Thanks for the suggestion, 7im. I bought an Ethernet cable, so I'm good for now, but if this situation arises again, I'll try the new shortcut.
Again, thanks for all the help.
Search found 431 matches
- Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:01 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Send all flag not working?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1423
- Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:18 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Send all flag not working?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1423
Re: Send all flag not working?
Thanks, 7im and Bruce. I solved the problem by getting an Ethernet cable, but to answer 7im, this is what I tried: For the console, I used a config only shortcut. At "use advanced options," itypoed yes. Went down to the question about adding flags. There I typed, "-send all" and ...
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:14 pm
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Send all flag not working?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1423
Re: Send all flag not working?
Thanks for the suggestions. You've nailed the problem, 7im. I have to take down the wireless network and use a direct Ethernet connection to send the units. Since I'm traveling on vacation, I don't have all the resources I might at home. I had a one unit flag on, but didn't get the ethernet connecti...
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:23 am
- Forum: New Donors start here
- Topic: Send all flag not working?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1423
Send all flag not working?
We took our Lenovo laptop to Europe and the house we are in has a weak wireless connection (and five other people), so it's inconvenient to the others to take down the wireless so I can use a direct Ethernet connection to send the units I fold. I wanted to use the send all flag to send the finished ...
- Sun May 15, 2011 1:39 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 10121 (Run 2, Clone 69, Gen 0)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 894
- Sat May 14, 2011 10:14 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 10121 (Run 2, Clone 69, Gen 0)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 894
Project: 10121 (Run 2, Clone 69, Gen 0)
Well, the good news is that it's been so long since I've had a problem, I don't totally remember what I need to post. Like the other 10121 project, this caused a Window's error report (XP). Did not restart same project, but so far so good on the next project (6068). [05:47:22] Working on queue slot ...
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:51 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Project: 6503 (Run 14, Clone 351, Gen 0) - EUE @ 45%
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1013
Re: Project: 6503 (Run 14, Clone 351, Gen 0) - EUE @ 45%
I've had the same problem with a couple of 6503s: Project: 6503 (Run 18, Clone 206, Gen 9) [22:06:12] Completed 235000 out of 250000 steps (94) [22:06:14] + Writing 'sec_per_frame = 186.666672' to config [22:06:14] + Working ...Gromacs cannot continue further. [22:07:51] Going to send back what have...
- Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:15 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Can't connect 171.67.108.17 and 171.64.65.111
- Replies: 47
- Views: 13337
Re: Can't connect 171.67.108.17 and 171.64.65.111
Last night, local time, lot of work is successfully accepted. Only this combination of servers didn't the job. For information I put here lot of data from my log file. The PC is still in pause but I take the chance to go on work here and maybe lose: Slot 07 Done Project: 6314 (Run 392, Clone 19, Ge...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:33 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Good WU gone bad?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1593
Re: Good WU gone bad?
I'm using Windows XP, and tried running both Windows/x86 qfix-native and qfix.exe from the link in toTOW's post. I keep getting an "Unknown version of <queue.dat> file" message. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? I noticed toTOW's message about an update for v.6, but don't see anything more re...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:11 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
- Replies: 74
- Views: 15304
Re: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
Oh, sorry. I misunderstood off-line. I thought it was permanently removed from service (who knows why I thought that), so I thought it strange that the program would keep sending units there.
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:47 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Good WU gone bad?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1593
Re: Good WU gone bad?
Ahh, I'd forgotten about qfix. Thanks for the reminder.
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:41 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
- Replies: 74
- Views: 15304
Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?
Still trying to return units to 171.67.108.26 --- Opening Log file [April 3 17:33:13 UTC] # Windows GPU Console Edition ################################################# ############################################################################### Folding@Home Client Version 6.23 http://folding.st...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:32 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
- Replies: 74
- Views: 15304
Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?
PS - I have been getting bad packet type messages on 171.67.108.21, if that's what you mean by an error message. [23:46:42] + Attempting to get work packet [23:46:42] - Will indicate memory of 2553 MB [23:46:42] - Connecting to assignment server [23:46:42] Connecting to http://assign-GPU.stanford.ed...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:26 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific WU
- Topic: Good WU gone bad?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1593
Re: Good WU gone bad?
@Wrish and P5-133XL - thanks for the information.
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:14 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: 171.67.108.21 is Reject;
- Replies: 74
- Views: 15304
Re: More unconfigured 80 ports?
Those are the addresses showing up in my logs: 171.67.108.26: [20:12:39] Trying to send all finished work units [20:12:39] Project: 10504 (Run 79, Clone 68, Gen 0) [20:12:39] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976. [20:12:39] + Attempting to send results [April 3 20:12:39 UTC] [20:12:3...