Folding Forum

that's it, I'm out. You guys couldn't run a pissup in a brewery.

another one. I have to say this is poor behaviour.

Project: 16434 (Run 906, Clone 3, Gen 3)
09:39:12:WU01:FS00:Uploading 104.45MiB to 3.21.157.11
09:39:12:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 3.21.157.11:8080
09:42:17:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
09:42:17:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

I'm in the UK.

I had exactly the same error today:

Project: 16434 (Run 906, Clone 3, Gen 3)
09:42:17:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_QUIT (404)
09:42:17:WARNING:WU01:FS00:Server did not like results, dumping

HaloJones wrote:not a fan of passwordless access.

if someone has managed to get into my network then I have a little more to worry about than them changing my FAH settings.

I've not noticed any improvement here. Still mostly "WARNING:WU01:FS00:Failed to get assignment" unless I give it a good kicking.

Have you checked your host config? The advanced client neglects to enter one of the necessary entries in the config. Took me ages fiddling with firewalls (as per previous suggestions) until I googled what a config should look like and found this: <!-- HTTP Server --> <allow v='127.0.0.1,192.168.1.0/...

Check your host config has all the necessary settings. When I did mine via the client it missed one of them and I wasted loads of time looking for connectivity issues before I gave up and started googling and found a post that showed what config should look like: <!-- HTTP Server --> <allow v='127.0...

The advanced client neglects to enter one of the necessary entries in the config. Took me ages fiddling with firewalls (as per previous suggestions) until I googled what a config should look like and found this: <!-- HTTP Server --> <allow v='127.0.0.1,192.168.1.0/24'/> <!-- Network --> <proxy v=':8...

It's a real <... ehm ...> that the contributing ( and benefitting ) institutes don't feel any obligation to actively inform their donors by themselves! Let's face it, the management of this project is a complete farce. At a time when things are overloaded you'd at the very least expect some proacti...

scerbera wrote:try "client-type", "beta" or "advanced". I've had all my slots on each machine full 24/7 now for 3/4 days

that seems to have worked. Of course if everyone makes that switch then those WUs will run out as well.

ajm wrote:. That will reinitialize the attempt interval and better your chances.

yes, I can do that during the day but like most people I need to sleep so last night I had PCs sitting idle once again as they couldn't get any work.

https://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/aggregate_summary.php?s= then click "Daily total". Overall FAH's performance keeps improving at the same rate. Maybe there's something wrong with your PCs? yes, of course it's my PCs. :roll: 10:33:03:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Could not get an assig...

ajm wrote:Is it just me or are the servers becoming smoother, at last?

they were, now they've crapped out again. 2 PCs sitting idle for 12 hours. more waste

Uploaded here. Instead my machines have been waiting 12 hours for a new work unit to process. fantastic.