Search found 27 matches
- Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:01 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.26
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1346
Re: 171.67.108.26
Been watching that thread but got a WU that cannot go to that server for 24 hours now , getting a status 503 , and the server is indeed busy. maybe someone needs to sort the loading out as prof pande alluded to in the other thread.
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:26 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
- Replies: 414
- Views: 84677
Re: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
haha tobit from another Hardocp member and a long time BETA tester ' grow up and pleaseTobit wrote:How about fixing your attitude first?spike09 wrote:fix it please, its our frecking money and time you are wasting
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:52 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
- Replies: 414
- Views: 84677
Re: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
fix it please, its our frecking money and time you are wasting
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:02 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
- Replies: 414
- Views: 84677
Re: GPU server status 171.67.108.21, 171.64.65.71,171.67.108.26
Same here on both GPU2 clients
- Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:16 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 779, Gen 59)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 601
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 779, Gen 59)
Sorry was half asleep when i posted this forgot to drop in 6.23kasson wrote:The new 6.23 beta is labeled as the new 6.23 beta (just checked it); if you have a something saying it's 6.22b2 that's probably what it is.
Download from:
http://www.stanford.edu/~kasson/folding ... 32-x86.exe
Hope that helps.
- Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:52 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 779, Gen 59)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 601
Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 779, Gen 59)
5.92 deprecated client picked this wu up and had multiple eue's ctrl c ed it and saved work folder and queue file, downloaded what was labeled as new 6.23 beta but it says 6.22 whatever . set it up add work and queue.dat restarts and yes it eues at the same damn place . Q6600, 2 MB ddr 800 surfing t...
- Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:02 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2457
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
6.22 is now working but will do kassonkasson wrote:We would recommend upgrading to 6.23 as this is most likely to fix the problem.
- Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:38 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2457
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
I have updated to the latest client followed Xililxons guides and it is borked . I have been a beta tester here for a few years and never encountered a worse client release. the project folks post less here than on the old forums and the poor admins and mods are left to cope, step up to the plate St...
- Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:45 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2457
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
ran qfix got the same wu, deleted queue and work folder same wu
- Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:25 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2457
Project: 2665 (Run 3, Clone 446, Gen 42)
I have this wu all over me like a rash, on one machine. sys spec q6600, asrock dual4 core sata2 , 2 gig of ocz ram running win xp and the deprecated client. no cooling probs and no overclocking. [02:05:39] + Processing work unit [02:05:39] Core required: FahCore_a1.exe [02:05:39] Core found. [02:05:...
- Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:39 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 4596 (Run 9, Clone 3, Gen 31)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 635
Project: 4596 (Run 9, Clone 3, Gen 31)
this wu is a nightmare it's running on a X2 3800 on one core, 100 hours plus for 84.70 points wtf AMD are slow but that is really bad Vince Voelz check the PPD and code please :evil: 18:20:38] Project: 4596 (Run 9, Clone 3, Gen 31) [18:20:38] [18:20:38] Assembly optimizations on if available. [18:20...
- Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:17 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
- Replies: 3
- Views: 938
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
running install.bat didn't cure it downloaded ver 5.92 and all seems well
- Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:05 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
- Replies: 3
- Views: 938
Re: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
thanks I Will do as you suggest, as that is what i intended as a next step will lets the uniprocessors clients finish 1st though.
- Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:29 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
- Replies: 3
- Views: 938
Project: 2665 (Run 2, Clone 808, Gen 17) core status 63/99
The rig in question e6400 2 GB corsair pc6400 xp sp2, it has been folding SMP since the beginning pretty much non stop, this is the 1st time any rig has encountered a problem so bad that sleep was the only option. I have checked temps and voltages all seem fine and well within accepted tolerances. I...
- Wed May 21, 2008 6:40 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: minor glitch on stanfords site
- Replies: 2
- Views: 934
Re: minor glitch on stanfords site
DOH would think i was a noob at this