Folding Forum

Is this a new project? Just downloaded it, but is not listed on Projects page. Just finished a 2485, so maybe it's similar?

still missing from projects page. Looks like I have five days left of processing at about 40% of my PPD for 2485.

Project : 2484
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 905

The whole range of projects 2482-2496 use the same FAHCore, and are all 905 points. PPD should be nearly identical.

I have encountered an EUE at 56% on Proj 2484 (Run 89 Clone 6 Gen 1). First EUE that I have ever had.

Details from FAHlog.txt are as follows: I am attempting to upload the EUE remains but 171.65.103.162 is not accepting, neither is the CS. Will keep trying as long as necessary.

I assume that this will get to Paula.

Thanks for your report. Sorry about the EUE. I have stopped all the Clones that seem to have trouble, including the one you reported. I am not sure yet that the entire run is in trouble. I will be keeping an eye open.
Thanks

Paula

@ppetrone,
Nothing to be sorry about, Paula. The System did give me ~500 points for the time spent up to the EUE event. These are "tough" WUs. Taking about twice as long per % as earlier typical WUs on my G4 Mac.

EDIT: Is there any know reason that I should be concerned about the Proj 2484 (R 236, C 8, G 1) WU that I am currently folding?

I cannot complete very many of the more recent WUs on my machine, the latest being 2484s. It has successfully completed two WUs in the past few weeks:

1. 2483 (R104, C27, G0): NaN (ener[13]) at 5%
2. 2483 (R199, C19, G0): Error 0x0 at 30%
3. 2483 (R199, C19, G0): Error 0x0 at 19%
4. 2483 (R199, C19, G0): Error 0x0 at 15%
[downloaded new Core_78]
5. 1487 (R0, C114, G39): Error 0x0 15 minutes into simulation (0%)
[downloaded Core_81]
6. 4100 (R62, C7, G17): NaN (ener[17]) at 4%
7. 4608 (R20, C40, G32): successful
8. 1487 (R0, C776, G33): Unknown error at 2% (client-core communication error 0x79)
9. 2483 (R199, C19, G0): NaN (ener[13]) at 5%
10. 1487 (R0, C776, G33): Error 0x0 at 1%
11. 4626 (R38, C5, G12): successful

And now the 2484s:
12. 2484 (R84, C17, G1): NaN (ener[13]) at 7%
13. 2484 (R148, C12, G1): Error 0x0 at 11%
14. 2484 (R111, C25, G0): Error 0x0 at 2%
15. 2484 (R111, C35, G0): Error 0x0 at 75 minutes (0%)
[downloaded new Core_78]
16. 2484 (R111, C35, G0): Error 0x0 at 13%
17. 2484 (R111, C35, G0): Error 0x0 at 5%
18. 2484 (R111, C35, G0): Error 0x0 at 17%
[downloaded new Core_78]
19. 2484 (R111, C35, G0): NaN (ener[13]) at 26%
20. 2484 (R41, C19, G2): Error 0x0 at 23%
21. 2484 (R41, C19, G2): NaN (ener[17]) at 1%
22. 1487 (R0 C369, G31): Error 0x0 at 190 minutes (0%).
23. 2484 (R168, C9, G2): NaN (ener[13]) at 12%
24. 1487 (R0, C369, G31): Unknown error(ERROR 0x79) at 3%
25. 2484 (R29, C5, G3): Error 0x0 at 12%
26. 2484 (R29, C5, G3): Error 0x0 at 4%
[downloaded new Core_78]
27. 2484 (R29, C5, G3): Error 0x0 at 4%
28. 1487 (R0, C223, G30): Error 0x0 at 240 minutes (0%)
29. 2484 (R29, C5, G3): currently processing

So here's what I see:

1. All of the project 2483s (which use Core_78) failed.
2. All of the project 1487s (which use Core_a0) failed.
3. All of the project 2484s (which use Core_78) failed.
4. The one project 4608 that I got (which used Core_82) was successful.
5. The one project 4100 that I got (which used Core_81) failed.
6. The one project 4626 I got (which used Core_82) was successful.

So as I can gather from this data, cores a0, 78, and 81 have not successfully returned a single WU while the two WUs that used Core_82 were both successfully completed.

Is your machine overclocked ?

I love these WUs. At 905 points and just about 3 days to complete, much better than the 110 ppd benchmark. Btw, I don't think I've had any EUEs on these units. I'm using Windows XP and the Windows graphical 5.03 client.

Edit: upon further examination, the 3 days applies to my newer computers. The older ones take 4 1/2 - 5 days.

WOW, three days? I thought I was doing good @ six.
I am running four low end celery's and each one has been chewing on these
for about two weeks now with no problems.

toTOW wrote:Is your machine overclocked ?

Nope. It is running completely stock. The CPU frequency and voltage are set at default and the RAM timings, voltages, and speed is set at SPD select. It's a 1.6 Duron Tbred-B on an ASUS A7N8X-E board with 2x 1 GB sticks of DDR-400, in case you were wondering.

It kicked a few more 2484s since that last post as well:

- The 2484 (R29, C5, G3) it was working on hit an NaN (ener[13]) at 8%.
- It got a 2484 (R121, C5, G4) that got an Error 0x0 at 7%.
- The next WU was another 2484 (R121, C5, G4) that died at 3% of an Error 0x0.
- It just got a 1487 (R0, C223, G30) that it has put away about 1% on and is still running.

I looked through the dmesg and I see a FahCore_78.exe or FahCore_a0.exe segfault whenever a WU gets an Error 0x0. For example, the 2484 (R121, C5, G4) failed with
shown in the dmesg.

So many issues looks like a hardware issue ... have you tested your machine with Memtest and StressCPU v2 ?

toTOW wrote:So many issues looks like a hardware issue ... have you tested your machine with Memtest and StressCPU v2 ?

It checks out with Memtest. I hadn't heard of StressCPU before, so I haven't run it. I'll run it and see what it says.

You can find it in this thread : viewtopic.php?f=14&t=430