As it says... p10101 is no longer on the psummary page. I'm am still receiving these WUs on my GPU2 clients, so they must still be active.
I have reports from HFM users who have installed a new instance of HFM and cannot get a reading for this Project. I now see why, it's not on the psummary.
p10101 not on psummary
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:20 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Contact:
Re: p10101 not on psummary
You should cache the projects listed on the psummary pages locally, so they're always available in your application.
Your application cache can be synced with the Jmol fah-projects, FCI project-summary and fahinfo.org export data
Your application cache can be synced with the Jmol fah-projects, FCI project-summary and fahinfo.org export data
Re: p10101 not on psummary
I do. But I don't currently deploy the application with a pre-built "cache file" - due to these recent issues I've been considering it.
It's not automated (yet) but I occasionally upload a new ProjectInfo.tab file here (just updated it): http://hfm-net.googlecode.com/svn/trunk ... ctInfo.tab
Jmol looks pretty complete, but the core id strings seem to be truncated to a "code" tag == more conversion for me. The fahinfo.org data doesn't list these p101xx projects either - and it's just in a totally different format. I like how your FCI data looks, but it looks like the kfactor data is incomplete. I agree, it would be nice if we all had a consistent data source.
I'll have to think about this some more. I may just stop pulling directly from the psummary and just auto update my file and pull from there. We'll see.
Caching data or not... the bottom line is - why aren't Projects currently in circulation listed on the psummary pages???
It's not automated (yet) but I occasionally upload a new ProjectInfo.tab file here (just updated it): http://hfm-net.googlecode.com/svn/trunk ... ctInfo.tab
Jmol looks pretty complete, but the core id strings seem to be truncated to a "code" tag == more conversion for me. The fahinfo.org data doesn't list these p101xx projects either - and it's just in a totally different format. I like how your FCI data looks, but it looks like the kfactor data is incomplete. I agree, it would be nice if we all had a consistent data source.

I'll have to think about this some more. I may just stop pulling directly from the psummary and just auto update my file and pull from there. We'll see.
Caching data or not... the bottom line is - why aren't Projects currently in circulation listed on the psummary pages???
Re: p10101 not on psummary
I can think of several possibilities. (I don't have access to any of the actual code, so these are just speculation from the external symptoms.)harlam357 wrote:... the bottom line is - why aren't Projects currently in circulation listed on the psummary pages???
1) I suspect that the Psummary script polls the servers periodically but does not cache data. This means that if a server is off-line at the moment it is polled, the data probably disappears until the next time a poll finds that project back on-line. Meanwhile the server, itself, can come back on-line and distribute work.
2) A new version of the psummary scxript has been deployed. It may have a bug.
3) New server code is being deployed. This might have caused unforeseen issues in the polling process . . . especially since the psummary script has to work simultaneously with servers that have either the old or the new server code.
4) The integration of the various servers into a single system is really very complex and it runs 24x7x52. Making changes to a real-time system is fraught with pitfalls and there's really no way to test that integration in a laboratory environment.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.