Search found 115 matches
- Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:14 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: Folding@home server not updating?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1221
Re: Folding@home server not updating?
I was checking my hourly results here but the server doesn't seem to have updated in the past few hours: http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/mai ... rjohnson11 The stats server says it is currently updating: update started at Mon Dec 24 13:00:04 UTC 2012 (Mon Dec 24 05:00:04 PST 2012) but the cache...
- Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:20 pm
- Forum: CPU Projects - released FAHCores _a7 & _a8 (a4 retired)
- Topic: Ineligible for bonus
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2075
Re: Ineligible for bonus
At this moment, I am not eligible for a bonus because I recently created a passkey. I want to get short WUs so I can quickly get to where I can get bonuses. Instead, I am getting long WUs, and it seems like I might even have to wait until 2013 to get bonuses. Can I do anything about it? Hi lakecoun...
- Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:00 pm
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv
- Replies: 110
- Views: 31916
Re: Projects 762x Testing Core v2.25 on Adv
... In short about the PRCG 7623 (67, 4, 0) Base and estimated credits still the same 14093.00 TPF approx. 38 mins. ETA still 1.81 days form the 2.53 at the start. ... OS Vista 64 | F@H version 7.9.2 17:28:24:WU00:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:0:"G94 [GeForce 9600 GT]&qu...
- Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:01 am
- Forum: GPU Projects and FahCores
- Topic: Some Fermi projects not yet re-benchmarked
- Replies: 44
- Views: 17876
Some Fermi projects not yet re-benchmarked
According to PG's bogpost unified-gpusmp-benchmarking-scheme-implemented : Most of the existing GPU projects have been re-benchmarked to reflect the changes in the benchmarking scheme. We are still in the process of re-benchmarking some old projects assigned to ATI and G80 GPUs. However, some Fermi ...
- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:27 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: GPU: Stream Processors - Bits, Number - what is important?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3937
Re: GPU: Stream Processors - Bits, Number - what is importan
... I understand that AMD and nVidia are using different approaches regarding their GPUs, so anything I say is only directed towards AMD. (And Folding@Home, of course.) From what I can see, the most declared features of a GPU are the number of Stream Processors, the Memory (Bus?) Width, the clock S...
- Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:14 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Programming background of community
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5923
Re: Programming background of community
30 years
Linux Shell scripts
Java
Some C
Oracle PL/SQL
Informix 4GL & SQL
PowerBuilder
and many others
Linux Shell scripts
Java
Some C
Oracle PL/SQL
Informix 4GL & SQL
PowerBuilder
and many others
- Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:22 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: DAB & transparency
- Replies: 64
- Views: 18017
Re: DAB & transparency
Not sure what points I'm proving by letting you know that I didn't have the reference on hand to show you where Dr. Pande said that QRB for GPUs was in the plan, but, now that I am home from work and have time to look it up, here it is ( viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19042&p=190618#p190618 ). And th...
- Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:19 am
- Forum: Issues with this forum
- Topic: Forum software upgrade
- Replies: 62
- Views: 26264
Re: Forum software upgrade
Is there any prospect of getting the View New Posts to work as it did prior to the upgrade? i.e. I do not have to mark forums as read, and I do not have to logout to get the new posts count reset. I have noticed that it is now only neccesary to logout to get the new posts count reset. i.e. I do not...
- Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:48 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
- Replies: 225
- Views: 49265
Re: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
I have no problem with a faster machine doing equal work getting more points. However i do have an issue with a WU with only 900 atoms being folded in the same amount of time and getting 3 x PPD as the 77,113 atom WU that i am currently folding on a dual L5640 machine. "Equal work means equal ...
- Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:21 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5214
Re: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
And it is still DOWNP5-133XL wrote:VSP12 is down again.
- Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:20 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5214
Re: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
P5-133XL wrote:It's down again
It's back up as of 09:10 PDT
- Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:34 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5214
Re: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
VSP12 is back up as of 10.00 PDT (17.00 GMT)derrickmcc wrote:VSP12 is DOWN again
- Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:49 am
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5214
Re: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
VSP12 is DOWN again
- Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:04 pm
- Forum: Discussions of General-FAH topics
- Topic: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
- Replies: 225
- Views: 49265
Re: Blog post: "Unified GPU/SMP benchmarking scheme ..."
I have no problem with a faster machine doing equal work getting more points. However i do have an issue with a WU with only 900 atoms being folded in the same amount of time and getting 3 x PPD as the 77,113 atom WU that i am currently folding on a dual L5640 machine. "Equal work means equal ...
- Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:08 pm
- Forum: Issues with a specific server
- Topic: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5214
Re: VSP12 DOWN 171.67.108.58-60, 171.67.108.141-4
VSP12 is now back up, as of about 20 minutes ago.derrickmcc wrote:VSP12 is DOWN.
This includes:
171.67.108.58 vsp12a SMP
171.67.108.59 VSP12 SMP
171.67.108.60 vsp12c SMP
171.67.108.141 VSP12 GPU
171.67.108.142 vsp12e GPU
171.67.108.143 VSP12 GPU
171.67.108.144 vsp12g GPU