Folding Forum

Couple of days ago I noticed that 19600 disappeared from the list of active projects. Is it complete? No more 19600 WUs or it's just the issue with the server 160.45.68.201 ?

I saw somethere that this core gonna be a big improvement for AMD cards. Is this correct?
Whwn this core planned to become public?

I know.
Just want to know is there any limit on retries in 8.4.9.
I'm running remote workstation and not watching the client. 7.6 had no problems with dropping the downloading process and getting new assignment. Looks like 8.4.9 don't want to drop downloading.

03:26:26:I1:WU57:Requesting WU assignment for user ............... 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Received WU assignment r_HI8cGRTB4_DSPSqPO47SLWpVAWnP6qsDWu0pJCdTo 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Downloading WU 03:26:26:I1:WU57:Retry #1 in 2 secs 03:26:28:I1:WU57:Downloading WU 03:26:28:I1:WU57:Retry #2 in 4 secs 03:26:40:I1:...

160.45.68.201 is down

For sure we need more work units for RX 570/580/590. The only server that provides units for this cars is 140.163.4.210. Thats it!
It generates 1-2 units per minute, mostly core26. We need more! Better core 22 (no problems with this core)

I think bloking the work server is much better then dumping the unit cos actually you never getting the unit so no dumping required.

No its not. But you never get the the work unit from undesirable server and after couple of attempts assignment server just give you the work unit from another work server. It may be even next attempt so it works really good. We don't have any ways to influence the decision of the assignment server ...

fpga_bloke wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 8:12 pm IS there a way to prevent 16525 from being downloaded by the client?

You can block outgoing connections to work server IP 128.104.69.82 in you firewall and you never receive 16525 again.

Did I request it? Where?
If I ever need it again I just install 7.6.21.

P.S. I would suggest you lose that tone, too, since I'm the one who... I would suggest you lose that arrogance. "I'm the one" :lol: Jeez! To be honest nobody cares who you are. Your nickname color is the same as mine (grasshopper) And nobody will cry if that feature never come back. It's ...

He is getting 6 in the row so maybe not so rare.
I've seen Core 23 and 26 units stuck at the end or at any percent sometimes. Core 22 never stuck on the same machine.
So something need to be fixed.

Estimated credit is the least useful thing there ever was in history of FAH. For performance testing TPF is the thing. Or even PPD. Maybe for you. For me it was useful. Don't need to tell me the way which is more comfortable and practical for me. PPD updates are broken at this moment and due to be ...

It would help us better guide for 8.4.9 client. Currently there is no explanation of Logged Credits on the Work Unit Details page. I think he is talking about this situation: https://i.ibb.co/yL802g0/Looged.png All completed units has 2 people failed on that WU. Why? Sometimes the unit he got fails ...

muziqaz wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 9:17 pm What other information is missing?

Estimated Credit is missing. It was really useful thing for performance testing.
Also current PPD estimation is really sux and updating really slow.