171.64.65.56 not responding

bollix47 · Post by **bollix47** » Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:19 am

From Vijay's Nov 3rd tweet:

.... New servers arrived yesterday. Hope to have them installed, etc soon.

theo343 · Post by **theo343** » Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:59 pm

7im wrote:If you send money to Stanford in a donationa, please be sure to follow the directions on the fah project home page. That way the money goes straight to Pande Group, and not to the Stanford general fund. I doubt very much that Pande Group has much in the way of overhead. Vijay doesn't do this for the cars, yachts, etc.

@ theo343, the results from the project are published openly, publicly. It would be very difficult for the results to be "only ... used by large companies" Small companies, universities, and public health organizations could all use the information alike.

And no offense, but IMO the big break throughs coming in the cancer field will be in early detection and prevention, not treatment. Once you have full blown cancer, your chances aren't that good, even with new synthetic drugs of the future.

I was actually kidding on this one. My point was, you can't be paranoid in supporting organisations that tries to help the weak/sick/poor. No matter how hard you try you will never, in this world, escape the comercial/money/human-greed aspect of things. But you cant let this stop you making a contribution towards the purpose.

Actually almost every organisation (not comercial company in the traditional sense) is setup because there is a financial basis for it to exist and even earn good money in many cases. But lets not take this any further, I was just joking about that way of thinking.

ikerekes · Post by **ikerekes** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:31 am

171.64.65.56 in reject status again!
I have totaly forgotten how does it feels to relegate a server consistently capable of doing 2900PPD, to crawling with 1300PPD on a P 5102 WU.

Post by **kasson** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:55 am

server restarted.

ikerekes · Post by **ikerekes** » Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:37 am

Thank You Dr. Kasson!

I didn't expected you to drop the turkey dinner just to restart the server, but that was a really nice Thanksgivings present

Thanks again.

Pick2 · Post by **Pick2** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:10 am

171.64.65.56 is in reject , not issuing WU for a while before that either.

Post by **kasson** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:38 am

Server restarted.

Pick2 · Post by **Pick2** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:25 am

Thank you ... Thank you very much

Pick2 · Post by **Pick2** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:36 pm

Pick2 wrote:171.64.65.56 is in reject , not issuing WU for a while before that either.

171.64.65.56 has been in reject since about midnight. It would appreciate a swift kick

Post by **kasson** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:03 pm

Given once again...

John Naylor · Post by **John Naylor** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:07 pm

What version of the server code does this server run?

Post by **kasson** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:13 pm

For various reasons, none of the SMP servers are currently running the "new" code at present.

Pick2 · Post by **Pick2** » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:46 pm

Server 171.64.65.56 once again needs a BFH Bump !

That's Big Folding Hammer

Post by **kasson** » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:04 pm

bumped.

Post by **toTOW** » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:17 pm

May I suggest the use of the Asus Repair Kit instead ?

Folding Forum

171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding

Re: 171.64.65.56 not responding