Search found 10 matches

by Zac67
Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:13 pm
Forum: V8.3.xx Open Beta
Topic: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate
Replies: 7
Views: 543

Re: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate

Already tried looking at the db - there are four tables: config , cores , groups , units (empty). Neither holds any information about project performance or similar. Possibly related, the TPF column in https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/ displays ??? when folding. On the Work Units tab, only the current...
by Zac67
Thu Nov 14, 2024 3:35 pm
Forum: V8.3.xx Open Beta
Topic: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate
Replies: 7
Views: 543

Re: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate

> You can set columns from upper right account settings > appearance Excellent, well hidden column config! But there's no Estimated Credit or similar, just Base Credit. > Previous run time data, when it exists, is in client.db. Doesn't seem to exist - yet. I hope that's WIP. The client gets confused...
by Zac67
Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:24 am
Forum: V8.3.xx Open Beta
Topic: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate
Replies: 7
Views: 543

Re: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate

Sorry for being thick, but I can't see where to change displayed columns on https://v8-4.foldingathome.org/ after logging in. If you look at the table above, at 6.8% the estimate (10,979,237) is still nearly 20% lower than the 13,791,944 just before rebooting. The machine was largely idle and there ...
by Zac67
Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:37 am
Forum: V8.3.xx Open Beta
Topic: ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate
Replies: 7
Views: 543

ETA and PPD estimation are very inaccurate

(8.3.18 running here) The ETA and PPD estimations are miles off for fresh units. Not only does the client forget about previous WU speeds from the same project (like 7.x), but it also shows ludicrous figures after a reboot. Additionally, there seems to be something wrong in the algorithm in that it ...
by Zac67
Tue Oct 08, 2024 6:47 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
Replies: 15
Views: 13831

Re: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74

Thx, I can confirm the four missing WUs (oldest from 3 Oct) got credited last night.
by Zac67
Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:54 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74
Replies: 15
Views: 13831

Re: Work server: 128.104.69.82, Collection server: 128.174.73.74

I have begun tracking my WUs and have found numerous ones not being credited, not even after days. Involved Projects are 16770, 16771, 16722 - all from the Huang lab.

Is there a way to reject those WUs to start with? Otherwise I'm forced to accept them but will dump them right away afterwards.
by Zac67
Thu Aug 08, 2024 12:45 pm
Forum: V8.3.xx Open Beta
Topic: Command line control?
Replies: 3
Views: 5288

Command line control?

I used to schedule my 7.6 F@H client per command line options and to collect a work unit history, including

FAHClient.exe --send-command queue-info
FAHClient.exe --send-unpause
FAHClient.exe --send-finish
FAHClient.exe --send-pause

How do I do that with 8.x?
by Zac67
Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:01 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: missing points from all projects 19600 since yesterday
Replies: 33
Views: 138069

Re: missing points from all projects 19600 since yesterday

My first missing credit WU from that project that's still in the logs is from 4 Oct, so this issue isn't really new. I'm blackholing 160.45.68.201 until this is sorted out.
by Zac67
Mon Oct 16, 2023 11:21 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: missing points from all projects 19600 since yesterday
Replies: 33
Views: 138069

No credit from project 19600

Merged with existing topic - j Today I've had the second WU (at least) from that project without getting any credit: 06:54:05:WU00:FS01:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64) 06:54:05:WU00:FS01:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:NO_ERROR project:19600 run:880 clone:0 gen:565 core:0x...