Pande Team PPD!!!
Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:51 am
- Hardware configuration: Intel Core i3 2100 3092.91 MHz (99.77 x 31.0)
- Location: indonesia
- Contact:
project 2681 = 25403 point
see psummary page http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html and found this list
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
Yes. It also takes 3 days to run on a dedicated 8-core box. If you have such hardware and are interested in helping with these work units, let me know.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 6359
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Bordeaux, France
- Contact:
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
This WU shouldn't be displayed on psummary ... also, the server doesn't appear on the server status page ...
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:20 am
- Hardware configuration: Q6600 | P35-DQ6 | Crucial 2 x 1 GB ram | VisionTek 3870
GPU2 Version 6.20| CPU three 6.20 Clients
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
This is real important work with the viral climate in the world today. I am happy to get the regular Influenza WUs on a recent foray into VMware an ubuntu running SMPThese projects study how influenza virus recognizes and infects cells.
Are the Linux machines the only ones getting these WUs?
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
For now, it's Linux and MacOS. It turns out that there are a fair number of high-powered Macs containing dual quads. I don't think there many machines of that class running Windows that could be dedicated to FAH, but if there are, I'm sure Kasson would be happy to hear about them. If the resource is out there, the Pande Group does a good job of figuring out how to use it.Leoslocks wrote:Are the Linux machines the only ones getting these WUs?
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:29 am
- Hardware configuration: iMac Pro Xeon W 16 core, i7 3.20 GHz, 64 GB RAM, OS V 10.14.5, ! TB SSD
iMac i5-7500 8 core 3.4 GHz, 8 GB RAM, OS V 10.14.5, 1 TB Fusion HD
Mac Pro X5675 12 core, i7 3.06 GHz, 52 GB RAM, OS 10.13.6, 1 TB HD, Cinema 30" + 23"
Mac Pro Intel Xeon Dual Quad 3.2 GHz, 16 GB RAM, OS 10.10.5, 512 GB HD
plus 44 more - Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
how long would this take on a mac mini?
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
You can't run it on a mac mini. It requires 8 or more cores. Sorry.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:09 pm
- Hardware configuration: Dual Processor 2Ghz G5 Rev. A (video production system)
AthlonXP 2800 Asus A7n8X-X (3D modeling system)
only a poor artist blames their tools. - Location: Michigan
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
Those units look insane. According to the math, 265 points an hour. I'm going to guess a half gig of RAM per thread, maybe more. If they're pushing the hardware as hard as I think, it's worth the points :>
The only thing I can think of that would run these is stuff in a film/animation studio or hooked up to a CT/MRI scanner. The highest end Mac systems would run them.
The only thing I can think of that would run these is stuff in a film/animation studio or hooked up to a CT/MRI scanner. The highest end Mac systems would run them.
I forgot what i had in here last time.
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
Maybe, but science keeps asking questions that are harder and harder to answer.Brian Redoutey wrote:Those units look insane.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:33 pm
- Location: Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
- Contact:
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
call me dumb.. but can't these sorta work units be 'cut down to size' ? Like i would think it'd be better to have work units that take less than a day to process continually being returned rather than large work units which only increase the chance of it not being returned (errors during processing... power outages etc.). I know with the PS3 client i'd rather receive 4 x 250 point WUs than one of the 32hr 1,250 point WUs simply if i have a power outage.. my PPD goes way down.. but also, the WU has to be re-dealt and keeps delaying it's return.
Cheers
Aussie Rules Footy | Team 52735
smASHer88 - AMD64 3500+ 2.2GHz 2GB WinXP Pro SP2 5.04
Lahm_Family - Apple MacBook Pro 13" 2.26GHz 2GB SMP
smASHer88_PS3 & Lahm_Family_PS3 - both 40GB PAL PS3s
Aussie Rules Footy | Team 52735
smASHer88 - AMD64 3500+ 2.2GHz 2GB WinXP Pro SP2 5.04
Lahm_Family - Apple MacBook Pro 13" 2.26GHz 2GB SMP
smASHer88_PS3 & Lahm_Family_PS3 - both 40GB PAL PS3s
-
- Posts: 10179
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Hardware configuration: Intel i7-4770K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR3-2133 Corsair Vengence (black/red), EVGA GTX 760 @ 1200 MHz, on an Asus Maximus VI Hero MB (black/red), in a blacked out Antec P280 Tower, with a Xigmatek Night Hawk (black) HSF, Seasonic 760w Platinum (black case, sleeves, wires), 4 SilenX 120mm Case fans with silicon fan gaskets and silicon mounts (all black), a 512GB Samsung SSD (black), and a 2TB Black Western Digital HD (silver/black).
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
Yes, but splitting up the WUs in to smaller chunks increases the work load at Stanford. First to split them, then the server load to send them out, and get them back, and then to reassemble. If you split that big WU in to 4 chunks, the load increases exponentially. And what happens if 1 of those 4 pieces (or all 4) goes to a slower computer? Or goes to a fast computer that is overclocked just a bit too much, and EUEs that same WU 3 times...? So it isn't always faster to send out more or smaller pieces.
Look at it this way... if the SMP client, which currently defaults to using 4 cores is better and faster at processing larger chunks of data than a single core CPU client, then a work unit which requires 8 cores probably improves the size and speed again.
Also consider that after folding this Really Big WU for 3 days, you get 25K+ points. What's your SMP client get in 3 days time?
Look at it this way... if the SMP client, which currently defaults to using 4 cores is better and faster at processing larger chunks of data than a single core CPU client, then a work unit which requires 8 cores probably improves the size and speed again.
Also consider that after folding this Really Big WU for 3 days, you get 25K+ points. What's your SMP client get in 3 days time?
How to provide enough information to get helpful support
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
I notice that this project does not show the number of atoms. I suspect that the number is very large, in comparison to the projects that we're used to running. There's no doubt that many interesting proteins are much larger than we've been processing and there's no way to fold half a protein. If I'm right about the number of atoms, the simple answer will be: No.smASHer88 wrote:call me dumb.. but can't these sorta work units be 'cut down to size' ?
Time to buy some new hardware.
Posting FAH's log:
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
How to provide enough info to get helpful support.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:25 pm
- Hardware configuration: http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=129842
quad opteron 8354 on s4985-si // qx 6850 // dual opteron 2352 .... - Location: Indian ocean
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:09 pm
- Hardware configuration: Dual Processor 2Ghz G5 Rev. A (video production system)
AthlonXP 2800 Asus A7n8X-X (3D modeling system)
only a poor artist blames their tools. - Location: Michigan
Re: project 2681 = 25403 point
Wow. That is a NICE mobo.....and I'm pretty sure it's not consumer level. Which makes me want to ask, is it a Tyan? What northbridge are you running? The RAM slot positions are somewhat a give away you don't play Solitaire on something like that
I forgot what i had in here last time.