Donor Rank isn't accurate

[Pick2]

Personally , Close is good enough for Me , save the effort for the science.

[Grandpa_01]

I agree close is good enough. If you have the spare time fix them if not don't. I do not use the stats for donor rank I use the third party stats most of the time to save bandwidth on the stats server for others.

[P5-133XL]

Definitely do not remove the ranking. There will be too many people that will freak-out if they have no ranking. A wrong ranking is better than no ranking. With a wrong ranking only people that check ranking over time freak-out which is a small minority of the people that check it.

[derrickmcc]

Keep the ranking, it is much closer now after the recent change.

[kiore]

Keep the ranking, close enough is good enough as others have said. If it can be sorted out later to be more accurate, good, take your time.

[DocJonz]

Keep the ranking, close enough is good enough as others have said. If it can be sorted out later to be more accurate, good, take your time.

Ditto - keep the rankings.

I moved from donor rank 7 to 33 with the change .... but I can take it (EOC has me at 58)

[VijayPande]

ok, thanks. We're also looking to see what we should do to get them exactly the same. As I mentioned above, we have a plan, although it would be a change in how the stats system works. I plan to get that plan in motion on Monday.