Page 1 of 1

Project: 4612 (Run 40, Clone 4, Gen 64)

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:44 pm
by anko1
Maybe something funky was going on while I was out of town?

Code: Select all

[11:02:29] + Closed connections
[11:02:34] 
[11:02:34] + Processing work unit
[11:02:34] Core required: FahCore_82.exe
[11:02:34] Core found.
[11:02:34] Working on Unit 04 [December 28 11:02:34]
[11:02:34] + Working ...
[11:02:34] - Calling 'FahCore_82.exe -dir work/ -suffix 04 -checkpoint 15 -verbose -lifeline 3864 -version 503'

[11:02:34] 
[11:02:34] *------------------------------*
[11:02:34] Folding@Home PMD Core
[11:02:34] Version 1.03 (September 7, 2005)
[11:02:34] 
[11:02:34] Preparing to commence simulation
[11:02:34] - Looking at optimizations...
[11:02:34] - Created dyn
[11:02:34] - Files status OK
[11:02:34] - Expanded 17211 -> 113624 (decompressed 660.1 percent)
[11:02:34] 
[11:02:34] Project: 4612 (Run 40, Clone 4, Gen 64)
[11:02:34] 
[11:02:34] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[11:02:34] Entering M.D.
[11:02:34] + New frame time estimate; Working...
[11:02:40] + New frame time estimate; Working...
[11:02:40] Going to send back what have done.
[11:02:40] logfile size: 5649
[11:02:40] - Writing 6169 bytes of core data to disk...
[11:02:40]   ... Done.
[11:02:40] 
[11:02:40] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[11:02:44] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[11:02:44] Sending work to server


[11:02:44] + Attempting to send results
[11:02:44] - Reading file work/wuresults_04.dat from core
[11:02:44]   (Read 6169 bytes from disk)
[11:02:44] Connecting to http://169.230.26.30:8080/
[11:02:45] Posted data.
[11:02:45] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~7 kB/s
[11:02:45] - Averaged speed for that direction ~34 kB/s
[11:02:45] + Results successfully sent
[11:02:45] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.

Re: Project: 4612 (Run 40, Clone 4, Gen 64)

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:10 pm
by toTOW
And the final bad WU of the series ? ;)

I wonder if those projects are getting close to theirs ends ...

Re: Project: 4612 (Run 40, Clone 4, Gen 64)

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:20 pm
by anko1
Yes, my machine went back to 3798s, so no more for the time being. ;-) Thanks for checking on all my units, toTOW.