Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by anko1 »

I presume this is a case of my machine funking out, but just in case....

Code: Select all

[03:41:54] + Processing work unit
[03:41:54] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[03:41:54] Core found.
[03:41:54] Working on queue slot 03 [January 5 03:41:54 UTC]
[03:41:54] + Working ...
[03:41:54] - Calling '.\FahCore_11.exe -dir work/ -suffix 03 -priority 96 -nocpulock -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 5104 -version 620'

[03:41:55] 
[03:41:55] *------------------------------*
[03:41:55] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[03:41:55] Version 1.19 (Mon Nov 3 09:34:13 PST 2008)
[03:41:55] 
[03:41:55] Compiler  : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 
[03:41:55] Build host: amoeba
[03:41:55] Board Type: Nvidia
[03:41:55] Core      : 
[03:41:55] Preparing to commence simulation
[03:41:55] - Looking at optimizations...
[03:41:55] - Created dyn
[03:41:55] - Files status OK
[03:41:55] - Expanded 46674 -> 252912 (decompressed 541.8 percent)
[03:41:55] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=46674 data_size=252912, decompressed_data_size=252912 diff=0
[03:41:55] - Digital signature verified
[03:41:55] 
[03:41:55] Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)
[03:41:55] 
[03:41:55] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[03:41:55] Entering M.D.
[03:42:07] Working on Protein
[03:42:11] Client config found, loading data.
[03:42:11] Starting GUI Server
[03:49:57] Completed 1%

                      {snip}

[11:54:54] Completed 72%
[12:02:32] Completed 73%
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005D0E48, varsize=21120
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01093018, varsize=7524
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01094E20, varsize=7524
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01091210, varsize=7524
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01061A28, varsize=7524
[12:02:32] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=0105FCB8, varsize=7524
[12:09:35] Completed 74%
[12:09:35] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[12:09:35] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005D0E48, varsize=21120
[12:09:35] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01093018, varsize=7524
[12:09:35] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01094E20, varsize=7524
[12:17:15] Completed 75%
[12:24:54] Completed 76%
[12:24:54] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[12:24:54] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005D0E48, varsize=21120
[12:32:33] Completed 77%
                         {snip- if listing all the various permutations of the above and below would be helpful, let me know}
[14:23:34] Completed 93%
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005D0E48, varsize=21120
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01093018, varsize=7524
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01094E20, varsize=7524
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01091210, varsize=7524
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01061A28, varsize=7524
[14:23:34] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=0105FCB8, varsize=7524
[14:30:22] Completed 94%
[14:37:39] Completed 95%
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005D0E48, varsize=21120
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01093018, varsize=7524
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01094E20, varsize=7524
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01091210, varsize=7524
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=01061A28, varsize=7524
[14:37:40] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=0105FCB8, varsize=7524
[14:44:58] Completed 96%
[14:44:58] fcSaveRestoreState: I/O failed dir=1, var=005C3F40, varsize=53000
[14:52:15] Completed 97%
[14:59:31] Completed 98%
[15:06:50] Completed 99%
[15:14:10] Completed 100%
[15:14:10] mdrun_gpu returned 
[15:14:10] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=15000000
[15:14:10] Work fraction=1.0000 steps=15000000.
[15:14:14] logfile size=29370 infoLength=29370 edr=0 trr=25
[15:14:14] - Could not open results file
[15:14:14] 
[15:14:14] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[15:14:17] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[15:14:17] Sending work to server
[15:14:17] Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)
[15:14:17] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[15:14:17] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_03.dat
[15:14:17] - Error: Could not read unit 03 file. Removing from queue.
Tobit
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: Manchester, NH USA

Re: Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by Tobit »

Looks like you have a drive problem to me. :(
anko1
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:31 am
Hardware configuration: Old Faithful CPU: Windows Graphical 5.03; Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540
(3.2GHz) HT;Windows XP
Big Red: Windows SMP Console 6.29; Windows GPU console 6.20r1; Intel Q9450 2.66G; ASUS P5Q 775 P45; [BFG 9800GTX+ old graphics card] NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX [as of 5/9/09]; Windows XP Pro SP3
Lenovo Think Pad: Windows 6.29 w/ SMP; Windows GPU Console 6.20r1 systray; Intel QX9300; NVIDIA Quadro FX-3700M; Windows XP Professional
Location: SF Peninsula

Re: Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by anko1 »

Could have been a temporary thing. My laptop screen was frozen when I checked this morning. After restarting, I got the same WU and breezed through it w/o a problem.
statesidecoma
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:51 am
Location: Grove, Oklahoma

Re: Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by statesidecoma »

How come 5765-5768 has been released again. These projects used to cause alot of people Nan detected errors. Especially with 295 GTX's. My GPU's haven't had any folding problems at all for a long time. Now they are out again, so back to the constant EUE's and cards just sitting idle for hours at a time. Which doesn't further any research donations or help you guys out. I have tried every CUDA driver possible. those projects just are horrible for any Nvidia cards. None of my cards are overclocked either. and they pass Memtest with flying colors.
Tobit
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: Manchester, NH USA

Re: Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by Tobit »

statesidecoma wrote:How come 5765-5768 has been released again.
No problems here, I have done at least a 100 of these with no issues. Maybe if you supply some more information we might be able to help you better.

Code: Select all

 Project ID: 5765
 Core: GROGPU2
 Credit: 353
 Frames: 100

 Name: ganymede - GTX 260
 Path: \\ganymede\fah\gpu0
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:41 - 7,438.8 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:42 - 7,261.7 PPD

 Name: io - 8800GT
 Path: C:\fah\gpu0\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:52 - 5,865.2 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:53 - 5,754.6 PPD

 Name: io - 9600GSO
 Path: C:\fah\gpu1\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:08 - 4,485.2 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:09 - 4,420.2 PPD
statesidecoma
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:51 am
Location: Grove, Oklahoma

Re: Project: 5765 (Run 1, Clone 12, Gen 1560)

Post by statesidecoma »

Went ahead and switched over to the console clients instead of systrays. So far so good, no retruns or NAN's detected. I know not everybody has problems with these projects, but when they first came out alot of people had issues with them. And I haven't had NAN errors in over 6 months. 5765-5768 is extra sensitive for some reason. But all good for now :mrgreen:
Post Reply