[Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:34 am
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Poll doesn't work...I can only cast one vote for multiple bigadv machines. For example I have two 2p units...
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:47 pm
- Hardware configuration: Rig: Asus Rampage III Extreme, i7 990X @ 4.6GHz, Kingston HyperX 6GB 2000MHz @ 7-7-7-20-1T, Gigabyte GTX580 1.5GB @ 1000/2000/4800
Sys: W7x64, GeForce 197.75, SMP2 6.29 fahcore_a2 v2.10 / fahcore_a3 v2.21, SMP2 6.30 fahcore_a3 v2.22, GPU2 6.23 fahcore_11 v1.31 / fahcore_14 v1.26, GPU3 6.30r1 fahcore_15 v2.09 - Location: Belgrade,Serbia
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Thanks Bruce for commenting. There is some interesting info from your (somewhat faulty) memory.bruce wrote:Judging from (a somewhat faulty) memory of things donors have said about their systems, FAH does have both private donors who spend a lot of money on their farms (whether that's exclusively for FAH or for other purposes isn't documented either). FAH also gets contributions from private donors who may own private business with lots of big-iron or from private donors who have permission from their employer to use the employer's hardware. Even if you were able to get good statistics, I'm not sure that the "private donors" distinction is a clear as it may seem to you.DonMarkoni wrote:And I think 2 and 4 socket systems contribution (from private donors) is small because of very high price.
This probably doesn't apply to you, but if you started with an assumed answer and a desire to prove that theory correct, you wouldn't be the first person who unintenonally shades the data. When you start excluding data, you have to either accept all data or at least have a clear distinction between what's going to be excluded and what is going to be included and why.
For years, medical studies were done by men and the test subjects were men. Now researchers are repeating some studies to see if by excluding women, the conclusions were biased.
About biasing, I wouldn't exclude any donor intentionally as it wouldn't be fair, as I said before, but obviously precise info is unavailable and someone searching and analyzing heap-loads of data would be too much distracted from doing science.
I know. I was thinking of a way to implement it better, but can't see one. Anyway, you can check farm and state your specs if you like.WitchDoctorB wrote:Poll doesn't work...I can only cast one vote for multiple bigadv machines. For example I have two 2p units...
Rig: Rampage IV Extreme, i7-3930K @ 5GHz, AData 4x2GB @ 2400MHz 9-11-9-27-1T, GTX680 Lightning @ 1200/6000
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Two more ways:DonMarkoni wrote:...I know. I was thinking of a way to implement it better, but can't see one. Anyway, you can check farm and state your specs if you like.WitchDoctorB wrote:Poll doesn't work...I can only cast one vote for multiple bigadv machines. For example I have two 2p units...
2) Other users can vote for the individual requiring that vote. (I assume that single users can choose multiple options and are willing to "share votes")
3) Make duplicate entries for that choice. (there are only 3 more options left)
For choice 1, the other vote should quote the original request so that it may not be accidentally selected more than the actual figure. With Choice 2, it will work with 2/3 entries but with multiple similar entries, Choice 1 can then be applied.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:47 pm
- Hardware configuration: Rig: Asus Rampage III Extreme, i7 990X @ 4.6GHz, Kingston HyperX 6GB 2000MHz @ 7-7-7-20-1T, Gigabyte GTX580 1.5GB @ 1000/2000/4800
Sys: W7x64, GeForce 197.75, SMP2 6.29 fahcore_a2 v2.10 / fahcore_a3 v2.21, SMP2 6.30 fahcore_a3 v2.22, GPU2 6.23 fahcore_11 v1.31 / fahcore_14 v1.26, GPU3 6.30r1 fahcore_15 v2.09 - Location: Belgrade,Serbia
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
PantherX wrote:Two more ways:DonMarkoni wrote:...I know. I was thinking of a way to implement it better, but can't see one. Anyway, you can check farm and state your specs if you like.WitchDoctorB wrote:Poll doesn't work...I can only cast one vote for multiple bigadv machines. For example I have two 2p units...
2) Other users can vote for the individual requiring that vote. (I assume that single users can choose multiple options and are willing to "share votes")
3) Make duplicate entries for that choice. (there are only 3 more options left)
For choice 1, the other vote should quote the original request so that it may not be accidentally selected more than the actual figure. With Choice 2, it will work with 2/3 entries but with multiple similar entries, Choice 1 can then be applied.
3rd option was my first idea, but with only 10 choices it was inapplicable. I think choosing farm is the best and I'll collect all farm entries and add 'em up and display numbers at OP.
Rig: Rampage IV Extreme, i7-3930K @ 5GHz, AData 4x2GB @ 2400MHz 9-11-9-27-1T, GTX680 Lightning @ 1200/6000
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
- Hardware configuration: 4p/4 MC ES @ 3.0GHz/32GB
4p/4x6128 @ 2.47GHz/32GB
2p/2 IL ES @ 2.7GHz/16GB
1p/8150/8GB
1p/1090T/4GB - Location: neither here nor there
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
The way you have the poll set up now it looks more as an AMD vs. Intel instead of 1p vs. 2,4,8p as the above quote reads.DonMarkoni wrote:I was interested in significance of single socket machines for -bigadv folding and it's share in % ?
