Page 1 of 1
Project 1487 (Run 0, Clone 86, Gen 24)
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:25 am
by tmoble
Well, looks better than last time when it was eight hours for each percent, about 2.5 hours each this time. Take about 10 days on this AMD 3500. Anybody know what points will be awarded? Last time it tied up the machine for a month, gave 600 points. Not nice.
Is there some way to re-config the Linux client to exclude getting these WUs?
Re: Project 1487 (Run 0, Clone 86, Gen 24)
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:37 am
by toTOW
I think there are two kind of 1487 :
- some are very, very slow (huge clone number)
- some are faster and fold in a reasonable time (small clone number)
I don't know what makes the differences in folding times nor which exact Clone wil fold faster ...
Re: Project 1487 (Run 0, Clone 86, Gen 24)
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:53 pm
by bruce
tmoble wrote:Anybody know what points will be awarded? Last time it tied up the machine for a month, gave 600 points. Not nice.
1741 points, which should be a lot more reasonable.
In the future you can check the Project Summary page (see
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html or the link at the top of this page).
Is there some way to re-config the Linux client to exclude getting these WUs?
No, and Stanford still needs the science to be done.
Re: Project 1487 (Run 0, Clone 86, Gen 24)
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:07 am
by tmoble
Thanks for taking time to reply. 1700 for 10 days sounds better than 600 for 30 days.
Tom
Re: Project 1487 (Run 0, Clone 86, Gen 24)
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:46 am
by efishy
toTOW wrote:I think there are two kind of 1487 :
- some are very, very slow (huge clone number)
- some are faster and fold in a reasonable time (small clone number)
Sorry, I have to say I do not agree with this statement. See other thread with all of the facts I have provided that do not agree with your statement.