benchmarking fah units

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
RETARD
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:17 pm

benchmarking fah units

Post by RETARD »

in the interest of hardware comparisons - is there a way the same unit(s) can be used to compare data across different types of hardware?
if not, perhaps someone could share a successful way to do so
TIA
p0wer
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:46 am
Hardware configuration: 1. HP ProLiant ML110 G5 - Xeon X3220, 4GB DDR2 800, Linux v7.4.4 CPU (6k ppd)
2. Desktop - Core i3 3420, 8GB DDR3 1600, GTX660, v7.4.4 GPU+NaCl (50k + 12k ppd)
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by p0wer »

I guess Stanford could gather such data, but given the amount of people folding this wuld be hell lot of information and they don't want to/don't have resources to share it. All we have is stats on folding web page (actually, only this)

There are some web sites around that tried to gather stats, it looks like not many people know about them though.
HendricksSA
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:34 am

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by HendricksSA »

Not sure which work units you are wanting to compare. There are lots of topics on the bigadv size work units. One good one was provided by Grandpa_01 at viewtopic.php?f=55&t=14757#p145568

In the past, what folks have done is pick a work unit they want to compare and then create a new topic (such as: viewtopic.php?f=55&t=17730 and ask for inputs.
Evil Penguin
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:34 am
Location: Texas, United States

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by Evil Penguin »

As far as nVidia vs ATi goes...
p11293 (ATi) and p6800 (nVidia) could possibly be compared.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6359
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by toTOW »

For my reviews on FAH-Addict, I backup a bunch of significant WUs : one of each type (number of atoms typically) that a client can run, and I run offline with a v6 client set to ignore deadline informations.
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
patonb
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:42 am
Hardware configuration: WooHoo= SR-2 -- L5639 @ ?? -- Evga 560ti FPB -- 12Gig Corsair XMS3 -- Corsair 1050hx -- Blackhawk Ultra

Foldie = @3.2Ghz -- Noctua NH-U12 -- BFG GTX 260-216 -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- x58a-ud3r -- 6Gig OCZ Gold -- hx520

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by patonb »

Theres a certain forum that a member made a test setup using a few units, that can be run.

Just don't try to upload the results as theyre way outa date.

I'd post it but last time I got bitched at for recuiting, yet I've never folded forum... Theyre just one of the top teams that are extremely hardware knowledable
WooHoo = L5639 @ 3.3Ghz Evga SR-2 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 CM 212+ Corsair 1050hx Blackhawk Ultra EVGA 560ti

Foldie = i7 950@ 4.0Ghz x58a-ud3r 216-216 @ 850/2000 3x2gb OCZ Gold NH-u12 Heatsink Corsair hx520 Antec 900
gwildperson
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:36 pm

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by gwildperson »

We used to contribute our information to http://fahinfo.org/ and it did an excellent job of comparing performance on different hardware when we were talking about the differences in CPU hardware. Now everybody wants to compare performance of GPUs and that really means [GPU with SMP] performance.

Some 3rd party needs to design a new database that allows for the additional complexity of multi-client/multi-slot configurations. We need somebody to volunteer, or the author of fahinfo needs to upgrade the design of his site. Finding things in a long list of forum posts can be a real drag.
k1wi
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: benchmarking fah units

Post by k1wi »

The biggest problem is that benchmarking is such a fraught issue. All it takes is for a user to be running an application in the background and you could end up with a benchmark that is passively undervalued.

k1wi
Image
Post Reply