If I may be allowed to make a suggestion I would have broke it down like this:
1p
2p
2x2p
3x2p
4p
2x4p
3x4p
8p
2x8p
Farm
For Farm and more than 2x8p they could post their numbers as you said. With the 1p selection it would cover Intel's i7 and AMD's Magny Cours.
Now you would have a hardware natural poll.
iustus quia...
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
In addition to orion's suggestion, you could give a brief description like:
1p (Intel i7 & AMD)
2p (Intel & AMD)
2x2p (Intel & AMD)
3x2p (Intel & AMD)
4p (Intel & AMD)
2x4p (Intel & AMD)
3x4p (Intel & AMD)
8p (Intel & AMD)
2x8p (Intel & AMD)
Farm (Intel & AMD)
If that is too much text, then in the original post, you may want to clarify that: (makes it easier to the new user to judge)
1p = 1 socket motherboard with Intel Core i7 CPUs or AMD CPUs
2p = 2 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x2p = 4 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
3x2p = 6 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
4p = 4 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x4p = 8 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
3x4p = 12 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
8p = 8 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x8p = 16 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
Farm = Your specifications of the Folding Farm
Note: I am sure that I messed up the 2X8p and others in the description as I am not aware of them so do correct them.
1p (Intel i7 & AMD)
2p (Intel & AMD)
2x2p (Intel & AMD)
3x2p (Intel & AMD)
4p (Intel & AMD)
2x4p (Intel & AMD)
3x4p (Intel & AMD)
8p (Intel & AMD)
2x8p (Intel & AMD)
Farm (Intel & AMD)
If that is too much text, then in the original post, you may want to clarify that: (makes it easier to the new user to judge)
1p = 1 socket motherboard with Intel Core i7 CPUs or AMD CPUs
2p = 2 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x2p = 4 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
3x2p = 6 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
4p = 4 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x4p = 8 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
3x4p = 12 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
8p = 8 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
2x8p = 16 Sockets motherboard with any Intel/AMD CPUs
Farm = Your specifications of the Folding Farm
Note: I am sure that I messed up the 2X8p and others in the description as I am not aware of them so do correct them.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:45 pm
- Hardware configuration: 4p/4 MC ES @ 3.0GHz/32GB
4p/4x6128 @ 2.47GHz/32GB
2p/2 IL ES @ 2.7GHz/16GB
1p/8150/8GB
1p/1090T/4GB - Location: neither here nor there
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
We really don't need to add AMD or Intel since those are the only two CPU manufactures that make cpu's that can run -bigadv.
People who vote will now that.
People who vote will now that.
iustus quia...
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6986
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:33 am
- Hardware configuration: V7.6.21 -> Multi-purpose 24/7
Windows 10 64-bit
CPU:2/3/4/6 -> Intel i7-6700K
GPU:1 -> Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
§
Retired:
2x Nvidia GTX 1070
Nvidia GTX 675M
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GTX 650 SC
Nvidia GTX 260 896 MB SOC
Nvidia 9600GT 1 GB OC
Nvidia 9500M GS
Nvidia 8800GTS 320 MB
Intel Core i7-860
Intel Core i7-3840QM
Intel i3-3240
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Pentium E5500
Intel Pentium E5400 - Location: Land Of The Long White Cloud
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Great, now I look like an idiot Well, I guess that's what happen when your awake for ~20 hours.orion wrote:We really don't need to add AMD or Intel since those are the only two CPU manufactures that make cpu's that can run -bigadv.
People who vote will now that.
ETA:
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
Now ↞ Very Soon ↔ Soon ↔ Soon-ish ↔ Not Soon ↠ End Of Time
Welcome To The F@H Support Forum Ӂ Troubleshooting Bad WUs Ӂ Troubleshooting Server Connectivity Issues
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
- Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
I choose I7 system and farm What I run is 3-I7's
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:52 pm
- Hardware configuration: .
- Location: Tidewater, Oregon
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
I also choose i7 and Farm, I have 17 i7's running 24/7Grandpa_01 wrote:I choose I7 system and farm What I run is 3-I7's
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:47 pm
- Hardware configuration: Rig: Asus Rampage III Extreme, i7 990X @ 4.6GHz, Kingston HyperX 6GB 2000MHz @ 7-7-7-20-1T, Gigabyte GTX580 1.5GB @ 1000/2000/4800
Sys: W7x64, GeForce 197.75, SMP2 6.29 fahcore_a2 v2.10 / fahcore_a3 v2.21, SMP2 6.30 fahcore_a3 v2.22, GPU2 6.23 fahcore_11 v1.31 / fahcore_14 v1.26, GPU3 6.30r1 fahcore_15 v2.09 - Location: Belgrade,Serbia
- Contact:
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
I appreciate the suggestions and I would change, but what will happen to already submitted votes? How do I keep them connected to right choices?
Rig: Rampage IV Extreme, i7-3930K @ 5GHz, AData 4x2GB @ 2400MHz 9-11-9-27-1T, GTX680 Lightning @ 1200/6000
Re: [Poll] 4 cores / 8 threads significance in -bigadv folding
Don't think you can, so best to stick with what you have and factor in the 'issues', or ask everyone to vote again..DonMarkoni wrote:I appreciate the suggestions and I would change, but what will happen to already submitted votes? How do I keep them connected to right choices?
Oh and just 1 i7920 for me at present, although another one soonish.
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .
Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616