Search found 11 matches
- Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:10 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: New Assignment Server feedback/problem
- Replies: 143
- Views: 55025
Re: New Assignment Server feedback/problem
Hi, I'm having some issues getting work since last night. I have restarted the machine, as well as tried removing all flags and no change. I keep seeing "Empty work server assignment" I can ping the server but no work. Any help would be appreciated. 18:00:02:<config> 18:00:02: <!-- Folding...
- Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:07 pm
- Forum: CPU Projects - released FAHCores _a7 & _a8 (a4 retired)
- Topic: Virtual folding
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2908
Re: Virtual folding
I would use as many as possible, then reduce the priority for that vm
- Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:34 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 8049 (Run 593, Clone 2, Gen 21)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 871
Project: 8049 (Run 593, Clone 2, Gen 21)
This looks like a bad wu to me.? this hardware has been running without any errors. no overclock. running on 2x Xeon L5420's, 8GB ram 12:38:18:WU01:FS00:Starting 12:38:18:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: /usr/bin/FAHCoreWrapper /var/lib/fahclient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Linux/AMD64/Core_a4.fah/FahCo...
- Tue May 01, 2012 12:56 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6903 (Run 7, Clone 10, Gen 71)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 865
Re: Project: 6903 (Run 7, Clone 10, Gen 71)
I received this unit the other day, thought I would let you know [18:14:37] *------------------------------* [18:14:37] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [18:14:37] Version 2.27 (Thu Feb 10 09:46:40 PST 2011) [18:14:37] [18:14:37] Preparing to commence simulation [18:14:37] - Looking at optimizations......
- Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:32 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6097 (Run 0, Clone 36, Gen 192) EUE
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3919
Re: Project: 6097 (Run 0, Clone 36, Gen 192) EUE
I had this unit fail on me today several times. here are a few. [21:42:42] *------------------------------* [21:42:42] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core [21:42:42] Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) [21:42:42] [21:42:42] Preparing to commence simulation [21:42:42] - Looking at optimizations... [21:42:42] - Cr...
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:39 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1789
Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Blonde moment:
I found the problem, somewhere along the lines I had set the affinity to only two cores.
working fine now.
thanks for the help everyone!
I found the problem, somewhere along the lines I had set the affinity to only two cores.
working fine now.
thanks for the help everyone!
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:41 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1789
Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
didn't notice I had done that.7im wrote:And just for grins, please remove the double verbosity 9 flags. Thanks.
fixed
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:07 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1789
Re: Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
Yes, that's exactly what I meant.PantherX wrote:You mean to say that in the Task Manager, the CPU Usage is ~25% when folding this WU?
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:05 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: [SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1789
[SOLVED] Project: 7504 (Run 1, Clone 263, Gen 21)
I can't get this wu to scale past 2 cores. system specs: Dell Precision M6600 i7-2829QM (hyperthreading and turbo enabled) 16GB ram windows 7 It was started using Arguments: -verbosity 9 -smp 6 -oneunit -verbosity 9. Then it was restarted using Arguments: -verbosity 9 -smp -verbosity 9 with no chang...
- Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:11 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Two identical servers, different performance
- Replies: 28
- Views: 4009
Re: Two identical servers, different performance
do you have any frame times on the same Project for both machines?
- Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:13 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: F@H not utilizing cpu fully
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2756
Re: F@H not utilizing cpu fully
You are having the same problem as the OP, should just need to add the -smp argument\flag and wait for it to finish the current unit. At that time it should start on a SMP unit and utilize all cores