Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
[Inpact]Terminou
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Location: Paris FRA

Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by [Inpact]Terminou »

Hello



It is not the first time i have this issue on 6702 project

Code: Select all

[14:44:46] 
[14:44:46] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[14:44:46] Entering M.D.
[14:44:53] Completed 0 out of 2000000 steps  (0%)
[14:55:57] Completed 20000 out of 2000000 steps  (1%)
[15:07:03] Completed 40000 out of 2000000 steps  (2%)
[15:18:06] Completed 60000 out of 2000000 steps  (3%)
[15:29:09] Completed 80000 out of 2000000 steps  (4%)
....

[02:23:58] Completed 1260000 out of 2000000 steps  (63%)
[02:34:59] Completed 1280000 out of 2000000 steps  (64%)
[02:46:01] Completed 1300000 out of 2000000 steps  (65%)
[02:57:06] Completed 1320000 out of 2000000 steps  (66%)
[03:08:10] Completed 1340000 out of 2000000 steps  (67%)
[03:11:11] Gromacs cannot continue further.
[03:11:11] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000
[03:11:11] Work fraction=0.6727 steps=2000000.
[03:11:15] logfile size=199300 infoLength=199300 edr=0 trr=23
[03:11:15] logfile size: 199300 info=199300 bed=0 hdr=23
[03:11:15] - Writing 199836 bytes of core data to disk...
[03:11:15]   ... Done.
[03:11:15] 
[03:11:15] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[03:11:19] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[03:11:19] Sending work to server
[03:11:19] Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)


[03:11:19] + Attempting to send results [July 28 03:11:19 UTC]
[03:11:19] - Reading file work/wuresults_07.dat from core
[03:11:19]   (Read 199836 bytes from disk)
[03:11:19] Connecting to http://171.64.65.56:8080/
[03:11:22] Posted data.
[03:11:22] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~65 kB/s
[03:11:22] - Averaged speed for that direction ~93 kB/s
[03:11:22] + Results successfully sent
[03:11:22] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.


That's very hard to get only 620 points after folding more than 12H :? :? :? :?
Last edited by [Inpact]Terminou on Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
EVGA SR2, 2* 5680,12 GO Corsair XMS3 Cas 9 2000MHz
MM Ext. Asc, Be Quiet 1200W P8
2 GWD GTX 260-896 GS 896 Mo (WC)
WD 600Go Sata III 10K, SSD Crucial C300 128Go (bigadv Kubuntu 10.10 + linux-ck + thekrakkhen)
All Watercooled
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by PantherX »

[Inpact]Terminou wrote:...It is not the first time i have this issue on 6702 project...
If this is something that you see on a regular basis, then I would start looking into hardware related items. If it is reported as bad, you may be unlucky to get so may bad WUs. If it is reported as good, then you should check your hardware.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
[Inpact]Terminou
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Location: Paris FRA

Re: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by [Inpact]Terminou »

Yes but if i'm credited like i mentioned. That's not an hardware issue isn't it ?
EVGA SR2, 2* 5680,12 GO Corsair XMS3 Cas 9 2000MHz
MM Ext. Asc, Be Quiet 1200W P8
2 GWD GTX 260-896 GS 896 Mo (WC)
WD 600Go Sata III 10K, SSD Crucial C300 128Go (bigadv Kubuntu 10.10 + linux-ck + thekrakkhen)
All Watercooled
PantherX
Site Moderator
Posts: 6986
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB

Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400
Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
Contact:

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by PantherX »

You may be given partial credits for EUEs however, if there are reports that the WU was able to finish successfully, then I would suggest that you check your hardware. Do remember that a small percentage of WUs from a Project may EUE, that is natural. For example, I have finished 199 SMP2 WUs without a single EUE. My GPU has finished ~900 WUs where it had only 3 EUEs that were caused by my fault; first was Windows Update and the second was my OC on my GPU which I had to reduce so that the new drivers would function properly. YMMV but there are very few WUs which are bad.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time

Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
B2K24
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by B2K24 »

The error relates to instabilities with RAM timings either being to tight or not enough voltage to QPI and or IOH settings.
susato
Site Moderator
Posts: 511
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:57 am
Location: Team MacOSX
Contact:

Re: Project: 6702 (Run 10, Clone 22, Gen 13)

Post by susato »

You're the second person to try this WU; the first donor didn't get any points. But his machine trashes 670x-class WU's regularly, so I wouldn't take his failure too seriously.
Post Reply