171.64.65.54 - Missing WU

[Sticky]

Could someone please verify this.

Code: Select all

[02:23:25] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[02:23:27] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[02:23:27] Unit 9 finished with 93 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[02:23:27] Updated performance fraction: 0.933691
[02:23:27] Sending work to server
[02:23:27] Project: 6025 (Run 1, Clone 103, Gen 41)


[02:23:27] + Attempting to send results [March 17 02:23:27 UTC]
[02:23:27] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[02:23:27]   (Read 20353824 bytes from disk)
[02:23:27] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[02:23:58] Posted data.
[02:23:58] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~641 kB/s
[02:23:58] - Averaged speed for that direction ~502 kB/s
[02:23:58] + Results successfully sent
[02:23:58] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[02:23:58] + Number of Units Completed: 82

[toTOW]

Hi Sticky (team 11314),
Your WU (P6025 R1 C103 G41) was added to the stats database on 2010-03-16 19:04:37 for 2670.02 points of credit.

[Sticky]

Weird. How about these. It seems one A3 unit is missing, according to the EOC stats. They all followed the previous unit starting from About 3 A.M. EST(Actually EDT now) yesterday(3-17-2010).



6020 (Run 0, Clone 131, Gen 75)
Project: 6023 (Run 1, Clone 52, Gen 54)
Project: 6012 (Run 2, Clone 67, Gen 15)

Thanks!

Edit:
Something i just noticed. If the time you mentioned above is UTC. That doesn't match up with my log. The WU just before the one in my OP was also a P6025 "6025 (Run 1, Clone 108[\b], Gen 34)", But the Clone and Gen is different. The time matches up with the Clone 108 unit, not with the 103 unit.

Code: Select all

[16:29:05] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[16:29:08] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[16:29:08] Unit 8 finished with 93 percent of time to deadline remaining.
[16:29:08] Updated performance fraction: 0.934273
[16:29:08] Sending work to server
[16:29:08] Project: 6025 (Run 1, Clone 108, Gen 34)


[16:29:08] + Attempting to send results [March 16 16:29:08 UTC]
[16:29:08] - Reading file work/wuresults_08.dat from core
[16:29:08]   (Read 20353770 bytes from disk)
[16:29:08] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[16:30:14] Posted data.
[16:30:15] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~296 kB/s
[16:30:15] - Averaged speed for that direction ~468 kB/s
[16:30:15] + Results successfully sent
[16:30:15] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[16:30:15] + Number of Units Completed: 81

[16:30:19] Trying to send all finished work units

[toTOW]

The time from the DB is PST if I'm not mistaken ... time in the log is UTC.

Hi Sticky (team 11314),
Your WU (P6020 R0 C131 G75) was added to the stats database on 2010-03-17 05:04:34 for 467 points of credit.

Hi Sticky (team 11314),
Your WU (P6023 R1 C52 G54) was added to the stats database on 2010-03-17 15:04:45 for 2612.98 points of credit.

Hi Sticky (team 11314),
Your WU (P6012 R2 C67 G15) was added to the stats database on 2010-03-18 00:04:44 for 2554.92 points of credit.

[Sticky]

The time from the DB is PST if I'm not mistaken ... time in the log is UTC.

Hi Sticky (team 11314),
Your WU (P6020 R0 C131 G75) was added to the stats database on 2010-03-17 05:04:34 for 467 points of credit.

Weird. Looks like that's where the points went. I didn't think that was the A3 unit in the stats as the points where so low and it showed it as 2 WU's. Guess their is no idea why i wasn't credited the bonus.

[ChelseaOilman]

It seems one A3 unit is missing, according to the EOC stats.

I have a feeling the issue isn't that the WU is missing, the issue is that you didn't get bonus points for it because there was an issue with the bonus points system the other night.

See Kasson's post ---> http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?p=135945#p135945

[Sticky]

It seems one A3 unit is missing, according to the EOC stats.

I have a feeling the issue isn't that the WU is missing, the issue is that you didn't get bonus points for it because there was an issue with the bonus points system the other night.

See Kasson's post ---> http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?p=135945#p135945

Yep, that seems to be it. Thanks for the link.