Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
amuro.ID
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:00 am

Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by amuro.ID »

Here's the log

[15:22:32] Completed 175000 out of 2500000 steps (7%)
[15:27:04] Quit 101 - Fatal error:
[15:27:04] Step 186025, time 65372.1 (ps) LINCS WARNING
[15:27:04] relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
[15:27:04] max 0.001895 (between atoms 148 and 151) rms 0.000183
[15:27:04]
[15:27:04] Simulation instability has been encountered. The run has entered a
[15:27:04] state from which no further progress can be made.
[15:27:04] This may be the correct result of the simulation, however if you
[15:27:04] often see other project units terminating early like this
[15:27:04] too, you may wish to check the stability of your computer (issues
[15:27:04] such as high temperature, overclocking, etc.).
[15:27:04] Going to send back what have done.
[15:27:04] logfile size: 14497
[15:27:04] - Writing 15179 bytes of core data to disk...
[15:27:04] Done: 14667 -> 3882 (compressed to 26.4 percent)
[15:27:04] ... Done.
[15:27:04]
[15:27:04] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[15:27:04] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[15:27:04] Sending work to server
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by toTOW »

Someone else completed this WU without issue ...
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
amuro.ID
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:00 am

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by amuro.ID »

Any idea why it goes like that ?

My CPU is not overclocked. And this is the 2nd time i encountered this error.
The other one was this : viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14164

If someone already completed it, why it got assigned again ? I got that WU about one day ago.

Thanks for your help.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by toTOW »

It might be a good idea to check your machine for stability (and to clean dust from it if you didn't do so for a long time) (I mean both CPU and RAM stability).
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by bruce »

I don't see where the WU was assigned again. Project: 6326 (Run 0, Clone 82, Gen 13) and Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) are different WUs.
wan.ardiles
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:06 am

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by wan.ardiles »

[OUT OF TOPIC]

Does every EUE need to be reported here? My 2nd machine got EUE two days ago.
bruce
Posts: 20824
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: So. Cal.

Re: Project: 6326 (Run 9, Clone 40, Gen 13) EARLY_UNIT_END

Post by bruce »

Most EUEs are reported automatically. Reporting them here may help others with a similar problem and it helps if we find a bad WU that needs to be stopped manually, but that's supposed to happen automatically, too, so a report here is not necessary, but it's generally a useful thing to do.

After an EUE, one of two things happen: The client frequently uploads a report and you get partial credit. Less frequently, the result is so badly corrupted that nothing is uploaded and the WU is deleted. Reporting the "wu deleted" cases is more important than reporting the uploaded cases.
Post Reply