best ppd i can expect ??

Moderators: Site Moderators, FAHC Science Team

Post Reply
onis_uk
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:57 pm

best ppd i can expect ??

Post by onis_uk »

is this about the max i will get out of my pc. current spec

core i7
3gb ddr3
2x 9800gt's
1 gpu client on each card
and 2x vmware clients running on my i7 :D

Image
Core i7 @ 3.7ghz
6Gb DDr3 1600mhz
2x Nvidia 9800GT's
kiore
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by kiore »

re The 9800GT's, no. I run 9800GT's at present and get 5765PPD on them on project 576X's . You could overclock the shaders on them via rivatuner or similar. Having said that they are the best projects at present for ppd on my system. Other projects will run as low as 3500ppd, I figure I average 4500ppd over all projects.
Your shaders will start at a default 1500, depending on your cooling you should be able to move them up closer to 1800.
Have got much higher than that but sometimes will get a string of immediate failures (EUE's) so best to be a bit conservative as EUE's not only annoying but bad for science.
You don't say what speed your cpu is running at, but at stock those numbers seem OK, you will see some discussion as to whether the i7 can run more than 2 x vmSMPs but I'm not buying into that. For comparison my Phenom II 940 @ 3.44 GHz does a little better than that with 2 x notfred's vm SMP's.
kiore.

Addit. look at what I am doing with a similar set of projects and the same config.
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 10#p101707
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
onis_uk
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:57 pm

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by onis_uk »

well i have oc'ed my cpu to 3.7ghz and my gfx cards to 650mhz core and 1750mhz shader. but my gfx cards are hitting about 95 degrees sometimes so didnt want to push them much more !!!
also i have read alot about more than 2 vmsmp's and it seems like if i have 4 running i'll get about the same total ppd as i would having just the 2. also i'd like my cpu not to be sitting at 100% usage all the time as i still have to use it lol
Core i7 @ 3.7ghz
6Gb DDr3 1600mhz
2x Nvidia 9800GT's
kiore
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by kiore »

OK then, just overclock the shaders though, 1750 sounds good. If you're using it for other things and the the 2x vmSMPs don't slow it down too much that looks good. Hey, nearly 16k ppd is good stuff! Other people do more, so what, keep that effort up this is a marathon not a sprint 8-)
kiore.
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by toTOW »

The i7 would do much better under native linux with HT on ... I guess you can expect 7 000 PPD at least. There's a long thread about i7 performances here : viewtopic.php?f=44&t=10033
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Grandpa_01
Posts: 1122
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:36 am
Hardware configuration: 3 - Supermicro H8QGi-F AMD MC 6174=144 cores 2.5Ghz, 96GB G.Skill DDR3 1333Mhz Ubuntu 10.10
2 - Asus P6X58D-E i7 980X 4.4Ghz 6GB DDR3 2000 A-Data 64GB SSD Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus Rampage Gene III 17 970 4.3Ghz DDR3 2000 2-500GB Segate 7200.11 0-Raid Ubuntu 10.10
1 - Asus G73JH Laptop i7 740QM 1.86Ghz ATI 5870M

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by Grandpa_01 »

kiore wrote: look at what I am doing with a similar set of projects and the same config.
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 10#p101707
You may want to take a look at the numbers FahMon is reporting the don't add up. According to FahMon it takes you aprox 7hrs to complete a 1920 point WU = 6582 PPD but it also says you are 80% complete and still have 3hrs to go, if you look at the total time for the unit 412 min. that means the WU is 57% complete. :?: Looks like FahMon has some serious calculation errors.
Image
2 - SM H8QGi-F AMD 6xxx=112 cores @ 3.2 & 3.9Ghz
5 - SM X9QRI-f+ Intel 4650 = 320 cores @ 3.15Ghz
2 - I7 980X 4.4Ghz 2-GTX680
1 - 2700k 4.4Ghz GTX680
Total = 464 cores folding
kiore
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by kiore »

Grandpa_01 wrote:
kiore wrote: look at what I am doing with a similar set of projects and the same config.
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f ... 10#p101707
You may want to take a look at the numbers FahMon is reporting the don't add up. According to FahMon it takes you aprox 7hrs to complete a 1920 point WU = 6582 PPD but it also says you are 80% complete and still have 3hrs to go, if you look at the total time for the unit 412 min. that means the WU is 57% complete. :?: Looks like FahMon has some serious calculation errors.
That the asynchronous clocks business, especially noticeable on vm ware they actually take about 15 hrs. Wish they were doing 6.5k each. :D
kiore.
Image
i7 7800x RTX 3070 OS= win10. AMD 3700x RTX 2080ti OS= win10 .

