Huhm I treid, sorry if I faileddjchandler wrote:Do we need an impartial arbitrator? There's no one posting here that's impartial, that's for certain.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
Huhm I treid, sorry if I faileddjchandler wrote:Do we need an impartial arbitrator? There's no one posting here that's impartial, that's for certain.
MtM wrote:Huhm I treid, sorry if I faileddjchandler wrote:Do we need an impartial arbitrator? There's no one posting here that's impartial, that's for certain.
thanksGrandpa_01 wrote:MtM wrote:Huhm I treid, sorry if I faileddjchandler wrote:Do we need an impartial arbitrator? There's no one posting here that's impartial, that's for certain.
I thought you were impartial.
MtM wrote:
Btw, something just dawned on me ( abit late I should add ). If you don't have the logs, where did you get the data from to create the summary you posted?
I think you should change the title of this thread. Obviously your "pretty please" wasn't a true statement of your feelings and now we know how you really feel.Grandpa_01 wrote:Well now I know what has happend to our society. DAMM SCUMBAGS
Just curious but I have used the words (Ass,Damm, & Hell) 2 of which are in the Bible so it must be the word Ass you find offincive.codysluder wrote:I think you should change the title of this thread. Obviously your "pretty please" wasn't a true statement of your feelings and now we know how you really feel.Grandpa_01 wrote:Well now I know what has happend to our society. DAMM SCUMBAGS
Note to Moderators: When are you going to close this thread? This is a family-rated forum and I don't want my kids/grandkids reading Grantpa's language.
I do not know that that was the best question to ask a business man. I do not have any servers so this will have to be a hypotheticalmdk777 wrote:How about this simple question:
There are 307,519 folders today.
If the point credit review were re-opened, how many of those would you be willing to be responsible for fact checking, email responding, and manually re-crediting?
This is the core of the current problem. I am sorry some people have lost points due to mistakes on our side. We are working on solutions. I am currently developing a new client. One feature it will support is that the client will keep records of all the units it has completed, indefinitely. There are more details to how the new system will help to guarantee you get your points but I cannot say more than this ATM because the actual implementation is still under discussion.mdk777 wrote:There are 307,519 folders today. If the point credit review were re-opened, how many of those would you be willing to be responsible for fact checking, email responding, and manually re-crediting? :?:
Thanks for the info that should take care of the problem in the future. HFM does that when it is running it can download all of the info of each completed unit to an excel file.jcoffland wrote:This is the core of the current problem. I am sorry some people have lost points due to mistakes on our side. We are working on solutions. I am currently developing a new client. One feature it will support is that the client will keep records of all the units it has completed, indefinitely.mdk777 wrote:There are 307,519 folders today. If the point credit review were re-opened, how many of those would you be willing to be responsible for fact checking, email responding, and manually re-crediting?
(I just wonder) That upcoming client will provide any way (except restart) to rotate logs? ((more verbosely) Both the client and the core keep 'FAHlog.txt' open; I believe that 'SIGHUP' will kill them but force reopen; thus restart is the only way; I believe that restart is somewhat dirty for supposed to be instantly running code.) Any comments?jcoffland wrote:One feature it will support is that the client will keep records of all the units it has completed, indefinitely.