Page 1 of 1
FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:08 pm
by HardToThrill
Hi,
I have FAH installed & running on three XPProSP3 computers on a workgroup network. FAHMon accesses (green icon) the CPU clients (v5.03) on two machines, but does not access (black icon) either the v6.3 CPU or ATI GPU clients on the other machine. I also installed FAHMon on directly the 3rd computer & get the same results. The FAH folder permission on all is set to share.
Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:44 pm
by toTOW
Are you sure that you shared the right folder for the v6 clients ?
Look in : "C:\Documents and Settings\<your_windows_username>\Application Data\Folding@home-gpu\"
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:06 am
by HardToThrill
Thanks - I mapped the application folder like the v5 clients - didn't know it was different for the v6 clients. I'll try it now ...
That worked - problem resolved!
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:03 am
by 7im
Maybe we could get UF to add something to his readme file about this...
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:16 am
by MtM
how about adding a scan to look for clients in common places during installation
Would be even better
It's really dissapointing I can not do much with c or I would try and help out with this.
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:26 am
by HardToThrill
There were directions somewhere to direct it to the folder containing the .exe file ...
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:20 am
by uncle_fungus
7im wrote:Maybe we could get UF to add something to his readme file about this...
What, you think people actually read the documentation?
Re: FAHMon can't access 2 of 4 clients
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:15 pm
by Shadowtester
uncle_fungus wrote:7im wrote:Maybe we could get UF to add something to his readme file about this...
What, you think people actually read the documentation?
What would be the fun in that