Page 1 of 1
Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:04 pm
by Escher
I keep having a problem with this WU, seems this project has a lot of problems in general. I keep clearing out files in hopes to get a different WU, but continue to get the same one.
Code: Select all
[13:59:19]
[13:59:19] *------------------------------*
[13:59:19] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[13:59:19] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[13:59:19]
[13:59:19] Preparing to commence simulation
[13:59:19] - Looking at optimizations...
[13:59:19] - Created dyn
[13:59:19] - Files status OK
[13:59:20] - Expanded 413277 -> 10322281 (decompressed 2497.6 percent)
[13:59:20] - Starting from initial work packet
[13:59:20]
[13:59:20] Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
[13:59:20]
[13:59:20] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[13:59:20] Entering M.D.
[13:59:27] Protein: p2620_p1475_tet1_03_1 t= 20000.00000
[13:59:27]
[13:59:27] Writing local files
[13:59:27] Gromacs error.
[13:59:27]
[13:59:27] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNKNOWN_ERROR
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:39 pm
by Flathead74
Hang in there, Escher, normally after deleting bad WU files, on the fourth time you will receive a different WU.
ymmv
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:35 am
by anko1
Which client are you using?
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:19 pm
by Escher
I'm using the latest systray client
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:15 pm
by toTOW
I guess Peter will have to remove this one manually
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:59 pm
by anko1
I asked b/c I was too lazy to look up and see what type of WU it was. They've done a nice job of handling this type of problem in the beta SMP release. Hopefully this will carry over when it comes out of beta since the object is to have just one client.
Re: Project: 2620 (Run 2, Clone 11, Gen 32)
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:56 pm
by Escher
I really wish they'd hurry up and have an SMP systray client with a simple install package. Heck, make it support CPU and GPU too! Is this really too much to ask? If a user can set up 4 clients and a CPU client (like I have), surely they can figure out how to properly thread their app to do the same thing. It's not rocket science, but perhaps they need a good developer on staff to help.