Folding Forum

It more looks like all servers with GPU WUs are down. Nvidia GTX / RTX and... 23:11:59:WU01:FS01:Connecting to assign1.foldingathome.org:80 23:11:59:WARNING:WU01:FS01:Failed to get assignment from 'assign1.foldingathome.org:80': No WUs available for this configuration 23:11:59:WU01:FS01:Connecting t...

But for what it's worth to anyone, I also (surprisingly) noticed quite a difference going from x8/x8 pcie 4.0 to x8/x8 pcie 5.0. At least 2-3m PPD on the combined total for both cards. These are trends I've noticed over multiple days. So take it with a grain of salt if you will, but from what I'm s...

For p12129, the short answer is : we don't know why some trajectories are slower than the original ones. I started approx 10 of them but completed only a couple. Picture was the same: all trajectories of p12129 produce significantly less points in terms of PPD then other projects. Also please take ...

nVidia stopped supporting and improving their CUDA libraries for older generation cards. New drivers new performance improvements to newer cards. This negatively impacts old cards. This is natural, especially with cards so old as 1000 series. This happened not so long ago. I don't believe in miracl...

I don't think so. 15402 and 15404 are still at the same level of points and these projects running on Core24, same as slowest 12129. Also we have people with RTX 5090 in this topic who reported the same issue at least for 12129.

I think that the problem is more about rewarding points. It's too low for this project. I wrote down some statistics for this and other projects that we have running now and ... surprise... many projects affected by the same issue. I have statistics from spring of this year for the same machine base...

For sure something wrong with reward points on 12129 project. I tried it on 1070Ti and 1080Ti and I got lowest PPD ever. ANY other project making at least 20% more.

Couple of days ago I noticed that 19600 disappeared from the list of active projects. Is it complete? No more 19600 WUs or it's just the issue with the server 160.45.68.201 ?

I saw somethere that this core gonna be a big improvement for AMD cards. Is this correct?
Whwn this core planned to become public?

I know.
Just want to know is there any limit on retries in 8.4.9.
I'm running remote workstation and not watching the client. 7.6 had no problems with dropping the downloading process and getting new assignment. Looks like 8.4.9 don't want to drop downloading.

03:26:26:I1:WU57:Requesting WU assignment for user ............... 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Received WU assignment r_HI8cGRTB4_DSPSqPO47SLWpVAWnP6qsDWu0pJCdTo 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Downloading WU 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Retry #1 in 2 secs 03:26:28:I1:WU57:Downloading WU 03:26:28:I1:WU57:Retry #2 in 4 secs 03:26:40:I1:...

160.45.68.201 is down

For sure we need more work units for RX 570/580/590. The only server that provides units for this cars is 140.163.4.210. Thats it!
It generates 1-2 units per minute, mostly core26. We need more! Better core 22 (no problems with this core)

I think bloking the work server is much better then dumping the unit cos actually you never getting the unit so no dumping required.

No its not. But you never get the the work unit from undesirable server and after couple of attempts assignment server just give you the work unit from another work server. It may be even next attempt so it works really good. We don't have any ways to influence the decision of the assignment server ...