I received a P6013 R0 C95 G85 also, and it displays the same slow behavior as shown in the log.
Code: Select all
[06:12:55] + Number of Units Completed: 184
[06:12:56] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:12:56] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:12:56] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[06:12:56] Cleaning up work directory
[06:12:56] + Attempting to get work packet
[06:12:56] Passkey found
[06:12:56] - Will indicate memory of 1956 MB
[06:12:56] - Connecting to assignment server
[06:12:56] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[06:12:57] Posted data.
[06:12:57] Initial: ED82; - Successful: assigned to (130.237.232.140).
[06:12:57] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[06:12:57] Loaded queue successfully.
[06:12:57] Connecting to http://130.237.232.140:8080/
[06:13:01] Posted data.
[06:13:01] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 979931)
[06:13:04] - Downloaded at ~318 kB/s
[06:13:04] - Averaged speed for that direction ~636 kB/s
[06:13:04] + Received work.
[06:13:04] Trying to send all finished work units
[06:13:04] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[06:13:04] + Closed connections
[06:13:04]
[06:13:04] + Processing work unit
[06:13:04] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[06:13:04] Core found.
[06:13:04] Working on queue slot 00 [June 20 06:13:04 UTC]
[06:13:04] + Working ...
[06:13:04] - Calling './FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 00 -np 4 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 2430 -version 629'
[06:13:04]
[06:13:04] *------------------------------*
[06:13:04] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[06:13:04] Version 2.22 (June 10, 2010)
[06:13:04]
[06:13:04] Preparing to commence simulation
[06:13:04] - Looking at optimizations...
[06:13:04] - Created dyn
[06:13:04] - Files status OK
[06:13:05] - Expanded 979419 -> 10427873 (decompressed 1064.6 percent)
[06:13:05] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=979419 data_size=10427873, decompressed_data_size=10427873 diff=0
[06:13:05] - Digital signature verified
[06:13:05]
[06:13:05] Project: 6013 (Run 0, Clone 95, Gen 85)
[06:13:05]
[06:13:05] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[06:13:05] Entering M.D.
Starting 4 threads
NNODES=4, MYRANK=2, HOSTNAME=thread #2
NNODES=4, MYRANK=3, HOSTNAME=thread #3
NNODES=4, MYRANK=1, HOSTNAME=thread #1
NNODES=4, MYRANK=0, HOSTNAME=thread #0
Reading file work/wudata_00.tpr, VERSION 4.0.99_development_20090605 (single precision)
Note: tpx file_version 68, software version 70
Making 1D domain decomposition 1 x 1 x 4
starting mdrun 'IBX in water'
21500002 steps, 43000.0 ps (continuing from step 21250002, 42500.0 ps).
[06:13:23] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
[07:04:27] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
[07:55:30] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
[08:46:34] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
[09:37:37] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
[10:28:41] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)
[11:19:44] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6%)
[11:54:23] - Autosending finished units... [June 20 11:54:23 UTC]
[11:54:23] Trying to send all finished work units
[11:54:23] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[11:54:23] - Autosend completed
[12:10:48] Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps (7%)
51:03 tpf is
not normal for that machine as QD shows.....
Code: Select all
Index 7: finished 921.00 pts (47.591 pt/hr, 1141.83 ppd) 7.44 X min speed
bonus pts: 5086.26 (262.743 pt/hr, 6305.83 ppd); bonus factor: 5.52; kfactor: 4.10
server: 171.64.65.56:8080; project: 6701
Folding: run 68, clone 26, generation 3; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 200, 12 (le)
issue: Fri Jun 18 10:26:41 2010; begin: Fri Jun 18 10:27:02 2010
end: Sat Jun 19 05:48:11 2010; due: Thu Jun 24 10:27:02 2010 (6 days)
preferred: Mon Jun 21 15:15:02 2010 (3 days)
user: 58Enfield; team: 131; ID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; mach ID: 1
(switched to new version Fahcore_a3.exe)
Index 8: finished 470.00 pts (49.703 pt/hr, 1191.93 ppd) 15.2 X min speed
bonus pts: 2592.78 (273.974 pt/hr, 6575.37 ppd); bonus factor: 5.52; kfactor: 2.00
server: 130.237.232.140:8080; project: 6012
Folding: run 1, clone 302, generation 75; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 600, 12 (le)
issue: Sat Jun 19 05:55:50 2010; begin: Sat Jun 19 05:56:17 2010
end: Sat Jun 19 15:23:39 2010; due: Fri Jun 25 05:56:17 2010 (6 days)
preferred: Tue Jun 22 05:56:17 2010 (3 days)
user: 58Enfield; team: 131; ID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; mach ID: 1
Index 9: finished 380.00 pts (49.520 pt/hr, 1187.03 ppd) 9.38 X min speed
bonus pts: 2132.32 (277.535 pt/hr, 6660.85 ppd); bonus factor: 5.61; kfactor: 3.36
server: 130.237.232.140:8080; project: 6013
Folding: run 0, clone 84, generation 184; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 600, 12 (le)
issue: Sat Jun 19 15:27:06 2010; begin: Sat Jun 19 15:27:40 2010
end: Sat Jun 19 23:08:05 2010; due: Tue Jun 22 15:27:40 2010 (3 days)
preferred: Tue Jun 22 15:27:40 2010 (3 days)
user: 58Enfield; team: 131; ID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; mach ID: 1
Index 0: folding now 380.00 pts (4.461 pt/hr, 107.06 ppd) 0.845 X min speed; 7% complete
server: 130.237.232.140:8080; project: 6013
Folding: run 0, clone 95, generation 85; benchmark 0; misc: 500, 600, 12 (le)
issue: Sat Jun 19 23:12:31 2010; begin: Sat Jun 19 23:13:04 2010
expect: Wed Jun 23 12:23:32 2010; due: Tue Jun 22 23:13:04 2010 (3 days)
preferred: Tue Jun 22 23:13:04 2010 (3 days)
user: 58Enfield; team: 131; ID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; mach ID: 1
Average download rate 652.035 KB/s (u=4); upload rate 85.111 KB/s (u=4)
Performance fraction 0.904590 (u=4)
Average pph: 45.692, ppd: 1096.60, ppw: 7676.2, ppy: 400523
Average bonus pph: 261.897, ppd: 6285.53, ppw: 43998.7, ppy: 2295726
Average alternate pph: 30.159, ppd: 723.82, ppw: 5066.7, ppy: 264367
Average alternate bonus pph: 261.897, ppd: 6285.53, ppw: 43998.7, ppy: 2295726
Given the information on the other 6013 thread about getting the same defective work unit back over and over, I have already renamed the folding directory and setup a new folder on that machine.
The only wrinkles are that I did upgrade to the new core version three work units back, and all work units have been running faster except this one (other machines included). This machine was getting marginal on heat under the old core (59-61C @ 30C ambient)...and went to 63-64C under the new core. No complaints...it is also working harder as the QD log shows. It is going to be offline today while I re-validate it at a lower overclock (and hopefully lower heat).
Old specs: 3.4 gh Q6600 dedicated Kubuntu 8.04.4 2.6.24-28 generic