Team page: https://www.rationalskepticism.org/viewtopic.php?t=616
v00d00
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:53 am
Hardware configuration: FX8320e (6 cores enabled) @ stock,
- 16GB DDR3,
- Zotac GTX 1050Ti @ Stock.
- Gigabyte GTX 970 @ Stock
Debian 9.

Running GPU since it came out, CPU since client version 3.
Folding since Folding began (~2000) and ran Genome@Home for a while too.
Ran Seti@Home prior to that.
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by v00d00 »

toTOW wrote:The i7 would do much better under native linux with HT on ... I guess you can expect 7 000 PPD at least. There's a long thread about i7 performances here : viewtopic.php?f=44&t=10033
Have to agree with ToTow, but if you want to run GPU on Linux, its a bit more complicated. :D But not impossible.
Image
alpha754293
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:13 am

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by alpha754293 »

Has anyone ever tried to run the GPU client within a VM in a Linux host/Windows guest?
Hyperlife
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:38 am

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by Hyperlife »

alpha754293 wrote:Has anyone ever tried to run the GPU client within a VM in a Linux host/Windows guest?
You don't need a VM to run the GPU2 client on a Linux host for NVIDIA cards. Wine generally works.
Image
^w^ing
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:29 pm
Hardware configuration: C2D E6400 2.13 GHz @ 3.2 GHz
Asus EN8800GTS 640 (G80) @ 660/792/1700 running the 6.23 w/ core11 v1.19
forceware 260.89
Asus P5N-E SLi
2GB 800MHz DDRII (2xCorsair TwinX 512MB)
WinXP 32 SP3
Location: Prague

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by ^w^ing »

When i tried native linux SMP with GPU client through wine, i ran into a single but critical inconvenience. I wasnt able, with any tool i could find, to unlock the core and shader clocks while overclocking. Is there ANY tool for linux that can do that? And since my core clocks become unstable half the way than where the shaders can go, I'd lose MUCH more on GPU than what I'd gain with native linux SMP.
toTOW
Site Moderator
Posts: 6349
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:38 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by toTOW »

What do you use to overclock your NV GPU under Linux ? I know NV Clock, but I don't know if it can unlock shaders : http://www.linuxhardware.org/nvclock/
Image

Folding@Home beta tester since 2002. Folding Forum moderator since July 2008.
Hyperlife
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:38 am

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by Hyperlife »

^w^ing wrote:When i tried native linux SMP with GPU client through wine, i ran into a single but critical inconvenience. I wasnt able, with any tool i could find, to unlock the core and shader clocks while overclocking. Is there ANY tool for linux that can do that? And since my core clocks become unstable half the way than where the shaders can go, I'd lose MUCH more on GPU than what I'd gain with native linux SMP.
I think the only way you can do this with Linux is to edit the BIOS itself. I don't think Coolbits under Linux lets you adjust the shaders alone. There are some BIOS editing guides available on other sites.
Image
^w^ing
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:29 pm
Hardware configuration: C2D E6400 2.13 GHz @ 3.2 GHz
Asus EN8800GTS 640 (G80) @ 660/792/1700 running the 6.23 w/ core11 v1.19
forceware 260.89
Asus P5N-E SLi
2GB 800MHz DDRII (2xCorsair TwinX 512MB)
WinXP 32 SP3
Location: Prague

Re: best ppd i can expect ??

Post by ^w^ing »

Yes nvclock was the most useful (if not the only) tool i could find and it couldnt unlock the shaders.

Ah well editing the bios isnt something i would resort to.
Post Reply