, no less.
Win7 64bit, FAH v7, OC'd
2C/4T Atom330 3x667MHz - GT430 2x832.5MHz - ION iGPU 3x466.7MHz
NaCl - Core_15 - display
VijayPande
Pande Group Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:25 am
Location: Stanford

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by VijayPande »

I'm glad to hear that this seems to be resolved for all (or at least most) people. Sorry for the delay in getting this done. Once nice aspect of FAH's points system is that it has a lot of internal redundancy, so points are always safe (stored in multiple locations with multiple possible failures handled), even if it takes some effort for us to get them back into the system.
Prof. Vijay Pande, PhD
Departments of Chemistry, Structural Biology, and Computer Science
Chair, Biophysics
Director, Folding@home Distributed Computing Project
Stanford University
brainvision
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 6:38 pm
Hardware configuration: - HAL9008
-- INTEL Core i7-7700K @4200MHz
-- MSI nVidia GTX 1050 Ti
-- RAM 16GB DDR4 3200MHz (TeamGroup)

- HAL9009
-- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor, 3200 MHz
-- GIGABYTE GeForce GT 740 OC 2GB
-- RAM 8 GB DDR3 1333 MHz (2 GB x 4)
Location: Bologna (BO); Italy
Contact:

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by brainvision »

But it seems to me that something is still to be repaired.. I'm actually still receiving warnings, it happens a few minutes ago..

Code: Select all

21:26:50:Unit 00: Upload complete
21:26:50:Server responded WORK_ACK (400)
another question: the client time is always set to +0 timezone, or so it seems.. it is in fact 2 hours before my timezone (a +1 for the timezone and another +1 for the daylight saving time; is there a way to set the clock to the system default timezone?

thanks
SomeStones
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by SomeStones »

Sorry, but, what warning?

My GPU always gets the same two lines you posted.

I assumed (look out) that WORK_ACK meant the server was saying "Work Acknowledged"
SomeStones
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:10 am

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by SomeStones »

As far as setting the time goes, I have never seen a way to set the time on any of the different clients and machines I run.

It seems to be set for GMT, UTC, ZULU, or whatever they call it this week.
emc_deux
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:42 pm

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by emc_deux »

Hi,

Sorry to say that but still about half my points and WU are missing.

Regards,
brainvision
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 6:38 pm
Hardware configuration: - HAL9008
-- INTEL Core i7-7700K @4200MHz
-- MSI nVidia GTX 1050 Ti
-- RAM 16GB DDR4 3200MHz (TeamGroup)

- HAL9009
-- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor, 3200 MHz
-- GIGABYTE GeForce GT 740 OC 2GB
-- RAM 8 GB DDR3 1333 MHz (2 GB x 4)
Location: Bologna (BO); Italy
Contact:

Re: Stanford Network Issue

Post by brainvision »

SomeStones wrote:As far as setting the time goes, I have never seen a way to set the time on any of the different clients and machines I run.

It seems to be set for GMT, UTC, ZULU, or whatever they call it this week.
SomeStones wrote:Sorry, but, what warning?

My GPU always gets the same two lines you posted.

I assumed (look out) that WORK_ACK meant the server was saying "Work Acknowledged"

thanks for both, man, I didn't know that.. :)
Post Reply