Search found 431 matches

by anko1
Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:01 am
Forum: New Donors start here
Topic: Send all flag not working?
Replies: 9
Views: 1423

Re: Send all flag not working?

Thanks for the suggestion, 7im. I bought an Ethernet cable, so I'm good for now, but if this situation arises again, I'll try the new shortcut.

Again, thanks for all the help.
by anko1
Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:18 am
Forum: New Donors start here
Topic: Send all flag not working?
Replies: 9
Views: 1423

Re: Send all flag not working?

Thanks, 7im and Bruce. I solved the problem by getting an Ethernet cable, but to answer 7im, this is what I tried: For the console, I used a config only shortcut. At "use advanced options," itypoed yes. Went down to the question about adding flags. There I typed, "-send all" and ...
by anko1
Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:14 pm
Forum: New Donors start here
Topic: Send all flag not working?
Replies: 9
Views: 1423

Re: Send all flag not working?

Thanks for the suggestions. You've nailed the problem, 7im. I have to take down the wireless network and use a direct Ethernet connection to send the units. Since I'm traveling on vacation, I don't have all the resources I might at home. I had a one unit flag on, but didn't get the ethernet connecti...
by anko1
Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:23 am
Forum: New Donors start here
Topic: Send all flag not working?
Replies: 9
Views: 1423

Send all flag not working?

We took our Lenovo laptop to Europe and the house we are in has a weak wireless connection (and five other people), so it's inconvenient to the others to take down the wireless so I can use a direct Ethernet connection to send the units I fold. I wanted to use the send all flag to send the finished ...
by anko1
Sat May 14, 2011 10:14 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 10121 (Run 2, Clone 69, Gen 0)
Replies: 3
Views: 894

Project: 10121 (Run 2, Clone 69, Gen 0)

Well, the good news is that it's been so long since I've had a problem, I don't totally remember what I need to post. Like the other 10121 project, this caused a Window's error report (XP). Did not restart same project, but so far so good on the next project (6068). [05:47:22] Working on queue slot ...
by anko1
Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:51 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Project: 6503 (Run 14, Clone 351, Gen 0) - EUE @ 45%
Replies: 4
Views: 1013

Re: Project: 6503 (Run 14, Clone 351, Gen 0) - EUE @ 45%

I've had the same problem with a couple of 6503s: Project: 6503 (Run 18, Clone 206, Gen 9) [22:06:12] Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps (94) [22:06:14] + Writing 'sec_per_frame = 186.666672' to config [22:06:14] + Working ...Gromacs cannot continue further. [22:07:51] Going to send back what have...
by anko1
Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:15 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: Can't connect 171.67.108.17 and 171.64.65.111
Replies: 47
Views: 13337

Re: Can't connect 171.67.108.17 and 171.64.65.111

Last night, local time, lot of work is successfully accepted. Only this combination of servers didn't the job. For information I put here lot of data from my log file. The PC is still in pause but I take the chance to go on work here and maybe lose: Slot 07 Done Project: 6314 (Run 392, Clone 19, Ge...
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:33 pm
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Good WU gone bad?
Replies: 10
Views: 1593

Re: Good WU gone bad?

I'm using Windows XP, and tried running both Windows/x86 qfix-native and qfix.exe from the link in toTOW's post. I keep getting an "Unknown version of <queue.dat> file" message. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? I noticed toTOW's message about an update for v.6, but don't see anything more re...
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:11 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
Replies: 74
Views: 15304

Re: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;

Oh, sorry. I misunderstood off-line. I thought it was permanently removed from service (who knows why I thought that), so I thought it strange that the program would keep sending units there.
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:47 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Good WU gone bad?
Replies: 10
Views: 1593

Re: Good WU gone bad?

Ahh, I'd forgotten about qfix. Thanks for the reminder.
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:41 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
Replies: 74
Views: 15304

Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?

Still trying to return units to 171.67.108.26 --- Opening Log file [April 3 17:33:13 UTC] # Windows GPU Console Edition ################################################# ############################################################################### Folding@Home Client Version 6.23 http://folding.st...
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:32 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
Replies: 74
Views: 15304

Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?

PS - I have been getting bad packet type messages on 171.67.108.21, if that's what you mean by an error message. [23:46:42] + Attempting to get work packet [23:46:42] - Will indicate memory of 2553 MB [23:46:42] - Connecting to assignment server [23:46:42] Connecting to http://assign-GPU.stanford.ed...
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:26 am
Forum: Issues with a specific WU
Topic: Good WU gone bad?
Replies: 10
Views: 1593

Re: Good WU gone bad?

@Wrish and P5-133XL - thanks for the information.
by anko1
Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:14 am
Forum: Issues with a specific server
Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
Replies: 74
Views: 15304

Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?

Those are the addresses showing up in my logs: 171.67.108.26: [20:12:39] Trying to send all finished work units [20:12:39] Project: 10504 (Run 79, Clone 68, Gen 0) [20:12:39] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976. [20:12:39] + Attempting to send results [April 3 20:12:39 UTC] [20:12:3...